IN THE imbroglio of the Peter “no ifs, no buts†Hain affair questions are inevitably being asked about why Labour Party officials did not accept Harriet Harman’s suggestion that spending on the deputy leadership campaigns should be capped. The answer is apparently venal. Because the party imposed a 15 per cent levy on all funds raised the feeling was that they should be allowed to spend, spend, spend in order to maximise the take for party funds. Now there’s a bigger price to pay.
IN THE imbroglio of the Peter “no ifs, no buts†Hain affair questions are inevitably being asked about why Labour Party officials did not accept Harriet Harman’s suggestion that spending on the deputy leadership campaigns should be capped. The answer is apparently venal. Because the party imposed a 15 per cent levy on all funds [...]
by Tribune Web Editor
Saturday, January 19th, 2008
The only place you can read all of Tribune's articles as soon as they are published is in the magazine. To find out more about subscribing from as little as £19, click here.

