<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tribune Comment: Testing times for Gordon Brown</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tribunemagazine.co.uk/2008/02/28/tribune-comment-testing-times-for-gordon-brown/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tribunemagazine.co.uk/2008/02/28/tribune-comment-testing-times-for-gordon-brown/</link>
	<description>News, features and comment from Britain&#039;s left-wing magazine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:29:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter Kenyon</title>
		<link>http://www.tribunemagazine.co.uk/2008/02/28/tribune-comment-testing-times-for-gordon-brown/comment-page-1/#comment-1526</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kenyon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 14:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tribunemagazine.co.uk/2008/02/28/tribune-comment-testing-times-for-gordon-brown/#comment-1526</guid>
		<description>Dear Tribune

Why should a long-standing Labour Party member who happens to have consummate financial and administrative skills, be any less deserving of support for the post of General Secretary than a long-standing Labour Party member who happens to be a consummate political fixer?

In terms of performance we know that the Party&#039;s finances were robust on the City-whiz-kid&#039;s watch as Labour Party Director of Finance. While on the other hand we know that the pass was sold to the Leadership over Party Conference by a long-standing Labour Party member who happens to be a consummate political fixer.

I hope the NEC treats this as a genuine equal opportunity appointment, with a rather better informed view of the Party&#039;s current needs than is evident from your Editorial.

Yours with no hope of being salvaged from the applicants&#039; list in the event of unforeseen events.

Peter Kenyon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Tribune</p>
<p>Why should a long-standing Labour Party member who happens to have consummate financial and administrative skills, be any less deserving of support for the post of General Secretary than a long-standing Labour Party member who happens to be a consummate political fixer?</p>
<p>In terms of performance we know that the Party&#8217;s finances were robust on the City-whiz-kid&#8217;s watch as Labour Party Director of Finance. While on the other hand we know that the pass was sold to the Leadership over Party Conference by a long-standing Labour Party member who happens to be a consummate political fixer.</p>
<p>I hope the NEC treats this as a genuine equal opportunity appointment, with a rather better informed view of the Party&#8217;s current needs than is evident from your Editorial.</p>
<p>Yours with no hope of being salvaged from the applicants&#8217; list in the event of unforeseen events.</p>
<p>Peter Kenyon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
