Equality and union freedom: Warwick II details emerge

12:00 am frontpage, news

by René Lavanchy

LABOUR’S affiliated trade unions have this week drawn up their demands for the party’s policy commitments at the next general election.

The “Warwick Two” agenda, named after the 2004 Warwick Agreement, will be considered by Labour’s National Policy Forum next month. But a source close to discussions told Tribune that unions are also pressing for meetings with Number  10, one of which is expected next week.

Key areas of interest to the unions are:

  • New rules to protect the jobs of workers whose companies are bought out by private equity firms, on the lines of John Heppel’s unsuccessful private members’ bill earlier this year. The TUC and unions maintain that buyouts such as Saga’s takeover of the AA        last year lead inevitably to redundancies;
  • Mandatory company audits to ensure equal pay between men and women, a policy supported at last year’s Labour Party Conference and by Harriet Harman before she became Labour deputy leader;
  • Reform of laws governing industrial action, including a provision enabling unions to ballot their members by phone or e-mail, and provision for secondary industrial action by workers in the same company. A union official said that if a company closed one factory and other closures were mooted, workers in other factories should be able to strike;
  • An extension of the role of the Gangmasters Licensing Authority into the construction industry in order to prevent exploitation of workers on building sites, a move supported by construction union UCATT but resisted by the Government;
  • A greater commitment by the Government to procuring more goods and services from Britain without breaking European Union competition law. A union official said: “Somehow the French and the Germans can use procurement to the benefit of their own workforce but Britain doesn’t seem to be good at that”;
  • Reform of the minimum wage. In a rare instance of disagreement, some unions are keen to see an end to the current age-based banding and fixed annual increases, while others want the Low Pay Commission to continue advising on the wage.

Although unions want more freedom to carry out industrial action, they have decided not to go as far as Labour MP John McDonnell’s Trade Union Freedom Bill.

Mr McDonnell’s bill, which was killed off in Parliament last year, would have made it easier for unions to give formal notice of strike action to companies, and harder for employers to sack workers who had taken industrial action.

A union source said that Warwick II was “not the best forum” to raise all the same demands again. Details were being finalised as Tribune went to press, but an official said unions were “singing from the same hymn sheet”.

A committee of the Trade Union and Labour Party Liaison Organisation will submit draft proposals to the NPF and hand over discussions to the general secretaries of each of Labour’s 16 affiliated unions.

It is unclear how the Labour leadership, the unions and the NPF will work together to agree on policies. A union source described the process as “smoke and mirrors”, adding: “No one wants to have the discussion [only] on the floor of the National Policy Forum.”


3 Responses
  1. Andrew :

    Date: June 13, 2008 @ 8:59 am

    The Trade Union Freedom Bill is TUC and Labour Party Conference policy - not just “John McDonnell’s”. Backed by the unions, John moved it as a private members bill last year and the Government blocked it.

  2. Stan Embling :

    Date: June 13, 2008 @ 6:42 pm

    Hi Tribune! Unite say dispite harsh retoric of recent days they will never allow Unions to go bust! They refer to protect interst of workers who’s jobs go bust? All I can say over such matters is:- It’s a pitty another certain Large Union (a prominent member of the TUC,) is not made, in fact “forced” to re-emburse certain members VICTIMS FISCALLY, who got injured/disabled, then “forced” from their employment (within days,) by intimidation and coersion, in total ignorance they had been Excluded, Backballed, fiscally Disenfranchised, by that certain Large Union’s certain official/s (BEFORE us Victims even got injured/ disabled,) leaving our contracts, Union membership violated/voided, and us Duped
    /Deceived unwary uniformed member Victims, not able ever to refute or repudiate such illegal Dishonest actions! Why? Because the relevant evidence us Victims needed remained wilfully concealed and suppressed, purposely to sink our previously good injury cases SUNK run us injured Victims out of Time, to our fiscal detriments/prejudice! Only revealed many years after the events it became clear it was done so on false statements forged Official Documents….Therefore…In my opinion… when the TUC and other Decent Unions brings pressure on the certain large Union (Who as The TUC are fully aware of these serious allegations)and have the Fiscal disenfranchisment that certain Large Union placed on suffering struggling disabled impecunious VICTIMS put right!! Then surely the Unions/TUC have no right to make such promises to other union members or workers (for which Tax / VAT concessions are made,) surely ??? Also Note:- Which is of great concern to this day is the very fact; that this certain Large Union still helps fund the Labour Party also help sponsors two certain labour MP’s, (who are also fully aware of these serious allegations as they have over the many years allegedly allowed the alleged
    “dishonest” dealings to remain concealed / suppressed from the Public Domain,) allegedly on “expenses” which in my opinion is tainted money, allegely gained illegally off circa 2000 certain Excluded Blackballed Fiscally Disenfranchised Union membership from a certain specific area! In my opinion such funding and “expenses” allegedly Given to the Labour party certain MP’s is allegedly laundered! Make such “Expenses” funding appear clean!! Surely this is wrong ????? Stan The Man

    Posted by: Stanley Embling | 13 Jun 2008 19:10:01

  3. SOCIALIST UNITY » WARWICK II - what the unions are asking from Labour. :

    Date: June 16, 2008 @ 8:02 am

    […] Equality and union freedom: Warwick II details emerge From Tribune […]

Leave a Comment

Your comment

You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.