<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Equality and union freedom: Warwick II details emerge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tribunemagazine.co.uk/2008/06/13/equality-and-union-freedom-warwick-ii-details-emerge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tribunemagazine.co.uk/2008/06/13/equality-and-union-freedom-warwick-ii-details-emerge/</link>
	<description>News, features and comment from Britain&#039;s left-wing magazine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 09:17:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SOCIALIST UNITY &#187; WARWICK II - what the unions are asking from Labour.</title>
		<link>http://www.tribunemagazine.co.uk/2008/06/13/equality-and-union-freedom-warwick-ii-details-emerge/comment-page-1/#comment-3333</link>
		<dc:creator>SOCIALIST UNITY &#187; WARWICK II - what the unions are asking from Labour.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 08:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tribunemagazine.co.uk/2008/06/13/equality-and-union-freedom-warwick-ii-details-emerge/#comment-3333</guid>
		<description>[...] Equality and union freedom: Warwick II details emerge From Tribune [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Equality and union freedom: Warwick II details emerge From Tribune [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stan Embling</title>
		<link>http://www.tribunemagazine.co.uk/2008/06/13/equality-and-union-freedom-warwick-ii-details-emerge/comment-page-1/#comment-3289</link>
		<dc:creator>Stan Embling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 18:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tribunemagazine.co.uk/2008/06/13/equality-and-union-freedom-warwick-ii-details-emerge/#comment-3289</guid>
		<description>Hi Tribune! Unite say dispite harsh retoric of recent days they will never allow Unions to go bust! They refer to protect interst of workers who&#039;s jobs go bust? All I can say over such matters is:- It&#039;s a pitty another certain Large Union (a prominent member of the TUC,) is not made, in fact &quot;forced&quot; to re-emburse certain members VICTIMS FISCALLY, who got injured/disabled, then &quot;forced&quot; from their employment (within days,) by intimidation and coersion, in total ignorance they had been Excluded, Backballed, fiscally Disenfranchised, by that certain Large Union&#039;s certain official/s (BEFORE us Victims even got injured/ disabled,) leaving our contracts, Union membership violated/voided, and us Duped
/Deceived unwary uniformed member Victims, not able ever to refute or repudiate such illegal Dishonest actions! Why? Because the relevant evidence us Victims needed remained wilfully concealed and suppressed, purposely to sink our previously good injury cases SUNK run us injured Victims out of Time, to our fiscal detriments/prejudice! Only revealed many years after the events  it became clear it was done so on false statements forged Official Documents....Therefore...In my opinion... when the TUC and other Decent Unions brings pressure on the certain large Union (Who as The TUC are fully aware of these serious allegations)and have the Fiscal disenfranchisment that certain Large Union  placed on suffering struggling disabled impecunious VICTIMS put right!! Then surely the Unions/TUC have no right to make such promises to other union members or workers (for which Tax / VAT concessions are made,) surely ??? Also Note:- Which is of  great concern to this day is the very fact; that this certain Large Union still helps fund the Labour Party also help sponsors two certain labour MP&#039;s, (who are also fully aware of these serious allegations as they have over the many years allegedly allowed the alleged 
&quot;dishonest&quot; dealings to remain concealed / suppressed from the Public Domain,) allegedly on &quot;expenses&quot; which in my opinion is tainted money, allegely gained illegally off circa 2000 certain Excluded Blackballed Fiscally Disenfranchised Union membership from a certain specific area! In my opinion such funding and &quot;expenses&quot;  allegedly Given to the Labour party certain MP&#039;s is allegedly laundered! Make such &quot;Expenses&quot; funding appear clean!! Surely this is wrong ????? Stan The Man

Posted by: Stanley Embling &#124; 13 Jun 2008 19:10:01</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tribune! Unite say dispite harsh retoric of recent days they will never allow Unions to go bust! They refer to protect interst of workers who&#8217;s jobs go bust? All I can say over such matters is:- It&#8217;s a pitty another certain Large Union (a prominent member of the TUC,) is not made, in fact &#8220;forced&#8221; to re-emburse certain members VICTIMS FISCALLY, who got injured/disabled, then &#8220;forced&#8221; from their employment (within days,) by intimidation and coersion, in total ignorance they had been Excluded, Backballed, fiscally Disenfranchised, by that certain Large Union&#8217;s certain official/s (BEFORE us Victims even got injured/ disabled,) leaving our contracts, Union membership violated/voided, and us Duped<br />
/Deceived unwary uniformed member Victims, not able ever to refute or repudiate such illegal Dishonest actions! Why? Because the relevant evidence us Victims needed remained wilfully concealed and suppressed, purposely to sink our previously good injury cases SUNK run us injured Victims out of Time, to our fiscal detriments/prejudice! Only revealed many years after the events  it became clear it was done so on false statements forged Official Documents&#8230;.Therefore&#8230;In my opinion&#8230; when the TUC and other Decent Unions brings pressure on the certain large Union (Who as The TUC are fully aware of these serious allegations)and have the Fiscal disenfranchisment that certain Large Union  placed on suffering struggling disabled impecunious VICTIMS put right!! Then surely the Unions/TUC have no right to make such promises to other union members or workers (for which Tax / VAT concessions are made,) surely ??? Also Note:- Which is of  great concern to this day is the very fact; that this certain Large Union still helps fund the Labour Party also help sponsors two certain labour MP&#8217;s, (who are also fully aware of these serious allegations as they have over the many years allegedly allowed the alleged<br />
&#8220;dishonest&#8221; dealings to remain concealed / suppressed from the Public Domain,) allegedly on &#8220;expenses&#8221; which in my opinion is tainted money, allegely gained illegally off circa 2000 certain Excluded Blackballed Fiscally Disenfranchised Union membership from a certain specific area! In my opinion such funding and &#8220;expenses&#8221;  allegedly Given to the Labour party certain MP&#8217;s is allegedly laundered! Make such &#8220;Expenses&#8221; funding appear clean!! Surely this is wrong ????? Stan The Man</p>
<p>Posted by: Stanley Embling | 13 Jun 2008 19:10:01</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.tribunemagazine.co.uk/2008/06/13/equality-and-union-freedom-warwick-ii-details-emerge/comment-page-1/#comment-3280</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 08:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tribunemagazine.co.uk/2008/06/13/equality-and-union-freedom-warwick-ii-details-emerge/#comment-3280</guid>
		<description>The Trade Union Freedom Bill is TUC and Labour Party Conference policy - not just &quot;John McDonnell&#039;s&quot;. Backed by the unions, John moved it as a private members bill last year and the Government blocked it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Trade Union Freedom Bill is TUC and Labour Party Conference policy &#8211; not just &#8220;John McDonnell&#8217;s&#8221;. Backed by the unions, John moved it as a private members bill last year and the Government blocked it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
