Ed Balls: Britain isn’t broken – but the Tories would break it

IT HAS become a depressingly familiar sight. Whenever something awful happens in our country, up pops former Tory leader Iain Duncan Smith to proclaim it as just the latest example of our so-called “broken society” – and that, somewhat bizarrely, David Cameron is the man to fix it.

by Tribune Web Editor
Monday, February 23rd, 2009

IT HAS become a depressingly familiar sight. Whenever something awful happens in our country, up pops former Tory leader Iain Duncan Smith to proclaim it as just the latest example of our so-called “broken society” – and that, somewhat bizarrely, David Cameron is the man to fix it.

Don’t get me wrong – I had the same reaction as everyone else when I saw The Sun last Friday morning. Whatever the facts turn out to be about this tragic case, it was appalling to see pictures of a 13-year -old boy “Dad” cradling a tiny baby while playing with a PlayStation.

My first reaction was to check that everything was being done locally to make sure the young lad, the teenage mum and the baby are safe, properly protected and that they get all the support they need. These young people should be in school studying, not on the pages of the newspapers.

This case brings home to me how vital it is as a society that we do everything we can to keep teenage pregnancies coming down. We’ve got the lowest level of teenage pregnancies for 20 years – but this is still too high. Which is why the schools minister, Jim Knight, is now making sex and relationship education compulsory in every school for every child.

But the idea that this tragic case means “Britain is broken” is absurd. As was Cameron’s shocking claim in a Sunday newspaper that the appalling way in which Karen Matthews locked-up and abused her daughter, Shannon, could well be repeated by the five million mothers who currently receive income-related benefits.

So now is the time to expose and stand up against this Tory slur that “Britain is broken” and that the Tory leader is somehow a great social reformer.

First, the IDS strategy simply ignores the facts. Over the past decade, teenage pregnancy rates have fallen. So has child poverty. And thousands more young people are volunteering. Yes, there are some parents who don’t take their responsibilities seriously – and have to be made to do so. There are also a small minority of young people who persistently break the law. And it is right that the criminal justice system is tough when they do.

But these Tory “broken Britain” claims are not only highly offensive to the vast majority of parents who do a great job bringing up their kids; they are also totally unfair on the vast majority of law-abiding young people who work hard at school, play by the rules and, in my experience, deeply resent these attacks.

Second, the Conservative Party consistently refuses to support our Children’s Plan policies to tackle the causes of under-achievement, poverty or crime. The fact is that it’s this Government which is expanding one-to-one help to young and vulnerable parents through our family nurse partnerships, as well as family intervention projects which provide non-negotiable support for families at risk. It is our Government which is making sex and relationships education compulsory, and providing extra funding for organisations which provide relationship support and help for children whose parents do split up.

Third, Tory policies would make things worse – as we remember from the 1980s. In my department, they want to cut £200 million each year from Sure Start, when everybody knows that investing throughout the early years is critical to a child’s life chances.

They are also pledged to cut £300 million next year from children’s services – just at the time when we are working hard to get children’s services working together to tackle all the barriers to a child’s progress and well-being inside and outside of school. And Cameron’s inheritance tax plan would divert £1 billion to the richest 3,000 estates in the country without benefiting people on low or middle incomes at all – still a priority for the Tory leader, as he confirmed last weekend.

The Tories oppose education for all to 18, our new diplomas and our national challenge interventions where schools are under-performing – preferring a free market approach with new schools where parents can shout the loudest paid for by cuts to other schools. They also oppose CCTV even though in constituencies like mine in West Yorkshire, it’s essential to cutting crime and reducing the fear of crime. And their plan to give extra money to married couples – at the expense of the millions of children whose parents are separated, widowed or divorced – is about as unfair as it gets. It would effectively create two classes of children, hamper our efforts to tackle child poverty and do nothing to keep families together.

As Tory leader, cutting public spending and stigmatising single parents were Iain Duncan Smith’s twin obsessions. Scratch beneath the surface and not much has changed. David Cameron’s Conservatives are not progressive and they’re not social reformers. Britain is not broken – and let’s not let the Tories break it.

Ed Balls is Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families and Labour MP for Normanton

The only place you can read all of Tribune's articles as soon as they are published is in the magazine. To find out more about subscribing from as little as £19, click here.

About The Author

  • Peter Nicholls

    I agree with much of what Ed Balls writes in this article (23rd Feb). However, the failing acadamy schools programme somewhat undermines his implied claim of understanding how to improve the life chances of children. One educational system, comprehensive and state funded, is the best way to offer equality of opportunity. His current strategy has more in common with Conservative educatinal policy than he seems to believe. A basic understanding of historical programmes such as the CTC’s is necessary, and I would encourage him to consider this in the future.

  • Peter Nicholls

    I agree with much of what Ed Balls writes in this article (23rd Feb). However, the failing acadamy schools programme somewhat undermines his implied claim of understanding how to improve the life chances of children. One educational system, comprehensive and state funded, is the best way to offer equality of opportunity. His current strategy has more in common with Conservative educatinal policy than he seems to believe. A basic understanding of historical programmes such as the CTC’s is necessary, and I would encourage him to consider this in the future.

  • http://www.nscfc.com Mike Ellis

    The Conservative Party says Mr Balls consistently refuses to support our Children’s Plan policies to tackle the causes of under-achievement, and crime. It is our Government which is making sex and relationships education compulsory, and providing extra funding for organisations which provide relationship support and help for children whose parents do split up. That the Labour party has totally ignored a report by Civitas as far back as 2002 revealing that one of the major causes of under-achievement and ant-social behaviour has to do with the fact that after separation or divorce children loose contact not only with their fathers but invariably all on the paternal side http://www.civitas.org.uk/pubs/experimen ts.php . And we who work tirelessly in this field are left in no doubt that family law with its closed courts and lack of parity has destroyed many a bond between father and child and left over a million grandparents unable to share any time whatsoever with the grandchildren they love. As for the making of sex education compulsory, yet again we see just how determined Ed Balls government is on transforming society into a nanny state by wilfully usurping parental responsibility rights. Question arises therefore are our offspring our children or children of the State?

  • http://www.nscfc.com Mike Ellis

    The Conservative Party says Mr Balls consistently refuses to support our Children’s Plan policies to tackle the causes of under-achievement, and crime. It is our Government which is making sex and relationships education compulsory, and providing extra funding for organisations which provide relationship support and help for children whose parents do split up. That the Labour party has totally ignored a report by Civitas as far back as 2002 revealing that one of the major causes of under-achievement and ant-social behaviour has to do with the fact that after separation or divorce children loose contact not only with their fathers but invariably all on the paternal side http://www.civitas.org.uk/pubs/experimen ts.php . And we who work tirelessly in this field are left in no doubt that family law with its closed courts and lack of parity has destroyed many a bond between father and child and left over a million grandparents unable to share any time whatsoever with the grandchildren they love. As for the making of sex education compulsory, yet again we see just how determined Ed Balls government is on transforming society into a nanny state by wilfully usurping parental responsibility rights. Question arises therefore are our offspring our children or children of the State?

  • steve

    personally I think Britain is very broken indeed when Ed Balls can instruct all UK teachers to equate the Scout and Guiding movement to islamic terrorists.
    But there we are; Mr Balls – nice and cosy with his missus in his taxpayer funded ivory tower – thinks everything is fine and dandy.
    And he’s the one who went to private school , Oxford and Harvard so I suppose he must know all about the lives of Sun reading council tenants.
    BTW Ed I saw Yvette down at the bingo yesterday just come out of Netto she had with some right good offers for the Balls’ household.She was telling me how you had to economise – what with your hard earned expenses under the spolight. You’re in for a right old treat come teatime you are

  • steve

    personally I think Britain is very broken indeed when Ed Balls can instruct all UK teachers to equate the Scout and Guiding movement to islamic terrorists.
    But there we are; Mr Balls – nice and cosy with his missus in his taxpayer funded ivory tower – thinks everything is fine and dandy.
    And he’s the one who went to private school , Oxford and Harvard so I suppose he must know all about the lives of Sun reading council tenants.
    BTW Ed I saw Yvette down at the bingo yesterday just come out of Netto she had with some right good offers for the Balls’ household.She was telling me how you had to economise – what with your hard earned expenses under the spolight. You’re in for a right old treat come teatime you are

  • edmundb

    It shows how desperate Balls remains – after over a decade of failed New Labour policies, he still needs to relate back to “failed Tory policies”. He just doesn’t get it. The general mass of the population are just fed up with the failed policies of 25 years of machine politics – of whatever party. The scariest thing is that these sychophantic Brownites – Balls x 2, Milliband and Harmann (made a big mistake with her Gordo)now seriously consider themselves fit for the highest office. Thank goodness that with the coming electoral bloodbath for New Labour its unlikely that this group of middle class, privately educated Oxbridge clowns will ever see office again. Candyfloss Cameron unfortunately increasingly represents the least worst option for the British electorate

  • edmundb

    It shows how desperate Balls remains – after over a decade of failed New Labour policies, he still needs to relate back to “failed Tory policies”. He just doesn’t get it. The general mass of the population are just fed up with the failed policies of 25 years of machine politics – of whatever party. The scariest thing is that these sychophantic Brownites – Balls x 2, Milliband and Harmann (made a big mistake with her Gordo)now seriously consider themselves fit for the highest office. Thank goodness that with the coming electoral bloodbath for New Labour its unlikely that this group of middle class, privately educated Oxbridge clowns will ever see office again. Candyfloss Cameron unfortunately increasingly represents the least worst option for the British electorate

blog comments powered by Disqus