WAKING up to be told that someone wants you dead is never a pleasant way to begin your day. But that is exactly the news that greeted me when I woke to hear the headlines on Radio 4’s Today programme. Muslim cleric Anjem Choudary would like to see me stoned to death. It’s nothing personal, you understand, he just hates queers. I’m not too keen on religious maniacs who rave from the periphery, but that’s not quite the same as wanting to kill them. Does my magnanimity make me a better person than Choudary? No, but it makes me a better neighbour and isn’t that what religion is supposed to be about?
Asked at the press conference he convened to defend the ill-timed anti-war protest he had organised in Luton a week earlier whether stoning would apply to all homosexuals, even a Cabinet minister, Choudary replied: “If a man likes another man, it can happen… but if you go on to fulfil your desires, then there is a punishment to follow.”
Fortunately, there are safeguards. “You don’t stone to death unless there are four eyewitnesses. It’s a very stringent procedure.” Thank goodness for that. I was worried that this man of God was advocating something we just don’t do in a liberal democracy. After speaking to a Metropolitan police officer who happens to be gay, I was told that the police would look into this matter to investigate whether a hate crime had been committed only if they received an actual complaint. So I made one.
Hate crimes – of whatever nature – are notoriously difficult to prosecute. It is not always easy for the police and judiciary to decide whether a victim was chosen because they were black, Jewish, Islamic, disabled or gay. The only thing that perpetrators of hate crimes do not discriminate against is discrimination itself. They hate everyone.
Bizarrely, homophobic would-be assassins are afforded an extra layer of legal protection that is not available to their victims. While the Crime and Disorder Act 1999 made it an offence to discriminate against someone on the grounds of their race or religion, there no such deterrent to homophobic abuse. The Criminal Justice Act 2003 simply requires a victim’s sexual orientation to be “taken into account by the sentencing court as an aggravating factor in addition to race or religious hate motivation”. The Racial and Religious Hatred Act 2007 made it an offence to “use threatening words or behaviour with the intention of stirring up hatred against any group of people because of their religious beliefs or their lack of religious beliefs”. This is something I can agree with, if only because of the last bit. But what about stirring up hatred because of people’s sexual preferences? Or should I not feel threatened by the knowledge that someone I have never met thinks I should be stoned to death?
Instead, gays were offered protection against discrimination by the Sexual Orientation Regulations Bill 2007, which guarantees the fair provision of goods and services, including education and adoption, but stops short of criminalising hatred against gays.
Metropolitan gays might be tempted to dismiss Choudary’s rant as the musings of a mad Mullah, the stance adopted by the Daily Mail, a newspaper which once might have invited Choudary to write its leader if only public stonings weren’t so unBritish. But to dismiss him would do a great disservice to the family and friends of Michael Causer. Last July, in Liverpool, Causer was dragged from his bed and beaten. According to one witness, his piercings were dug out of his body with a knife. Causer died nine days later. He was killed because he was a gay man.
Research published this week by the Gay and Lesbian Policing Group and the Metropolitan Police reveals anecdotal evidence that beneath society’s tolerant surface, which often leads to abuse. Earlier this month, Gerald Edwards, 59, was stabbed to death and his partner, Chris Bevan, was severely injured in the home they shared in in what police believe was a homophobic attack.
Figures published by the Met show that while we have consigned public floggings and worse to history, homophobic crimes are actually on the increase. There has been a 5 per cent increase in reported incidents – from 1,008 in 2007 to 1,062 in 2008. A quarter of these involved physical violence. As the report estimates that anti-gay hate crimes are among the most under reported of all crimes the actual figure is likely to be much higher. In 2007 Johan Hari of The Independent questioned the need for gays to be afforded specific legal protection. Then I agreed with him when he wrote: “Hate-crime turns us into a special category. It says that stabbing me is worse than stabbing my heterosexual brother.” But then I never expected to hear Anjem Choudary call publicly for my execution. If I were to call for his, I would be rightly prosecuted – complaint or no complaint. This Tuesday MPs debated “Clause 58”, legislation that would criminalise hateful homophobic comments. Last time this issue was debated it was defeated by Tory opposition. Only five Tories have said they will back the bill this time around. It’s an interesting test of David Cameron’s committment to equality.

