Hodge accused over Barking selection battle
June 18, 2009 11:58 pm frontpage, newsby René Lavanchy
Barking MP Margaret Hodge was accused this week of involvement in alleged dirty tricks over selections to her local council. The row threatens to tear Labour apart locally and help the British National Party take over the council in next year’s elections.
Speaking to Tribune, Labour activists, councillors and community representatives have accused Ms Hodge of being a “control freak” who has engineered the deselection of Labour members of Barking and Dagenham Council in a bid to exercise personal control over her constituency Labour party. For personal family reasons, Ms Hodge was unable to respond before Tribune went to press.
Eight Labour councillors have been struck off the candidate list since March this year, including Val Rush, cabinet member for the environment, and planning chair John Denyer. A ninth, deputy mayor Fred Barns, was also deselected but reinstated on appeal. Barking and Dagenham has 12 BNP councillors, more than any other borough in Britain.
Asked what linked the councillors together, one activist said: “They’re all people who didn’t like Margaret”. Another declared: “She is a control freak and she wants total control… I can see the BNP controlling the council”.
Barking Labour Party has been riven with factionalism since 2006, when Ms Hodge was attacked over her remark that eight out of ten white households were tempted to vote BNP in the local elections.
One deselected councillor said of the events: “I felt it gave the BNP the oxygen it needed and I wasn’t alone in speaking out. I think that I’m now paying for that”. They had suffered “bullying and intimidation” including silent phone calls, they added.
Some deselected councillors were discriminated against for their disabilities, a well-placed source said: “John Denyer can’t walk the streets, but there was always something for him to do… Fred Barnes has a disability but he would drive everybody around, pick leaflets up, but he had a hip replacement. That was given as one of the reasons.”
Various sources complained that the selection panels had been fed misleading information about councillors. At least three councillors heard of their deselection before being officially told, and one said: “The BNP seems to know a lot more about what’s going on in Barking Labour Party… They told me before I even had my interview”.
Ms Hodge is said to have announced the deselection of two councillors in Barking’s Thames ward at a coffee morning on 13 March – the same day one of them, Cllr Barnes, received the letter informing him.
The MP is also blamed for alleged misconduct at Barking CLP’s annual general meeting of 2007, branded a “shambles” by two separate sources. They say that non-Labour Party members were allowed into the meeting but other Labour members were barred and that Ms Hodge’s staff instructed delegates how to vote. Delegates complained to London Labour Party.
A London Labour Party spokesperson said its selections had been “fair” and denied any impropriety, including any contact with the BNP over deselections. It was “totally spurious” that disability had been used against councillors, they added. Laila Butt, Ms Hodge’s CLP secretary, said Ms Hodge had no involvement in selections.



Terry Wade :
Date: June 19, 2009 @ 7:30 pm
Cllr Fred Barns of Thames Ward, London Borough of Barking & Dagenham was kicked off of the short-list for Thames Ward for the 2010 local elections, by the casting vote of the Chair of Thames Ward – George Shaw. Even though the rules say that a sitting councillor is automatically included in a short-list, and that a Chair does not have a casting vote!!!
Robert :
Date: June 20, 2009 @ 10:29 pm
Thats not going to stop Labour rules are for breaking according to them….
michael :
Date: June 20, 2009 @ 11:36 pm
why are mps so corrupt
michael :
Date: June 20, 2009 @ 11:42 pm
The MP is also blamed for alleged misconduct at Barking CLP’s annual general meeting of 2007, branded a “shambles” by two separate sources. They say that non-Labour Party members were allowed into the meeting but other Labour members were barred and that Ms Hodge’s staff instructed delegates how to vote. Delegates complained to London Labour Party.
VERY UNFAIR SACK THE LOT OF THEM
Ashley Singh :
Date: June 21, 2009 @ 1:03 pm
Its a shame that people fail to recongise that its the same councilors who failed in their duties to the local community which let the BNP in, in the first place. As a resident in Barking and Dagenham I would say that Margaret Hodge MP deserves a lot of credit for the work and support she gives the local labour party in their fight against the BNP without her and the countless volunteers from our community then we would be looking at a BNP Council come the next election and that would be a real shame on all of us. Maybe those who claim to be fighting the BNP should be putting their effort into doing work on the gound rather then bad mouthing the Labour Party.
Dissillusioned :
Date: June 21, 2009 @ 2:24 pm
Thursdays meeting for the selection of candidates for councillors was a disgrace. There was a fly in the camp, and we all know who. It is thought he deliberately fouled his voting paper so that the Chair had the casting vote.
This allowed for Fred Barnes, hated by the chair, but the most popular candidate for Thames View, to be eliminated. Personal vendettas were used at this meeting, and this should not be allowed. The welfare of the Ward should have been paramount, not the satisfaction of an old feud.
It smacks of corruption and dirty fighting by people who should know better.
Lizzy :
Date: June 22, 2009 @ 9:34 am
On reading the article and then the comments, it appears that Ms Hodge only has one supporter, and that begs the question why?
Mr Singh states that Ms Hodge should be congratualted for the support she gives the Barking party, well thats one way of looking at it, certainly not the view of national papers on looking at her expenses.
And perhaps Mr Singh needs to be reminded that the comments made by Ms Hodge just days before the 2006 elections were very very damaging to Labour councillors.
On looking through the local election votes in 2006 I note with interest the votes cast for the members named in your article, it looks to me as though their voters are very happy with them, and thats what counts Mr Ashley Singh the people who put their cross on the ballot paper, not what the MP wants or the corrupt bunch of people that now claim they are going to solve all the problems.
Give it a rest, if they get elected just wait for the trouble to start.
Alf Moore :
Date: June 22, 2009 @ 10:44 am
I have heard from a number of people from the London Labour Party regional board that conducted the panel, that most of the unsuccessful candidates were unable to answer even the most basic questions, such as what is the role of a councillor and what services does a council provide to local people etc…
I know that Margaret Hodge has actively tried to involve all sitting Labour councillors in the work she does. They are always invited to events that Margaret hold in the wards they represent. It is telling that the deselected Councillors are the ones who continually refused to attend and meet with local residents and in some cases actively campaign against the Labour MP.
You can not blame Margaret Hodge for the result in 2006, you can blame the lazy councillors who had done little in their local area over the previous 4 years. Some of these people have now done nothing since in the campaign against the BNP.
I understand that Barking Labour Party has been out every weekend campaigning for the past 2 years and Margaret Hodge has been to most of these canvasses even though her late husband was terminally ill for most of this time and whilst Margaret would always endeavour to attend, she has never been joined by Val Rush when she has been out in Gascoigne or by Fred Barns when she has been out in Thames.
Some people in Barking Labour Party need to grow up, accept the result and get behind the candidates that will be chosen over the next few months or put their money where they mouth is!
Jackie :
Date: June 22, 2009 @ 3:37 pm
I cannot comment on who or what Mr Alf Moore has learned from members of the London Regional Board but what he does say causes me and should cause everyone great concern. If as Mr Moore has indicated persons who did the interviews have been gossiping with all and sundry then this is a major breach in confidentiality and should be tackled at the highest level within the Labour Party and I certainly hope it is. Because I and many others who have read these comments believe them to be slander.
Mr Moore seems to think that just going out once a week knocking on doors is going to do the trick, when is he and others going to realise that people like the councillors he has named and others who have been deselected because they were on a hit list, work in their wards 7 days a week, not just one morning at the weekend.
And anyway Mr Moore its the residents who elect their Councillors not so called party officials and I think you will find that out as the time goes on.
Deborah :
Date: June 22, 2009 @ 7:02 pm
What a disappointing state of affairs. Fred Barns is a true Barking man who supports everyone on Thames Ward and thankfully has lots of local support. What a shame that one sad mans vendetta in this ward is stopping the residents getting the candidate they really want. I think George Shaw needs to think long and hard about his involvement and who the local councillor is there for ie not as his lap dog but for all residents. The local Labour Party in Barking needs to think to the future and not George look back to your day because thats gone. Let the residents have the candidates they want at the next election as it is going to be tough enough,times have changed people want Fred get used to it and let your vendetta go.
Phyllis Barns (wife of councillor Barns) :
Date: June 22, 2009 @ 9:06 pm
I would like to point out to Alf Moore who claimes to have been given confidential information from the London Labour Party Regional Board. that I am shocked that such information had been divulged, but hey ho what has subsequently gone on in Cllr Barn’s selection means that I am not too surprised. Cllr. Barns was not one of those who could not answer basic questions, he was in fact turned down for being unable to do campaigning. On appeal that decision was over turned. Cllr Barns has campaigned together with M.Hodge MP and myself. We have recently delivered 1600 leaflets in Thames Ward, campaigned with M.Hodge in both Thames Ward and Vallence Ward, so please refrain from saying he does not work. Please note that he was Mayor 2007/08 and Deputy Mayor in 2008/09 when time was of an essence. During those years he never missed a surgery. So I suggest that you get your facts right before opening your mouth and letting in the BNP. If every Labour Cllr had the support enjoyed by Cllr Barns (proof of which can be seen by petitions and letters to the press) there would be no need for concern about the BNP or any other party. As for the discraceful short listing meeting which was chaired by Mr.George Shaw, the saga goes on. Watch this space. At the end of the day the people in Thames Ward will show their anger at the ballot box in 2010. God help us.
del :
Date: June 22, 2009 @ 9:11 pm
Seems to me that Mr Moore is writing in a very agressive manner, and that could mean one of two things, either he is totally right in everything he has written or he is part of what appears to be a conspiaracy that looks to have been set up to get rid of what many have said to be hard working and trustworthy councillors.
In all my time in business I have always found that those who are in the right would put forward a calm and reasoned argument.
Those who are agressive and make comments such as the “need to grow up” and put their money where their mouth is” are usually the ones in my experience who are in the wrong, know they are in the wrong, but believe that if they shout loud and long enough people will believe them.
It is always better in my experience to behave in a calm and measured manner which appears to be the case of those who do not appear to agree with what has been done in Barking.
So if I had a vote in that borough I know who I would be voting for and it most certainly would not be M Hodge or any of the candidates she was backing.
Derek Stevenson :
Date: June 22, 2009 @ 9:36 pm
As a resident of Thames Ward where Cllr Fred Barnes Serves I am appalled by the shabby way he has been teated,although I am not surprised.Personal matters should not be the issue but what Fred has done for all the residents on Thames Ward.Can someone please tell me why Ms.Hodge came door Knocking on my estate telling us she had 2 wonderful coucillors?and that was before Fred Barnes and Joan Rawlinson new they had been deselected.What a sad state of affairs when 1 man can do so much damage to the party he says he loves.count the votes at the next election!
someone who cares :
Date: June 22, 2009 @ 11:33 pm
I am sick of people who slaking off good councilors. we have some great councilors who do alot of hard work in the borough Barking and Dagenham and we of Thames ward can not do this without our cllr Barnes he is very good and hard working man. hard working and trustworthy councilor. so let the people make the choice who we want in our ward. not some aggressive people who hold grudges. SO COME ON FRED YOU HAVE MY VOTE
close friend :
Date: June 23, 2009 @ 5:56 am
Just thought I would pass on our thanks to M Hodge and her cronies, they have exceeded our wildest hopes, and by taking out the most popular, and the most hardworking councillors in Barking, and by also ensuring those they could not get rid of are made to go into new wards that we hold, they have done our job for us.
We will walk through Barking in the local elections, and some of the people close to M Hodge know this.
The so called leaders of Barking labour party really should be more careful who you trust, how do you think we could make announcements in the council chamber about deselections months before they had happened.
There is a lot to be said for keeping your friends close but your enemies closer, and you probably had no idea just how close your enimies were.
Julie Munroe :
Date: June 23, 2009 @ 7:56 am
Cllr Fred Barns of Thames Ward, London Borough of Barking & Dagenham was hounded off of the short-list for Thames Ward for the 2010 local elections, by the casting vote of the Chair of Thames Ward Labour party – Mr George Shaw. ( whom in my opinon is a venomous old codger who is full of hatred and has some form personal vendetta against Cllr Barns which has been clear for all to see over the last 2 years . Mr George Shaw has tried to manipulate members of the labour party in which way they vote against Cllr Barns) ,We all know the rules say that a sitting councillor is automatically included in a short-list, and that a Chair does not have a casting vote!!!
WHY DOES MR GEORGE SHAW GET THE FLOUT THE RULES ??????
IT SHOULD BE USE THE COUNCIL TAX PAYER & WHOM LIVE ON THAMES WARD THAT GET TO PICK THE SELECTION OF CANDIDATES WE KNOW WHO DOES ALL THE WORK IN THAMES WARD !!!!! AND I CAN TELL YOU KNOW IT’S NOT CLLR BARRY POULTON ………. WE HAVE LOST 2 EXCELLENT CLLR BEING CLLR FRED BARNS & CLLR JOAN RAWLINSON ……….. IS MS HODGE GOING TO LET MR GEORGE SHAW RUN THE LABOUR PARTY TO IT’S DEATH !?!?!?
THE LABOUR PARTY SEEMS TOBE SOMEWHAT RUNNING WITHOUT A LEADER !!!!!!! BECAUSE I AM STILL WAITING FOR OUR MP TO CONTACT ME SINCE 26th MAY WHEN I RECEIVED A LETTER FROM DOWING STREET SAYING SHE WOULD BE IN CONTACT ???? !!!!
REMEMBER YOU HAVE NOT HEARD THE LAST OF THIS
WE WANT OUR FRED !!!!!!!!!!
THAMES SUPPORT CLLR FRED BARNS …………. SACK CLLR BARRY POULTON OR GIVE HIM A JOB ON THE BINS ( COS HE ONLY TAKES COMPLAINTS ABOUT RUBBISH OR FLY TIPS! FACT! )!!!!!!
Resident from Thames Ward :
Date: June 23, 2009 @ 8:24 am
Politics is a dirty business.
“Close Friend” (above) is obviously a BNP party member or supporter. Sad to say, he/she is right. Barking’s local Labour Party has played right into their hands, by paving the way for many residents to vote for them in the local elections next year. The dirty tricks campaign is alive and well and working from North Street. George Shaw should know better at his age. For a senior citizen, who was at one time a leading Council officer and a Mayor of this Borough to behave in such a nasty and spiteful manner is nothing short of disgusting and beggars belief. He ignored the rules, and used a personal hatred of Fred Barns to ruin the Thames Ward residents chances of keeping a concerned and caring Councillor to look after their interests.
Will these new candidates, who neither know the people or understand their problems, ever do any good for the ward? I don’t think so. I have been told that to see Barry Poulton, you must meet on his doorstep or at his garden gate, for the whole world to see, and possibly hear. Where is the privacy in that? Why doesn’t he hold a surgery like other Councillors? His main concern seems to be the state of the rubbish in the ward, and is indeed known locally as ‘the rubbish man’. How Apt.
Let’s not forget Joan Rawlinson, who has worked for years for Scrattons Farm Estate (an almost forgotten part of the ward). Will Barry Poulton, who is never seen on Scrattons Farm, work as hard for the estate as she did? I don’t think so. Joan is so disgusted with the way she has been treated that she has decided not to carry on as a Councillor for Thames Ward. This a great loss to Thames Ward as a whole.
The Labour Party has shot itself in the foot, especially in the light of the expenses scandal. For an old man who should know better, to be able to use the overall welfare of this Borough, to score points in a personal fight against a Councillor, is nothing short of disgusting. I was once asked to join the Labour Party, but I am not a political animal, and I refused. Thank God.
People who know what is going on are angry, and the local elections next year will reflect their anger.
George Shaw should be ashamed of himself, but I doubt he is.
Julie Munroe :
Date: June 23, 2009 @ 9:13 am
In reply to above comment
And for the record Cllr Barry Poulton is never seen on our Barking Riverside development either ! ………… Cllr Barns is the only councillor that works tireless on for both Thames View & Barking Riverside
I give Joan her due as i have said to her face she works very hard on Scrattons Farm and joined forces with me on many an issue over the past years !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
we need to get rid of dead wood and keep our councillor that work dame hard !!!!!!
support Cllr Fred Barns & Cllr Joan Rawlinson.
Our petition can be found in Sweet shop in Farr Ave and down at the creeks mouth public house ………… SUPPORT FRED SIGN THE PETITION !!!!
Julie Munroe :
Date: June 23, 2009 @ 11:07 am
I WOULD JUST LIKE TO ADD A WORD OF ADVICE FOR THE LABOUR PARTY , As clearly you miss-understand the concept of RULES
Rules are tobe kept and adhered too ………….. Somene needs to point out to Mr George Shaw – Chair of the Labour Party that only RECORDS are for BREAKING ! ! !
Angry Resident of Thames Ward :
Date: June 23, 2009 @ 12:26 pm
Join the online petition to sake the MP Labour is finished in this borough
del :
Date: June 23, 2009 @ 1:18 pm
Dare I ask what online petition please?
Concerned Labour Party Member :
Date: June 23, 2009 @ 4:25 pm
In nearly 40 years of Party Membership I have never ever seen anyhing like this. The London Region Labour Party and local officials should be ashamed of themselves, they are destroying the Barking Labour Party. Perfectly good Councillors have been deselected and the whole selection process stinks. The BNP cannot believe their luck.
A Very Angry Resident of Thames Ward :
Date: June 23, 2009 @ 4:42 pm
In my opinion in his time George Shaw has been a very dedicated public servant, in lots of his many roles.
However with his public feud with Cllr Barnes (which has been going on for several years) he has totally lost the respect of the many people like me that admired him. He is using the selection and de- selection for the 2010 local elections as part of this feud to the cost of all the residents of Thames Ward. The outcome of this will mean that Thames Ward will loose a very dedicated and hard working (Not to mention well liked and greatly respected Cllr).
This in no way will help the Labour Party gain a majority in the local elections. If half of the allegations stated above about the selection procedure are true and I have no reason to believe they are not, then I would urge the Labour Party to enquire further into the way these procedures were carried out.
A Very Angry Resident of Thames Ward :
Date: June 23, 2009 @ 4:46 pm
I forgot to mention that me and all my family will definitely be signing the petition to support Fred Barnes
Derek Stevenson :
Date: June 24, 2009 @ 4:15 am
Margeret Hodge has only recently been seen on a regular basis on Thames View Estate.This is not because she wants to help local residents ( as she says ) but because she knows that Labour has well and truly lost the support it once had.WAKE UP AND SMELL THE COFFEE!You have allowed one man to dictate the outcome of an important decision YOU ARE AS MUCH TO BLAME IF NOT MORE!! As for our friendly neighbourhood bufoon who ruined his ballot paper well what can I say.Where the Hell Were You When The Council Wanted To Move All The Residents From Maud Gardens!!You Live There You Idiot!!I have voted labour all my life this little circus has left a nasty taste in my mouth so I will not be supporting labour in 2010 unless Fred Barnes and Joan Rawlinson Stand……..No..Well Theres a Surprise!!!!
close friend :
Date: June 24, 2009 @ 8:25 am
We have continued to read the posts with great interest, but, would like to remind the posters not to get stuck on hammering one person, you need to look at the bigger picture.
We needed to take out the big hitters, this has been a long time in the planning, and relatively easy to do, just a matter of stroking the egos of certain individuals, going from the top with the MP to the bottom with certain peoples who have their own racist views, yes, racisim really does work both ways in Barking.
But you need to realise that we may have done the stroking, and put ideas in now and then, but, this little lot were hungry for it, they honestly do believe its theirs by right, G Shaw just wanted to deal the death blow to Fred and he has done that.
But when all is said and done, when this little lot wake up on the morning after the elections and realise they have lost we will have the last laugh.
Carry on keeping your enimies closer your doing fine by us.
Resident of Thames Ward :
Date: June 24, 2009 @ 12:05 pm
A message to Mr George Shaw (that is if has knows how to use internet!? as he is as out of date as all the rubbish he spouts!!)
You have well & truly lost this one for Labour & Margaret Hodge MP, who needs enimies with friends like you Mr Shaw !!!!
watch you lose every labour seat in Thames ward in 2010 hope your happy with yourself now.
carley :
Date: June 24, 2009 @ 12:46 pm
George Shaw should know better at his age. For a senior citizen, who was at once a leading Council officer in Barking & Dagenham to behave in such a manner makes me nothing short of disgusted what nasty evil little man Mr Shaw is. He ignored the rules, and made personal attacks against Cllr Barns during local neighbourhood management meeting to which the meeting chair person Cllr Barry Poulton reckons never heard the comment made by Mr shaw when council officers also presant sat further away than he heard it loud & clear.
Just show how corrupt Mr George Shaw & Cllr Barry Poulton really are, and can be seen daily meeting on the view to go over to the labour party office in north street to cook up the next batch of of back-stabbing deals against our excellent hard working ward councillors.
i urge everyone to sign the petition
Puneet Gupta :
Date: June 24, 2009 @ 1:08 pm
I am appalled at how this has panned out. Alok Agrawal has served the Becontree ward with dedication and distinction and I have personally seen improvements in the state of road repairs on my road as a result. He is a beacon of strength against the very real threat of more BNP councillors in the area. He works tirelessly for the local labour party and he is always ready to serve and be the host, using his accommodation at Becontree Avenue as a venue for meetings. What a travesty
Roger Green :
Date: June 24, 2009 @ 1:10 pm
Margarat Hodge should be ashamed at herself the way she is behaving. She is acting like a dictator with a huge ego, without recognising the realities on the ground. The people she is usurping are all very loyal local public servants. shame on her
'Old Labour' :
Date: June 24, 2009 @ 1:26 pm
Neil Kinnock did a grand job in the past of getting rid of the Militant Tendency from Labour’s ranks.
Sadly it seems that some of them just became sleepers. Waiting for the moment to strike back.
Well, looking at what is happening in Barking makes you realise that the Militant Tendency is back in town (Barking that is).
It seems that a select few are intent on achieving their own ends, never mind about socialist ideals.
WAKE UP GORDON BROWN!!
Helen Blake :
Date: June 24, 2009 @ 3:56 pm
What absolute rubbish Alf Moore, Val Rush has turned up to meetings/events held by Hodge on the gascoigne even when she has been phoned by Hodge’s camp and told it has been cancelled, or given the wrong time and/or date. I have been sitting next to her when she has had the calls cancelling this and that and she has still gone ‘just in case’. Is this how our councillors should be treated?
And personally knowing the amount of work Val Rush does for the Gascoigne residents, and how much she has given to the labour party it is an absolute disgrace how she has been treated.
Yes I may be biased as I am her daughter, but I am also the one person who has seen how tirelessly she works, how she went to meetings even when she was ill, how she doesn’t work set hours but all hours, she takes calls during dinner, up to 10pm if not later at night, during her supposed ‘holidays’. She treats everyone equally and has supported her community so tirelessly that to be disposed of like a used chew toy makes the bile rise in my throat.
The other councillors deselected have also worked hard for their community and this is a power trip… nothing else. They loathe the BNP and rally against it and this is their reward
for shame
Disillusioned Thames Ward Labour member :
Date: June 24, 2009 @ 4:06 pm
I have just read in the Dagenham Post that our councillor Fred Barns will not be able stand as a candidate in Thames Ward at the next election. This is because George Shaw, chairman of the Thames Labour Ward has a personal vendetta against him and also works for our MP. M.Hodge in her constituency Labour office. What on earth is this all about? We are aware that Mr. Shaw has issues with concillor Barns, we have witnessed his viscious attacks in meetings such as Tenants and residents meetings, Neighbourhood Partnership meetings etc. These were reported to both the Leader of the Council and the Chief executive. I must point out the Councillor Barns took these attacks with dignaty and I never on any occasion heard him retalliate. I also read in the same paper under the heading “Dirty tricks story” that Dominic Twomey secretary to the Barking and Dagenham Labour Party said”that M.Hodge. MP.was completely independent from the selectiom process” he also stated “that what is important is ensuring the best people for the job and concerns of resdents are taken up” Strange! I now discover that D.Twomey has been short listed for Thames Ward together with others who work for Matgaret Hodge. Please don’t insult our intelegence D.Twomey in saying that the short list was completely independent.
You may fool some of the people some of the time but you can’t fool all the people all of the time. Is the Leader of the Council able to put right the injustices in the selection process which have been rife throughout the borough?
Labour Party Member :
Date: June 24, 2009 @ 4:19 pm
What a tragedy Cllr Alok Agrawal has been deselected, how on earth could London Region Labour party deselect such a dedicated Councillor, well respected and liked in the local community. This is a complete travesty, there will be a day of reckoning, what goes round comes round, remember that!
Resident from Thames Ward :
Date: June 24, 2009 @ 5:37 pm
A disturbing fact seems to have been overlooked.
When selections are arranged a report has to be made on all the presently standing Councillors.
Months ago the reports for the three Councillors representing Thames Ward were written by Councillor Barry Poulton. How can a Councillor write a report on himself?
Predictably the two Councillors for Thames Ward, Fred Barnes and Joan Rawlinson have been deselected, whilst Barry Poulton is now assured that he has been re-selected.
This strikes of nepotism, and I find the whole matter an even dirtier state of affairs than the rest of it.
A VERY STRANGE STATE OF AFFAIRS.
Ted from Thames Ward :
Date: June 24, 2009 @ 5:44 pm
I am appalled at what I have just read in my local newspaper the Dagenham Post.It appears that cllr.Barnswill not be able to stand inThames.Cllr.Barns has always worked tirelessly for all the people in Thames ward, he is well liked and trusted as a friend. We know that when you go to him with a problem or complaint you will get 100% commitment. He holds no punches and tells you howit is. He keeps you informed every step of the way and at the end of the day if he he cannot resolve the problem he will know someone who can,(not like George Shaw when he was cllr. on the ward when he was known as the leave it to me man and very little ever got done) I read that the reason cllr,Barns was not resellected was because of a vendetta George Shaw has against him, could this be because Fred has knocked him off his perch in Thames?
We as residents will not support anyone else being put forward as Labour candidates unless our Fred is amongst them. What with the MP’s expenses debacle and in the local Labour Party Labour is sinking in a hole of its own making.Fred you know that you have our support in whatever you decide to do.
IT’s NO FRED NO LABOUR VOTE
Daphne Purvis Great Fleet/Thames Ward :
Date: June 24, 2009 @ 6:15 pm
I certainly will not be voting Labour. With all that is going on within the Labour Party I think the lot of them should be sacked (shame it is not upto us to do it) Fred Barnes is one of the best councillor’s you could wish to have, he will help you no end, if you have a complaint he is on call 24/7 will sort it out and get back to you with an answer, not like your Barry Poulton’s and George Shaw. Every meeting that I have been to on Thames View always ends up with George Shaw having a go at Fred, and Fred never comes back at him. And may I add Councillor Poulton always lets him go on and on so that other people never have a chance to get their say. It will be a sad day if Fred is not reselected, and the BNP get in God Help us all.
Resident of Thames Ward: :
Date: June 24, 2009 @ 10:30 pm
OH Look Ms Hodge , Just shows how many people DO read the POST NEWSPAPER !!!
RE: Your comment recently “no one reads the post” !!
Sick to the back teeth of Labour! :
Date: June 25, 2009 @ 9:18 am
I think it’s a good thing that Cllr. Joan Rawlinson and Cllr. Fred Barnes were deselected. Next year they should take a stand, and go independent for Thames Ward. Lets face it, you have more chance of hell freezing over than Labour getting in again. Joan Rawlinson had dedicated 15 years of her life helping people with their problems, she bends over backwards in all cases.
Go Joan & Fred, lets wipe the smirks off their faces next May (especially past it George Shaw) You have so much support!
P.S Barry Poultent, Go crawl under the rock you came from, you never know, you may find some rubbish under there!!
molly :
Date: June 25, 2009 @ 9:35 am
The developing conversation on this site is quite amazing. Now the question must be asked are Labour Listening?
If you just set aside the personalities involved and read and research the processes that appear to have been used, they are I would suggest questionable.
Never before in Barking & Dagenham has the level of corruption been so blatent and splashed over the media.
Even in the local press sides appear to have been taken and the local press appear to be totally on the side of those councillors who have been fraudently deselected.
And even more strange is the fact that the Labour Party itself is not putting up a robust defence on its actions, it is more a case of 2 fingers up to you all we have done it and there is nothing you can do about it.
Well I believe they have made the biggest and most catastrophic mistake in the history of Labour in Barking, they have guaranteed that the BNP now have an open door, reading back over the posts one could almost imagine that was the plan from the start.
But rational thought processes was never the strongest point with these so called leaders in the Barking Labour Party, their strongest starting point is usually “what am I going to get out of this”. These people are well known in the borough and when the election campaign starts proper in 2010 one would hope that they are ready for all of their skeletons to walk out of the cupboard.
Resident of Becontree Ward :
Date: June 25, 2009 @ 10:01 am
Cllr Alok Agrawal was the first to face the BNP in Barking and Dagenham in the 2005 by-election. He was also one of only 3, yes thats correct 3 labour councillors that actually beat the BNP.
All the other labout councillors in contested seats came in third…(this is quite easy to check.)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barking_and_Dagenham_Council_election_2006
So why is the local Labour party so intent to remove a councillor with a proven track record against the BNP
http://www.barking-dagenham.gov.uk/9-democracy/elections/results/elect-by-becontree-05.html
Cllr Agrawal is well known in the area and well liked. He is a local businessman and has run his business for over 20 years. He has worked very hard in the area since becoming councillor n 2005.
He has been deselected on a technicality, that interestingly, was not an issue the last 3 times he was selected to stand and has suddenly become an issue.
I am sure all of you can read between the lines. I just hope the Barking CLP will be happy being the third party in the next elections.
We will vote for Cllr Agrawal but not for the Labour party. Until all the cronies leave the party we dont want to have anything to do with it.
disillussioned resident :
Date: June 25, 2009 @ 10:55 am
do the residents of thames ward realise how much damage they are doing
not to just themselves but to cllr
barnes,the community and the labour
party,is it right that such personal
attacks on people should be smeared
all over the press,are you cutting
your nose off to spite your face
if fred barnes is such a decent chap
he probaly would not like to see this
sort of vendetta happening in the press either, maybe it is time for residents to calm down a bit as they have made their point loud and clear
and by the way, enimies is spelt enemies .if the bnp are to be beaten
then everyone must work together,
nd sort out problems through the correct channels and not through nasty personal attacks in the press
Ex LBBD Cllr :
Date: June 25, 2009 @ 10:56 am
I have read this thread and the pages of the Dagenham Post with mounting concern.I know the people involved, as I spent 20 years working with them.Barking CLP was, formerly, a fairly united and cohesive force, but it is apparent that the MP and her tragic statements before the 2006 local elections, is a devisive force.
The selection process conducted by the Regional Party was basically on the premiss that the Borough Labour Party was too incompetent to pick a decent set of candidates to fight the BNP.
What we have ended up with is a complete pigs ear, whereby the process has been used to settle old scores, and has spilled out into the public domain.
I have no doubt that some of the failed candidates weren’t very articulate or knowledgeable but they are local people who try their best but, in the process we have turned the local press against us (they were pretty angry about the loss of revenue since the Council decided to go into newspaper publishing anyway), and local people are turning against us because of what they read in the Post.
This could all have been scripted by the BNP.
Another Resident from Thames Ward :
Date: June 25, 2009 @ 11:27 am
I agree with Molly. Now that the initial furore has died down somewhat lets hope that this mood of rebellion can be sustained until the local elections some 10/11 months from now.
What I feel is very interesting is, that apart from Mr Alf Moore, who doesn’t seem to have quite grasped the severity of peoples feelings and what is actually going on here, and the only other commentee, Mr Ashley Singh, are the only two people who have anything good to say regarding the North Street Mafia. Not once has anyone praised George Shaw. Quite the contrary. Perhaps as old as he is, he will learn the lesson that one should keep their feuds and anger to themselves and not be quite so free in venting their feelings in public. To publicly attack a man who constantly turns the other cheek, and takes it on the chin with dignity, is reprehensible in the eyes of residents who know what good Fred Barnes and Joan Rawlinson have done in the past.
If his vendetta had not become quite so public, the backlash of the people might have passed him by. He has lost a lot of support from friends and supporters who have stuck by him for years. I have heard remarks such as ‘control freak’ and ‘he’s thrown his toys out of the pram’. Such goings on will not endear him to the people and it seems that respect for him has gone. It’s very sad, that someone who once was a valued Councilor, Leader of the Council and also Mayor of this Borough, should stoop so low with the dirty tricks.
You may have won this round, Mr Shaw, but I don’t think you have won the war. Next years elections will show the result of all this dirty dealing, and the Labour Party and Mrs M Hodge will surely regret the way they have treated Councillors who worked their socks off for this Borough and then were s… on from a great height.
I hope valuable lessons will be learned in the 2010 elections, if the BNP take over more seats in this Borough, because of the antics of George Shaw and Co.
Shame on you too Councillor Barry Poulton, who let the disgusting treatment of Fred Barnes go on in Public. You were the Chair of the meetings and should not have let it continue. Brown nosing will get you nowhere in the end, and don’t forget, come the elections you may well waiting find yourself waiting at your front gate, with no-one to talk to, because an un-elected Councillor is no longer a Councillor.
What will you both do then?
Ex LBBD Cllr :
Date: June 25, 2009 @ 11:43 am
One correction, George Shaw was never Council Leader, only Chair of Housing for many years.
A Very Very Angry Resident of Thames Ward: :
Date: June 25, 2009 @ 11:57 am
In Reply to : disillussioned resident :
Date: June 25, 2009 @ 10:55 am
Do you not think the truth should be told ?!
Do you not think us the residents have right to the knowledge of what sort of underhand dirty ticks have been going on behind closed doors ?!
Do you not think you may have double standards with you comment, As it’s Mr Shaw that has made personal public attacks, and your comment is not showing much respect for a well respected ward councillor like Fred Barns !
Have you never heard of the old saying ” people in glass houses should not throw stones ” .
Mr George Shaw has brought much shame to the Labour Party. If he has any sense he will resign as this fiasco will show in the ballot box in 2010 if Fred is not re-selected.
I gurantee that the residents of Thames Ward will no longer vote labour after this turn out and who can blame them. It should be the peoples choice and not that of Mr George Shaw whom is selected for re-selection in 2010.
Good luck to whom ever wins the next elections it’s anyones elections now. All the other partys will have to work hard to show they are not run by evil twisted oaps holding vendettas.
I SMELL THE COMMENTS BY :disillussioned resident ARE BEING LEFT BY CLLR BARRY POULTON ??
another ex-LBBD Councillor :
Date: June 25, 2009 @ 12:09 pm
I was an opposition member of the Council in the late 1980’s (that’s norrowed it down to 12 possibles then). I remember having to take my own Council to the Ombudsman regarding Housing policies and allocations. George Shaw as chair of the Housing Committee was thoroughly castigated by the Ombudsman who stated he run the Housing Service as his own ‘personal feifdom’. I personally remember him as a thoroughly unpleasant individual and a total control freak. I don’t think it was me, because I have retained and maintain friendships with people in Barking Labour Party to this day, including present and former Councillors. It’s upsetting, but not surprising, given the individuals involved, to see what’s happening withing the Labour Party in Barking. I hope there can be some resolution quickly, because the thought of a BNP led Council in my home town is to awful to contemplate ..
disillussioned resident :
Date: June 25, 2009 @ 12:22 pm
in reply to very angry resident, i AM NOT CLLR POULTON, these are the sort of replies that are making bad feelings worse, I agree that residents should be told the truth and personal vendettas should have ben sorted out before they got to this stage,I dont like to see anyone shafted for no reason, I cannot comment on the feud between cllr barnes and mr shaw or the involvement of cllr poulton,the situation has to be solved somehow,
being angry is one thing,making nasty personal attacks in the press is another, as you are only doing the same as those you have accused
no one is perfect,but try to act like normal human beings,I do hope you can get your problems sorted out
and wish you all the best, but please stop this nastiness.it doesnt solve anythng
Lynne, resident of Great Fleete :
Date: June 25, 2009 @ 12:25 pm
My father voted for Labour for most of his voting life & I think he would be ashamed of what is going on now, Bob Mellish was our MP and like Councillor Barnes he worked tirelessly for his constituents as does Fred Barnes. I have dealt with Fred for eight years regarding bike problem on Barking Riverside land & one sunday morning at least 50-60 bikes were at the back of my property, noise was horrendous and Fred was going out with his family (which he is entitled to do like most families) and he cancelled his trip to help deal with problem,which showed what a excellent councillor he is. I wonder if Councillor Poulton would have done the same, I have never seen him on our development to see if there is anything he can help with & as for Margaret Hodge she stopped me in Barking town centre, by the old bandstand, & asked If I knew who she was and I replied yes she then asked if there was anything she could help me with, I explained about the bike problem which I have been complaining to the Council, local neighbourhood meetings and Councillor Barnes (who has been the only one helping) she told me she knew nothing of this problem I told her this was brought up at her coffee morning meeting in Christcurch, she quite rudely turned around & walked away. I hope that common sense will prevail in this matter but do not hold much hope. As for George Shaw his policies died with the Ark & Cllr Poulton should not let George Shaw waffle on & let others have their say in Neighbourhood meetings as Cllr Poulton has shut me down very sharply & rudely. I pay my council tax and I am entitled to have my say regarding where I live.
close friend :
Date: June 25, 2009 @ 12:28 pm
We have just heard some more very good news, it appears that 2 very senior Labour Councillors have stated that they are not standing for selection.
Reason given we hear is that they are so disgusted with how their colleagues have been treated that they have no wish to be a part of it.
This is good news for us.
You might like to wonder why this is only happening in Barking. Its true that a couple of members in Dagenham were deselected, but, Dagenham is a closed shop to us we have made no inroads there at all. They are all totally loyal to one another and to their MP, so we went for the easy option.
And for us to sit back and watch this roll out is highly amusing, we do know that the Dagenham members are angry at how their colleagues are being treated but we wait to see if they or others will or can take any further action.
Just remember in Barking keep your friends close but your enemies closer. Ha
A Very Very Angry Resident of Thames Ward: :
Date: June 25, 2009 @ 12:38 pm
Reply to : disillussioned resident
I do not have the vendtta i am merely point out the facts for all to know !
you just have to read all the other comments to see how Mr George Shaw has rubbed many up the wrong way over the years ….. Rid him from the labour party along with cllr poulton (both are past there sell by dates).
power to cllr rawlinson & cllr barnes keep fighting !
Jane :
Date: June 25, 2009 @ 1:04 pm
I am so disappointed by the behaviour of some within the Barking CLP and I wish that I was in the Dagenham CLP as my address suggests I should be.
As an active member of the Barking CLP I am sick of listening to the ‘chosen few’ telling us at meetings that we should stop the in fighting and work together and then in the next breath say something inflammatory to insight the kind of argument that produces the atmosphere that they say they want to be rid of. If you bite back you are seen as the aggressor if you say nothing they get away with what ever they want.
Whilst the Barking Wards are all busy fighting amongst themselves the Dagenham CLP are very organised and are cherry picking any decent prospective Councillors for their Wards in Dagenham. Good luck to them. However that doesn’t help us who live and work in Barking. We will end up with the Hodge sycophants who in many cases don’t have a brain cell or opinion (unless its about black bags etc.) between them but will vote the right way and can just about read from the script written for them.
As a Labour Party member it hurts me to say it but I hope that those hard working councillors who have been deselected find the strength and the financial backing to stand as independants. Please don’t abandon us altogether.
Hopefully this will give those traditional Labour Party voters, who have, lets face it, a lot to be disappointed about lately, the opportunity to vote for the tried and tested councillors who have worked so hard for them in the past rather than throwing away votes to the fascist groups who will undoubtedly benefit from many protest votes and divide our communities even further.
so I say go for it Alok, Fred, Joan, John, Val and any other hard working Labour Councillor that I may have forgotton in my haste to get this written. If you were in my ward I would vote for you.
confused resident of Thames ward :
Date: June 25, 2009 @ 1:38 pm
I thought the government were trying to stamp out bullying within schools & workplace, what went wrong here? When I was at work you got recognition for good work obviously something has gone wrong within politics, is it a case of do as I say not as I do. Councillors who do good work get shunted and those who do less get praised, god help us at the next election.
Labour Party member :
Date: June 25, 2009 @ 1:46 pm
Does Gordon Brown read these reviews? It would be a good idea if this was brought to his attention & see what his reaction would be.
Concerned Teenager :
Date: June 25, 2009 @ 2:59 pm
I have just spent the last half hour reading all the comments that everyone has made, and I have this to say. By the sounds of things people are more concerned with playing chinese whispers and gossiping,(which I would like to add that is something you do when you are in school not fully grown adults) then coming together and fighting against the bnp!!!
Another Resident from Thames Ward :
Date: June 25, 2009 @ 3:03 pm
What we must also remember is that Fred Barnes cannot defend himself in this blog, and has to take his insulting treatment on the chin. As does Joan Rawlinson.
The fact that so many are shouting on their behalf speaks volumes.
I cannot see that this debate is doing Fred Barnes harm, it only proves to me how many people are enraged that one very silly old man can bully and harass to get his own way.
It is a pity that the chosen few from North Street have taken this path as it does indeed give the Labour party a bad name and leave a nasty taste in the mouths of the ordinary resident, who just wants a decent clean place to live.
Lets hope someone ‘up top’ can see what is happening and sort this mess out before it gets completely out of hand.
Another Resident from Thames Ward :
Date: June 25, 2009 @ 3:17 pm
Concerned Teenager
Far be it from to pull age and rank on someone of your tender teenage years, but I don’t think you quite realise what is happening here.
These are not Chinese whispers or gossip. They are cold hard facts that need to be told to all those concerned with keeping decent people as Councillors
Because of closed shops and dirty fighting the residents who vote are never told the truth of what goes on behind North Street doors, and they should be.
There has been some very dirty fighting, and you should think carefully before castigating these people as children.
It is because of all this dirty fighting that the BNP are revelling in the whole affair. Don’t blame the people giving their opinions, but instead read it all again and see that this is the only way that people can get their opinions heard.
Jane :
Date: June 25, 2009 @ 3:32 pm
Reply to the Concerned Teenager
You are quite right. There is a saying about ‘out of the mouths of babes’ I can’t quite remember the actual saying but it implies that you usually hear the truth.
Unfortunately this has been going on for so long many don’t know how to listen to reason or even debate any more they are so blinkered.
Ted of Thames Ward :
Date: June 25, 2009 @ 3:35 pm
Dear Concerned Teenager, I applaud the fact that you have taken the time to read all the comments, you have failed to understand however the concept of Chinese whispers. A Chinese whisper is when something is said by someone and gradually changed as it is repeated. You should note that the comments being made are very consistant.
Deborah :
Date: June 25, 2009 @ 3:46 pm
A message for the Concerned Teenager if you are a resident of Thames Ward I am sure that you will be aware how much cllr Fred Barns has done for the Youth on the ward. This is one reason residents dont want to lose him as their councillor. Keep interested in local politics more young voices are always appreciated but before the BNP can be overcome you have to deal with the problems in your local Labour Party and that is what people are trying to do.
Barking Resident :
Date: June 25, 2009 @ 3:55 pm
Talk about sleaze in the government, expenses and pensions etc. Come to our neck of the woods, Barking and Dagenham to find underhanded deals such as vendettas, control freaks,back stabbing etc. You name it we have got the lot, and that is just in our local Labour party. By the way have you heard the news? Barking and Dagenham have a new batch of immigrants decending on our doorstep. It’s not the europeans or asians etc but surprise surprise,BMP members from all over the country, knowing whats going on in our borough are renting flats staying with friends in order to reside in the borough for the qualifying period so as to be able to stand as candidated at the 2010 elections.
Take note Margaret Hodge, George Shaw and the local Labour Party in this borough.
Oh what a wonderous web we weave when first we venture to deceive.
Concerned Teenager :
Date: June 25, 2009 @ 4:03 pm
I am a resident of Alibon Ward.
Barking Man :
Date: June 25, 2009 @ 5:48 pm
YOU MUST ASK MR G SHAW TO STAND DOWN AS CHAIR OF THAMES WARD LABOUR PARTY THIS MUST BE DONE
close friend :
Date: June 25, 2009 @ 6:18 pm
In response to Barking Resident @3.55pm please dont even try going down that route of scare mongering. You should be looking at what is being done by the North Street mafia as you have named it.
Take a closer look at your increased membership, which incidentely goes against the trend anywhere else in the country (which should ring an alarm bell for you).
Go and stand outside when certain wards in the town centre have a meeting where a vote is needed, count how many mini buses turn up and how many people get out. And if you can get close enough to hear them speak you tell us if you recognise the midlands and north of england accents.
So please put your own house in order first.
And as for the teenager from Alibon Ward nice to hear from you again say hello to your relatives for us.
Keep your enemies closer
Disgusted Labour Party Member :
Date: June 25, 2009 @ 7:47 pm
Gordon Brown and the General Secretary of the Labour Party should hear and fully investigate this impartially. (Bearing in mind the London Labour Region are not impartial). Urgent disciplinary action needs to be taken and the offenders thrown out of the Party. Our Ward will be writing to the General Secretary asap. It is so sad to see our local Party crumbling in this manner. Perhaps the shortlisting and selection process needs to be completely done again in a fully supervised correct manner, without the interference and barriers we have had this time around.
Jackie :
Date: June 25, 2009 @ 8:37 pm
In response to Concerned teenager, can I please point out that we did not start this fight, it is not a fight that we wanted, needed or asked for. But, it is a fight that has been forced upon us by the North Street Mafia.
They drew the line in the sand, they are the ones that have had secret meetings where decisions have been made by people who were NOT elected to office within the party.
They are the ones who have corrupted Regional party officers and have bent them to their will.
Money has been thrown at this for months if not years, yet the ordinary member of the party has no written evidence of what we have in the bank.
There is a wise old saying about the great British public that we are slow to anger but when we do we fight hard and we fight to win.
We are not just fighting for individuals here we are fighting for the life of the party in Barking, the Labour party, which is something all of those in so called power in Barking know nothing about.
So please concerned teenager do take the time to listen and learn from both sides, and perhaps, just perhaps you may well agree that this was not a fight of our making.
Ex Labour Party Member [just torn up my card] :
Date: June 25, 2009 @ 10:31 pm
Since there is such extreme concern regarding how the short listing of Councillors for Thames Ward was conducted on Thursday 18th June the outcome MUST be declared null and void and another meeting MUST be convened to short list the Councillors that we the people want to serve us and not influenced by a personal vendetta
In my opinion the Labour Party has had its day – enough is enough
For example –
MP’s Expenses – A furore over the exhorbitant expenses they claimed and were PAID by us the tax payer
MP’s Pension – Debating to give THEMSELVES an increase in their alreadY golden Pension which would cost us [the people they purport to work for] £800.000 and the MP’s a mere £67 per mpnth from their overstuffed wage packets
The Labour Party cannot continue to ignore the people , they MUST put right the farce which was enacted at the short listing for Thames Ward Councillors on the 18th June
Irate & Disgusted Resident of Thames Ward :
Date: June 25, 2009 @ 11:02 pm
At the short listing of Councillors for Thames Ward on the 18th June six people voted Cllr Barns off – the 1st 2nd and 3rd voters being George Shaw and his wife and daughter – votes 4 & 5 were by two men [neighbours of G Shaw] who have never ever attended a Ward meeting to my knowledge nor met Fred Barns ever – the sixth voter was a female who would wear her shoes on her head if G Shaw told her to
Six voted Cllr Poulton off – then George Shaw used a casting vote as Chair [though it is doubtful that this is allowed by BLP rules] to get Cllr Barns off & Cllr Poulton to stand – if this had been for the benefit of Thames Ward I dont think I would have felt so angry as I do now however it was nothimg so noble as that , it was purely to fuel George Shaw’a hatred for Cllr Barns and to satisfy his love of dictatorship – he is a megalomaniac whose motto is ‘dont do what I do , do what I say’
Well thanks George Shaw you have now landed us all with the ‘village idiot’ who is known locally as a wannabe Womble – all I can say is that George Shaw and Cllr Poulton deserve each other as they both like to hear the sound of their own voice – neither worry about who they stab in the back – I have even witnessed them back stabbing each other
So! well done George Shaw you have succeeded where Maggie Thatcher failed you have brought the BLP to its knees – Hope you are proud of yourself
Concerned Teenager :
Date: June 26, 2009 @ 2:44 am
Close Friend : Could I please ask what relatives you are talking about ?
Robert :
Date: June 26, 2009 @ 7:12 am
Seems a lot of people in this area write with the same style…
Barking Girl Born and Bred :
Date: June 26, 2009 @ 7:27 am
Reply to Robert Yes I agree a lot of people in this area are writing with the same style. These Barking people speak as they find and speak the truth not making it up to suck up to Margaret Hodge and her croanies. Makes you wonder if G Shaw is really acting like a true Barking resident! Be proud of where you come from and how you speak and write!!!!
close friend :
Date: June 26, 2009 @ 7:49 am
In response to Concerned teenager, do you really want me to name names, or, shall I just give you some references?
Several months ago during one of the elections our car was driving round the borough with our A frame ad board, on that board we gave advertising space to a v. local company run by a well known resident in Alibon ward – any relative?
Caravan camp?
Any more hints needed?
Keep your enemies closer
Disgusted Resident of Thames Ward :
Date: June 26, 2009 @ 9:11 am
Come and show your support for Cllr Fred Barns & Cllr Joan Rawlinson.
On Sunday 5th July 2009
at 11am
Venue : Mobility Shop inside the Vicarage Field Shopping Centre on upper level
Come and let the Labour Party know your views that we want Fred & Joan!
Colin Resident of Thames Ward :
Date: June 26, 2009 @ 9:38 am
Can anyone tell how one man {Chair of the labour party} be allowed to break voting rules & being as the rules was broken why has the short listing for the selection not been re-done ASAP ??
please Mr Brown if you read this can you answer this question !
How can our faith be restored in the labour party now.
I can see this being national news with all this public support for these hard working councillors that have been badly treated in our borough.
Jackie :
Date: June 26, 2009 @ 12:57 pm
Can I please ask that if you are proposing to protest on Saturday that you also include an invite to the residents on other wards whose councillors have unfairly and corruptly been deselected, the wards are Becontree Cllr Agrawal, Gascoigne Cllr Val Rush, and it seems Cllr McKenzie has been shifted at the North street mafias request to Dagenham, Valance Cllr Don Hemmett.
As show of combined strength is what works best.
Jackie :
Date: June 26, 2009 @ 1:10 pm
My apologies, I have just been informed that I left some names off the list, and I dont believe we would want any of these to be ignored.
Cllr Warren Northover Goresbrook ward who successfully campaigned to ensure that Labour had 1 seat in that ward.
Cllr Pat Northover Eastbury ward who successfully saw off not only the BNP but the Liberals I am told, and there is the case of Cllr Jeanne Alexander who lives in Abbey ward and has tirelessly served that ward as a Councillor for 15 years she is now also being forced out.
So please think of all involved.
disillussioned resident :
Date: June 26, 2009 @ 1:59 pm
it seems that Jackie is nothing more than a trouble maker,i wonder how she gets her information and who from
as she clearly does not have all the facts,most residents in goresbrook
would not agree that warren northover ,was a good cllr,he rarely attended any meetings,when he did he seemed to fall asleep,he never gave apologies for abscence, and hardly ever communicated with the community over the last couple of years so we dont think he was unfairly deselected
as for the others,who knows the reasons why.JACKIES outcrys seem a little suspect,as do some of the other letters,it seems someone is doing a little stirring of the fire
it will not solve anything but more bad feelings and alienate even mre people,forcing them to take sides and divide the communities more,what a sad outcome that would be for everyone,and a good one for the BNP
SHAME ON YOU
molly :
Date: June 26, 2009 @ 4:03 pm
It seems as though this site has been just as busy today with more people still showing their support for councillors they feel were unfairly deselected.
It looks like you have also been joined by a troll from the North Street Mafia, I am referring to the disillusioned resident who posted @ 1.59pm.
Why use the word suspect when someone puts a reasonable point of view over, isnt that what democracy is all about listening to others points of view without reacting in this manner and attacking anyone who disagrees with them.
Reading through the numerous posts on here that seems to be the thread all of the way through the residents, the ones who actually put their X’s on the ballot paper are telling the Labour Party loud and clear that they want these people on the ballot paper, these are the people they will vote for, and it is a foolish party that ignores that message.
As for this persons reference to the posters on here handing the borough to the BNP I would suggest that the only people that are going to do that are the Mafia.
So please do not attack people for putting what they feel needs to be said on here, there is no shame in it, and in fact it is far better to have this out in the open than in the dark where plots and conspiracy always fester.
disillussioned resident :
Date: June 26, 2009 @ 4:59 pm
IN reply to molly, arent you condradicting yourself, arent you attacking everyone at north st, most had nothing to do with what has happened, by referring im a troll,you dont evenknow me,I have not belittled or slagged of any of the people who believe an injustice has been done, I agree that things should be out in the open and sorted out properly, but to tar eveyone with the same brush is morally wrong
and inciting a divide and attacking everyone else because they dont sing from the same hymn sheet as you is just as bad,I HAVE read all the comments and not all of them are from residents,as always when these sort of things happen ,you get a a small amount of mindless morons who will use the situation to cause trouble,lets face it the last few letters wasntanything to do with the original protest, it seems they want to disrupt the whole borogh
you believe what you want to, its yuor choice,but dont attack everyone
at north st or else where who had no part in any decisions made .
Another Resident from Thames Ward :
Date: June 26, 2009 @ 5:00 pm
Lets also remember that the people making their comments on this site are predominantly Thames Ward Residents and it is up to the people in the other wards to fight for their own councillors.
Whatever or whoever, it is still the North Street Mafia who have caused this furore. I wonder if anyone has pointed George Shaw in the direction of this site. Perhaps if he could read these comments he would realise what he has done to his own reputation.
Finally, everyone is entitled to their own views, and this country does have free speech.
The Overall Picture :
Date: June 26, 2009 @ 5:31 pm
It seems the dear lady, Margaret Hodge wants total control of Barking & Dagenham Council. She wants to control 6 wards out of the 11. The 6 on the “Hit List” are Abbey, Gascoigne, Thames, Becontree, Longbridge and Eastbury. If she gets 18 of her Councillors elected she controls the Council. It very much looks as though she will get her way, that is why they got rid off Alok from Becontree, Jeanne from Abbey, Val from Gascoigne, Fred from Thames and others. They will be replaced by Laila Butt, Darren Rodwell, Dominic Twomey, Chris and Linda Rice and others. God Help Us !
Ashley SIngh :
Date: June 26, 2009 @ 6:14 pm
It’s disappointing that “The Overall Picture” as has many other people who have chosen to comment on this article have done so without having the nerve to put their name next to what they believe in. However they are very quick to name other people in their comments without their expressed permission or even make sure the points being made are actually factual.
I think for the greater good of the Labour Party in Barking and Dagenham that these discussion need to take place in the remits that are available. If rules are being broken then let the proof be forthcoming. For those residents whom are not part of the labour party you have the choice next May who you want to vote for based on who the parties put forward. If you were so concerned previously then maybe you should have joined so you had a voice.
There is little that can be done now by forum discussions like these and local paper reports other then to damage the labour party as a whole and both our MPs. The only people that will benefit will be the ones we should be fighting – the BNP.
Unfortunatly from what I can make out this whole debate hasn’t been about politics or policy but about personalities, and that those who should be taking these comments on board for the greater good of Barking and Dagenham will only seek to criticise them. For anyone that is a sitting councilor they should have the experience to know better, and those who are hoping to be elected need to learn fast.
Despite what differences you might have with somebody and their poltics I think that the timing of this article has been in bad taste as regardless of what we think of Margaret Hodge we should have at least some respect for her and her family who are greiving the loss of a husband and father.
As the last commenter pointed out – GOD HELP US overcome our differences for the greater good of residents
del :
Date: June 26, 2009 @ 7:21 pm
A couple of days catching up to do this evening, and I have to say that it only takes one or two flies in the ointment for healthy debate and discussion to turn into a slanging match.
It does appear that disillusioned resident appears to take offence at anyone who attacks North Street or the practices operating out of there labeling all who are not in that camp but support their councillors as “mindless morons” How would he/she be able to tell that all who post on here are not residents?
And as for Ashley Singh, I dont believe there is any need to involve Dagenham in this matter, I believe that it has already been mentioned in a previous post that Dagenham are totally separate from Barking when it comes to these matters.
AS then goes onto tell us that he/she can see no further need for this or articles in the local paper to continue. Well that is one view point I suppose, I am pretty sure the Labour Party would love it if everybody shut up and let themselves be walked over, and as for raising the matter of damage to the party, are you for real? do you not read the national newspapers, do you not recognize the mortal damage that has already been done to the party by MPs and others, please rest assured this matter in Barking may very well just put a suffering animal to rest.
But at the same time could give rise to a more democratic party that is prepared as the majority of people who have posted on here to be open and honest. which listens to its voters, and has the courage to say we were wrong, we misjudged the mood of the electorate, and thereby re-instate those members who have been de-selected and start to bring back a true Labour Party to Barking.
Another Resident from Thames Ward :
Date: June 26, 2009 @ 10:34 pm
Well said del (above comment 7.21p.m.
There are people posting on here that have irrefutable first hand evidence of what went on at the selections on 18th June, but for various reasons cannot dare to give their own names.
They would like to, but prudence says they mustn’t. However they still want the truth to be known.
MEW (Barking) :
Date: June 26, 2009 @ 10:43 pm
Regarding Mr Ashley Singh
Were you there on the 18th. If you were why are you trying to stop people having their say, and the papers from reporting what went on?
If you weren’t there, I suggest you keep your your silly mouth shut.
Mary Fields (Dagenham resident) :
Date: June 27, 2009 @ 4:43 am
As a resident in Dagenham for 30 years I am surprised at some of the comments I’ve read. I don’t know about the others, but Margaret Hodge is a hard working local MP. She does lots for the local area and she has people who knock on doors and listen to what we have to say. I hadn’t heard from anyone in the local Labour Party for 20 years until a couple of years ago. It’s about time the local Labour Party started to listen. Good luck to her.
Neither I nor my friends have met any of the councillors who have been named. They haven’t knocked on our doors. The BNP have – twice. They won’t be getting my vote but that’s because of my renewed confidence in the work I see being done by Margaret Hodge.
Keep going Margaret. You have the support of ordinary residents of this borough – who are the silent majority. We’re the ones that matter.
Resident :
Date: June 27, 2009 @ 7:57 am
Support our hardworking cllr Fred Barns
Say NO Fred NO Vote to Labour !
Details of where to get your window poster will be posted on here later today
disillussioned resident :
Date: June 27, 2009 @ 8:34 am
window posters??
what next,t shirts,badges, mugs,
a spot on the jeremy kyle show,
just shows how ridiculous this is all
getting
GROW UP
YOURE SUPPOSED TO BE ADULTS NOT SCHOOLCHILDREN
Ash Singh :
Date: June 27, 2009 @ 9:31 am
The reason that I am writing on this forum is because I am truly dedicated to getting the BNP out of Barking and Dagenham. I am fed up to the back teeth of this ongoing saga, and the rudeness of some of those involved. I can’t stress enough in my comments that the party members should be talking to each other through the right methods that are available and there ARE things available rather then this forum and the local press. It’s not about democracy or hiding things from the public, but the fact that we are damaging our party. The BNP are laughing at Labour’s inability to communicate with each other, and sort out our own politics without washing our dirty laundry in public. They really do have the upper hand at the moment. I have decided not to continue contributing to these discussions as the majority of comments being made are those who are fighting their own agendas and not for the good of our party or our borough. My family and I will continue in our work on the ground to try and undo the damage that is going on to prevent the BNP gaining more support and hope that as many of you as possible will join us rather then using every opportunity to slate each other. Come 2010 lets hope we wont all be hanging our heads in shame as the first BNP council take control.
del :
Date: June 27, 2009 @ 9:56 am
Well it certainly looks as though people have got up early this morning.
We say goodbye to Ash Singh who obviously realises that he/she has lost their argument, there is mention of our party and our borough, well the Labour Party has always been a broad church, and has always encouraged debate, and why shouldnt people who firmly believe they have been treated unjustly speak where they can, and why cannot their supporters do the same. There is obviously no forum within the Barking Party for this to happen.
And once again we have disillusioned resident who it seems cannot construct a coherent sentance but hurls abuse, I should imagine this is the style at the party meetings.
And then finally we have Mary from Dagenham, now it seems Mary really likes M Hodge and thinks she is capable of turning water into wine, but the question Mary should be asking is WHY is M Hodge canvassing in Dagenham, why is she and Barking party working in any Dagenham wards?
The boundary changes do not come into place until 2010 and in fact M Hodge and Barking party are in breach of the protocol rules in that they have canvassed and obviously worked in another MPs constituency, in fact if you check on M Hodge website she actually states it on there.
So Mary please dont get carried away just yet.
David of Dagenham :
Date: June 27, 2009 @ 10:37 am
A mate of mine has just sent me a link to this. I’m interested in joining the Labour Party.
What a joke!
These councillors on a basic of £10,006. Some of them mentioned are getting £17,510 on top of this. But we’ve never seen any of them. They don’t knock on doors and I’ve never received a leaflet from one of them.
Now, when their necks are on the line they suddenly want an audience.
Barking Labour Party must be doing something right – at last!
I don’t want the BNP running my community.
If Labour can demonstrate locally that it’s finally getting its act together, count me in.
Sick to the back teeth of Labour! :
Date: June 27, 2009 @ 12:02 pm
I urge all the councillors that were deselected to stand as independent. They would definately get back into the ward they were kicked out of.
We all know this was a fix, that’s for sure, so fight back and win win win!!
Helal Uddin :
Date: June 27, 2009 @ 12:53 pm
I think the councillors should be selected for election on their merit basis other then any other grounds e.g.supporting friends, family etc etc etc.
As far as I am concerned as a resident in Thames ward the most supported councillor were Fred Barns and I am very disappointed to learn that Fred were deselected, and at the same time I am pleased that the selection panel accepted his appeal.
As a community activist I will urge the relevant personals, authorities and others involved in the selection process to make sure a winning cadidate to be selected to avoid a BIG disappointment by losing all or most seats to the BNP candidates.
As a labour party suppoter I will be happy to see the local selected councillors to win in the next year’s election. Fred is a very likely winning cadidate in Thames Ward.
Many Thanks.
Backing Fred All The Way :
Date: June 27, 2009 @ 1:43 pm
I see from recent comments that Margaret Hodge and her followers are reading this, taking note (I hope )and from what I see having to but nasty comments on to boost themselves. In reply to whatever a councillor earns, if they are as hard working as Fred Barns is for Thames Ward ie availiable 24/7 they are worth it. Lets remember Fred has not asked for this. The residents are the ones forging ahead we are the ones who are disgusted with the way he has been treated. First he was deselected which had to be reversed on appeal because the allegations did not hold up ( even though Margaret Hodge had announced it to Thames residents that they would be getting a new councillor ) then because George Shaws vendetta not being selected as a candidate for Thames Ward. So please dont insult Fred more by saying he is making a fuss now because of his salary as a councillor. If thats your only defence for this its a disgrace. Keep your head held high Fred your constituants are behind you. Pity Labour cant see they are missing out on much needed votes on Thames Ward.
Sam ( Barking Thames Ward) :
Date: June 27, 2009 @ 2:10 pm
In reply to Mary fields (dagenham Residents) early morning entry I am very suprised to hear Margaret Hodge is Knocking on doors in Dagenham as she is not your MP she is ours in Barking dear oh dear! Also you would surley not be expecting to have our thames Ward councillor Fred Barns knocking on your dagenham door when he is busy working for us in barking. Lets remember from earlier comments Barking Labour Party and Dagenham Labour Party are seperate and it would seem Margaret Hodge wants to get her cronies into Barking Wards. So back to the origanal points Thames Ward residents want the injustices reversed in this selection process and Fred Barns to be our Candidate for councillor at the next election. Also in reply to the earlier comment we are not schoolchildren we are adults and unlike some of you dont have large budgets to promote ourselves we are doing what we can and let the snowball effect keep rolling. We want Fred Barns as our councillor.
Baffled from Dagenham :
Date: June 27, 2009 @ 3:52 pm
I am not an extremely political person but I have read the comments on this site with interest. Am I wrong in thinking that the aim of ANY political party is the try and dispel the main threat , which in the case of Barking and Dagenham is the BNP. Therefore shouldn’t the Labour Party be pulling together to try and defeat the enemy instead of making enemies within their own army?
Perhaps the Councillors who have been deselected could put some of their time, knowledge and experience into encouraging the new Councillors to carry on with all the positive things that they themselves have acheived over the years, and try to discourage them from falling into the trap of making disparaging remarks and having personality clashes made public. Everyone has differences of opinions but these should be left in the classroom and not brought out into the playground.
Not everyone will agree with the comments posted by a disillusioned resident but they were short and to the point, he or she was perhaps saying what some people were thinking
but have not had the courage to say them.
Sam (Barking Thames Ward) :
Date: June 27, 2009 @ 4:37 pm
To Baffled from dagenham I dont see any comments from Cllr Fred Barns on here so I dont think your comment about discouraging councillors from making disparaging remarks is fair.
As far as I know residents of thames Ward do still have freedom of speech.
As for giving advise to new candidates I am sure they have had enough coaching from there sponser Margaret Hodge.
I would agree that the main aim of any political party is to dispel its main threat but unfortunately for Labour on Thames ward that is Margaret Hodge and her side kick George Shaw. Please keep to the facts and help us get the barking labour party to accept the foul play that has been done here in Thames Ward.
Resident :
Date: June 27, 2009 @ 4:55 pm
Reply to: disillussioned resident :
Date: June 27, 2009 @ 8:34 am
It would seem it is people like you whom give these sites a bad name ( this is being used in the right way letting local people have a say!!)
Please stay off this site as your stupid comments are not required or i will name whom you are and the other names you are also using to spout your rubbish.
TO EVERYONE ELSE THAT HAS USED THIS SITE IN RESPONSIBLE WAY …… GOOD ON YOU WE NEED TO GET OURS VIEWS HEARD LOUD & CLEAR AND I WOULD LIKE TO LET YOU KNOW WE DO HAVE THE LABOUR PARTY RUNNING SCARED ! , AND RIGHTLY SO THIS IS NOT GOING TO GO AWAY TILL THE SELECTION VOTE IS RE-CAST.
Disillusioned :
Date: June 27, 2009 @ 5:55 pm
I am totally disillusioned with both local and central government, and their dirty dealings. A cynic once said that a democracy is a place where you are free to do as you are told. How true this is of the Barking Constituency Labour Party! I for one will not be renewing my Labour Party membership.
disillussioned resident :
Date: June 27, 2009 @ 6:40 pm
in reply to resident
since when has this site been owned by you.ITS OPEN TO ANY ONE WHO WISHES TO MAKE A COMMENT,whether for fred or against,as for giving the site a bad name.judging by the furore ,some people have already done that for their own aims.
as for naming me . then go on have a go, at the sametime try naming yourself,and i have not used any other names, so think again
Sammi Gascoigne campaign for Val Group :
Date: June 27, 2009 @ 6:42 pm
I do hope the residents from Thames do not mind me posting on here in support of Val and keeping you up to date with what we are doing.
Like yourselves we have a massive petition ongoing, people and groups who Val has helped along the way overr the last 15 years are contacting us and signing up. We have also been made aware that there is a large petition being collected among the trade unions.
We are also in the process of collecting evidence of the lies, and mis-leading evidence that has been presented to London Region and spread around by North Street. We have had a lot of help on this some of which has been from a most unexpected source, certainly the evidence collected about the person who wants to replace her on the ward is very explosive.
We also have a fighting fund, people in the Borough are really generous especially if its to help a person they really do care about.
We have also sought independent legal advice, and have found that even in the policies and procedures of the Labour Party they are still required to operate within the Human Rights Act, and cannot therefor discriminate on disability, like they first tried with Fred, sexism, or race. And it has been reported to us that there has been a breach of party rules on these last 2 grounds.
We will continue to campaign for Val and one way or another she will be our Councillor on the Gascoigne, and take note Labour No Val No Vote for Labour.
David of Dagenham :
Date: June 28, 2009 @ 10:47 am
This is confusing.
One minute we have support being expressed for one, and then the next minute another one jumps in to say “don’t forget me!”
Methinks there be division within the camp.
Isn’t it time we were told what these councillors really think from THEM directly?
Let the record show that we have asked them to respond.
“Are you going to stand as independents?”
Don’t keep claiming the councillors’ allowances while hiding behind others making statements in your name.
We want to know what YOU think?
Do you support the campaign for you to stand as an independent, Mrs Rush?
Well, do you?
The tax payers of this Borough deserve to know.
Julie Munroe :
Date: June 28, 2009 @ 11:19 am
I do wish that people would stop remarking on these red herrings on here as we all know that their is a very fishy smell and the whole system of selection process stinks. I am not ashamed to put my name to my comment as We need to stop these distractions and stick to our original reasons which is to make people aware that Cllr Fred Barns was allowed to be unfairly treated by one person holding a vendetta ( chair of labour party Mr George Shaw ), As a direct result of the corruption on the evening of 18th June selection panel meeting Our harding working councillor Mr Fred Barns will not be standing to represent the Thames Ward in 2010 elections ( please see this weeks POST for full story) The whole process needs to be re-cast in the proper way without further delay.
Many of us on Thames Ward have known Fred Barns for many years from back when he was a long standing borough officer working tirelessly for the community and youth of this ward , He has a proven track record and has been our ward councillor for the last 2 elections and has been a loyal labour party member , hardworking, capable, efficient, councillor whom is an asset to the labour party he has not only attracted the most votes on the ward elections over the past years but this in it’s self must speak volumes to the labour party. I believe in the old saying “if it ain’t broke don’t fix it” ask yourself why would we want to change to the unknown of new councillors in this ward.
Lets support Cllr Fred Barns and make sure the the labour party stick to the rules and cast the whole selection process again.
Remember it is us the residents of this ward whom pay our hard earned money to live in Thames ward , we pays our money let us make our choice of whom we want to work as councillors on this ward !!! ( i am not staying don’t select new members to stand along side our current hardworking councillors as the ballot box will say whom we the people want !!) if Labour do not see this huge mistake that has been allowed to happen by one mans error’s and personal issues this could be the end for labour in this ward and that would be a shame.
**advice**for the people in other wards whom have problem with the loss of councillors you need to contact the post & tribune and other news papers get your voices heard this will really help good luck
Julie Munroe :
Date: June 28, 2009 @ 11:30 am
REPLY TO : David Dagenham
I am not sure if you are aware but under labour party rules a current serving councillor is not allowed to comment or remark on any of these issues or questions, as they will have their whip taken away.
It is up to us the residents of barking & dagenham to campaign on behalf of our councillors and make sure they are re-selected to stand in 2010 elections as they are powerless to fight this war on de-selection.
As i like you pays my money so i want to take my choice.
good luck
Sammi Gascoigne campaign for Val Group :
Date: June 28, 2009 @ 12:46 pm
Can I respond to David in Dagenham and also thank Julie Munroe in Thames Ward for pointing out to David what the rules are.
David you have obviously not read the article that set off this thread, there were a number of councillors mentioned in the article, J Denyer, F Barns and Val Rush plus it was noted that others had also been deselected.
So to try and stir things up with supporters of different members is a very stupid and silly thing to do, there is no split in the camp and you put it, information, ideas and suggestions can and will be suggested across the campaigns, a lot of residents on the Gascoigne know Fred Barns through his work as the Principal youth officer and also the support he gave in the ward during his time as Mayor and Dep Mayor, in the same way as a lot of residents in Thames will know Val Rush.
So your very stupid attempt to provoke a row is just that a stupid attempt.
And if as you say you are considering joining the Labour Party as a resident of Dagenham you will of course come under Dagenham CLP and not Barking, and what we are being told and I am sure Thames are to is that party members and councillors are very supportive of Fred and Val, so we wouldnt advise you to go to a party meeting over there shouting your mouth of like this.
CLLR JOHN DENYER :
Date: June 28, 2009 @ 1:23 pm
To say the least I am disappointed at being deselected by the Labour Party. I believe I have supported them well during my time in Office and being refused on the grounds of “Lack of Canvessing” and lack of understanding of Equalities matters is somewhat dubious. Is it that they wanted me out because I did not
blindly follow the party line and put the causes of those residents that elected me first is not for me to say but when I look at the other sitting councillors who have been deselected I am proud to be part of that group!
I will be standing in the 2010 elections not to spite Labour but to support the residents that have supported me since 2002.
Labour London Office appear to be working to a different agenda to what the public want, or expect, of them.
I may not be re-elected but I am sure that the vast majority of of those selected to stand as Labour candidates because the blindly follow like lemmings will not be elected either and the only people that will suffer will be the residents of Barking & Dagenham who deserve far better from a party that they have supported since before the War (the 2nd NOT BLAIR’S)
Jane :
Date: June 28, 2009 @ 2:26 pm
Well Done John. If you were in my ward I would vote for you. I have always found you to be a hard working and decent man who has the best interests of the many and the Borough.
Sam (Barking Thames Ward) :
Date: June 28, 2009 @ 4:12 pm
My sympathy goes to all those councillors who were deselected at the hands of the Labour party. It definately seems strings were being pulled to get rid of anyone whos face did not fit with Margaret Hodge.
I hope your campaigns are sucessful.
I agree the origanal article in the tribune was mainly about this corrupt process however since that went to press our fight in Thames Ward does go deeper.
SO please remember Fred Barns was one of the councillors deselected but unlike Val and John he went on to win his appeal and would have been allowed to stand as a labour Councillor candidate in Thames Ward. Something he was proud to do.
However the local labour Party were not going to let that happen so took it upon themselves (back to George Shaw and his croanies)to make sure Freds name was not going to be on the shortlist of candidates for Thames ward.
Hopefully all can see the real injustice thats been done here a double kick in the teeth for our Fred and Thames ward.
I must just add if this is not true how come George Shaw has not come forward to defend this outrage or indeed Margaret Hodge not put a stop to this.
David of Dagenham :
Date: June 28, 2009 @ 4:50 pm
John Denyer has stated what he intends to stand as an independent. He has shown he has some convictions.
This whip thing sounds like it’s being used as a smoke screen.
If it is something that you have to abide by if you are a member of a group of councillors but you don’t intend to be part of that group, then surely it no longer applies to you?
We deserve to know where the other councillors stand. Are they with John, or not?
You must see that you cannot keep drawing down the salary of being councillor under one banner if you don’t intend to stand under that banner.
Where stand you, Mrs Rush and Mr Barns?
Do you support John Denyer in his principled stand?
The taxpayers who pay your salaries need to know.
Jackie :
Date: June 28, 2009 @ 5:29 pm
It is very strange how David from Dagenham keeps going on about Members pay, and how as a taxpayer he demands certain rights.
Is he really a council taxpayer? And if he lives in Dagenham as he states why does what is going on in Barking party have anything to do with him.
It looks very much to me as if David, if that is his real name, is a North Street Troll and is trying without any success to provoke a slanging match or a response from councillors who unlike others at North Street are working to the rules and maintaining a dignified silence.
I would suggest that perhaps David needs to crawl back into his hole and realise that there are some servants of their community who will not enter into his row, such as Fred and Val and the others mentioned in the original story. What John Denyer has decided to do is his own business and as such we should all respect his choice.
mustaq ahmed :
Date: June 28, 2009 @ 5:38 pm
We in Barking are very ashamed at what some of our peoples are doing. We realy do like and support our councilors jean alexander and next door val rush.
But some peoples have said that they want there positions they wants them for all of the wrong reasons not to do good for the peoples in Barking but for themselfs.
the woman who is trying to force out mrs jean is a bad woman and brings shame on her family and on Islam and we have tried to talk to her but she will not listens to us.
the same it is with man and woman forcing out mrs val they is bad peoples
so we now say we will not support this we will note vote for these bad peoples and we will not have our centre used for politics meetings this is bring shame on all of us.
Rose from The View :
Date: June 28, 2009 @ 5:46 pm
I am an ordinary resident from Thames View. I’ve voted Labour all my life. I’ve never heard of Valerie Rush.
I am proud to have supported Mrs Hodge and Jo Richardson before her.
I’ve lived on Thames View all my life. For much of this time George Shaw represented me as my local councillor. All my friends and neighbours knew where to turn to when we needed help. He is a decent and honourable man who has given much of his life to serve our community. He is also a Freeman of the Borough.
I also have respect for Mrs Rawlinson. I am sorry her name has not gone forward but she seems to have more sense than to get involved in this silly nonsense.
I have not met Mr Barns. I wish him well. I do not doubt that others have reason to support him. But I have read the number of votes cast for him and it turns out it was less than half a dozen. On that basis, he should stand aside.
A thorn in roses side :
Date: June 28, 2009 @ 6:41 pm
In reply to “Rose” thank you for wishing Fred Barns well. As to the number of votes cast for him on shortlisting night I am afraid you are misled. There were in fact 6 votes for and 6 votes against.
take it from someone who was present the 6 votes against were Chairman George Shaw his wife Olive his daughter Pam his friend Christine and two of his neighbours who have never attended a ward meeting before or even met fred.
As it was a tie George Shaw took it upon himself to have the casting vote therefore cllr Barns was knocked of the shortlist by one vote.
Two other supporters of Cllr Fred Barns were not allowed into the meeting to cast their vote on a technicality which is being disputed and a complaint lodged.
Another Resident from Barking :
Date: June 28, 2009 @ 8:34 pm
What everyone seems to be forgetting is that the Labour Party is not in question here, nor the selection process.
The facts are that the selection process was used by one man and dirty tricks to rid Thames View of a very popular Councillor, who he has a personal hatred for. It was used for a personal vendetta, and this is morally wrong. Therefore, the point is that Thames Ward residents are angry because the process was not used to better the residents, but just to satisfy George Shaw and his henchman Barry Poulton’s spite against Fred Barnes.
THAT IS THE WHOLE ISSUE.
The selection process should NEVER have been used as a personal vendetta, and brings the Labour Party and the local Ward Panel into disrepute. Especially if it is fact that the Chair of the selection committee is not allowed a vote. Funny that George Shaw was the Chair and chose to break the rules.
Other Councillors in other wards are not involved, and if their ward constituents feel strongly enough then they are probably fighting their own battle in their own wards.
The reason that Fred Barnes and Joan Rawlinson have not got involved in this discussion is that they are not allowed to under the rules of their remit. That is why they are forced to keep silent. Apart from that Fred Barnes is not a vengeful person, and has acted throughout this whole affair with great dignity. Neither is Joan Rawlinson.
Perhaps all the contributors to this debate should remember the basic facts.
A personal vendetta of hatred for one man against another was used, and not the democratic process.
night shift worker from Barking :
Date: June 29, 2009 @ 3:11 am
While I salute and applaud the residents from across the different wards in Barking who are campaigning to keep the Councillors who have worked hard for them and who they trust and respect, please do not loose sight of the bigger picture.
While it is true that G Shaw subverted the rules to make sure that his personal vendetta against Fred won through. Chairmans lies and abuse of the process in Gascoigne against Val Rush.All part of the bigger plot cooked up by North street in her attempt to control
night shift worker from Barking :
Date: June 29, 2009 @ 5:50 am
PS sorry had to break off emergency at work,
….in her attempt to control the council.
She and her minions at North Street made promises to people that they would get them elected to the council, the North street mafia have targetted certain people and wards and have played the dirtiest game going, they have smeared good councillors such as Fred, Joan, Jean, Val and Alok, and then they have planted their people in positions in their wards.
So while I do understand the anger directed at G Shaw by Thames residents, the Chair by Gascoigne residents, this is a much bigger picture, and one that will do incredible damage to our borough if we allow it to continue.
Thames ward resident :
Date: June 29, 2009 @ 10:00 am
night shift worker from Barking :
Date: June 29, 2009 @ 5:50 am
In reply to above.
I do not think that the labour party know the amount of damage they have done to the party as a whole.
The labour party’s reputation has been damaged beyond repair ………… many of the north street trolls have indeed been stabbing each other in back and Mr G Shaw has been used to bait the honey trap as it is he whom has damaged his own once good reputation in the process of stabbing Cllr Barns & Cllr Rawlinson in the back.
I agree with the comments on here that the labour party will not win new seat in barking but indeed lose many in this unfair process as people will not forgive or forget and the post will not be next weeks chip paper
Labour Loud and Proud :
Date: June 29, 2009 @ 10:06 am
Poison, hatred and guff. How many of you people knock on doors, deliver leaflets or take an active role in your local community? Next to none, doing next to nothing, no doubt.
molly :
Date: June 29, 2009 @ 12:59 pm
With reference to the very brief and vitriolic comments by Labour Loud and Proud.
Why does it always seem that any postings on here that appear to come from the North street mafia are abusive and nasty.
How can this person who has posted possibly know the work that these councillors have put in, and certainly not just on one morning a week.
Please unless you can post in a sensible manner then dont bother coming on here with your abuse.
VOTE FRED & JOAN ALL THE WAY :
Date: June 29, 2009 @ 6:48 pm
In reply to :Labour Loud and Proud :
Date: June 29, 2009 @ 10:06 am
I agree with Molly 100% why does the north street troll have to post such abusive comments .
Yes we do know how much councillor Fred Barns does for Thames ward by delivering leaflets and takes a very active roll in the community even with his disability he works very hard for Thames ward and is seen almost daily as does Cllr Joan Rawlinson do the same ………… BUT THE SAME CAN’T BE SAID FOR CLLR BARRY POULTON ( HE DOES NOT EVEN HOLD A REGULAR SURGERY IT’S BY APPIONTMENT ONLY THAT IS IF YOUR LUCKY AND HE RETURNS YOUR CALL !!) THE ONLY THING WE EVER SEE CLLR POULTON DOING IS LITTER PICKING UP/DOWN THE VIEW AND TAKING BAGS OF EMPTY BEER CANS TO RECYLE BANK.
I WONDER HOW MANY RESIDENTS SEE cllr Barry Poulton DO THIS AS REGULAR AS ME ON THAMES VIEW.
Pam from Thames Ward :
Date: June 29, 2009 @ 10:55 pm
Reply to comments made by disillussioned resident :
Seems very strange that you will not put your name to your comments (as many on here have) My guess this is because under labour party members rules of remit you should not be airing your views on here. The democratic process in this selection stinksas much as the selection nite of 18th june meeting.
Hope you have read the comments on here very carfully as it clearly shows that Thames ward has only 2 hard working cllrs thus being Fred Barns and Joan Rawlinson
fed up and angry Barking party member :
Date: June 30, 2009 @ 12:23 pm
What are that lot at North Street up to now?????
I have had a letter this morning telling me they have changed the venue for the selections to a church hall in Dagenham.
Not even in the constituency now, what is their game? and they trying to make sure that good and true members dont turn up and they can then impose their people?
Because thats what it looks like to me. Never before in all my years in the party and thats 30years + have i known such a shambles.
Heaven knows what this lot is costing, because they are putting in through the Royal Mail, before ward secretaries and ward officers used to deliver the letters to save the party money.
Its as though they no longer trust us to do the job.
Well bugger them, I will see what the weather is like, but on reading their paperwork I think I already know who my ward is going to get lumbered with and it stinks.
del :
Date: June 30, 2009 @ 3:17 pm
So we all have to trot over to Dagenham then. Well can we stay there then please working for a true constituency MP Jon Cruddas who realy knows and cares about the people he serves.
Why did Barking get the short straw and end up with an MP who just wants to control not serve.
When was the last time M Hodge mention Barking in the house of commons.
When did she ever do anything practical in the borough,all of her claims are actually for works done by councillors.
Another Resident from Barking :
Date: June 30, 2009 @ 4:02 pm
The new venue is probably designed to
discourage people who live near the first venue from attending.
Typical!! another dirty trick.
Angry Resident from Thames Ward :
Date: June 30, 2009 @ 10:39 pm
new venue is :
Roman Catholic Church
Oxlow Lane
Dagenham
AT 11am
5th July 09
How many more dirty trick are going to be played before the north street trolls are stopped.
This cannot be allowed to continue Mr Brown ? you need to step in and take control of this situation before it hits the national newspapers which at this rate will not be very long!
night shift worker barking :
Date: July 1, 2009 @ 4:08 am
Now you have got around to inviting the national newspapers in good move.
They should be putting this under the spotlight this kind of abuse of decent hardworking people should not be allowed to go on.
It is a mirror on what is happening in the house and nationally and someone needs to get a grip
digusted party member and trade unionist :
Date: July 1, 2009 @ 7:36 am
Many years ago when the Labour party was formed, its foundations and rules came out of the trade union movement. And I believe a lot of those procedural rules still apply.
This gives the ordinary members like us to chance to take back our party, there are more of us than there are of them.
They are only officers of the party because we put them there, and we can remove them. A vote of No Confidence in the Chair of a Ward, or of a CLP or of the Local Government committee, or why not all 3.
The power is ours, we can and should i suggest stop this fraudelent selection process in Barking in its tracks now.
I think we would be surprised at the support we would get from other people. And as for officers from London Region, they just need to be reminded that its the grass roots members who pay their wages, and its the grass roots members who call the shots.
Angry Resident from Thames Ward :
Date: July 1, 2009 @ 9:01 am
What happend to the rules again !?
where is the 7 days notice for the change of venue. At such short notice how do the labour party expect people to do thing at the drop of hat !! They have no disregard for the grass route members whom have got to get to dagenham when they are living in wards in barking ! why dagenham ? another ploy !? This all smells very fishy !!
I think the labour party Dominic toomey and darren rockwell should go and read the rule book !!!
geoff deal :
Date: July 1, 2009 @ 10:07 am
dont normally get involved in these anonymous threads. But as this one has become rather amusing i will make an exception. dirty tricks, fishy smells, fraudulent selection the mafia angry resident -another resident – a further resident – disgusted party members – dagenham daves- del boy – close friend- sam and sammi and finally night shift worker we have it all.
Night shift worker Talk of the national papers being involved, well maybe but the ramblings of a few anonymous people on a website viewed by a tiny amount of people wont quite do it.
Rule breaking is bad but where is the proof of it. Lots of stirring going on with no proof.
Has anyone asked about the venue change-probably not. rumour and lies work better i suppose….
Angry Resident from Thames Ward :
Date: July 1, 2009 @ 12:23 pm
reply to:geoff deal :
Date: July 1, 2009 @ 10:07 am
from your remarks you probably not a thames ward resident or you would know that none of these are lies and no stirring what so ever is going. The only lies and rule breaking is by the labour party at north street.
and just for the record there is lots of proof of which you should try reading last weeks post newspaper
so get your facts right before you
leave comments
molly :
Date: July 1, 2009 @ 2:59 pm
In response to geoff deal, I dont think Tribune would be very happy to read that you believe only a “tiny amount of people” read their magazine and look at their website.
And as for you stating there is no proof, well we could ask how would you “know that” but, lets just assure you first that there is proof and plenty of it. Some of which comes from impeccable sources.
Jackie :
Date: July 1, 2009 @ 7:50 pm
I suppose we must be thankfull that the North st mafia have gone quiet and not on here preaching to us all in an abusive manner.
Could it be that they have finally come to realise that they have made a big mistake?
Could sanity and fairness finally return to the Labour Party in Barking?
I would really like to hope so, for the sakes of all of those hard working and trusted councillors who have been treated so shamefully by a small greedy and mindless group.
But I wont hold my breath.
geoff deal :
Date: July 1, 2009 @ 9:18 pm
“and just for the record there is lots of proof of which you should try reading last weeks post newspaper
so get your facts right before you
leave comments”
I stand corrected sorry, Of course the papers always print the proof i dont know why the saying “dont believe everything you read” was ever said.
Not many facts on this site just a lot of senseless ramblings.
c’mon mr brown put the recession, mp’s expense fiasco and the fight to win the next general election on the back burner and concentrate on the real issues here in barking.
Another Resident from Barking :
Date: July 1, 2009 @ 10:15 pm
To Geoff Deal
In this case the papers did get it right. They just didn’t print all the facts. They Couldn’t.
Senseless ramblings they are not. They are indeed impeccable sources from people who were there and saw the disgraceful behaviour of the Chair and his henchman. The proof is that the stories are true, and this will be proved in the end.
Or are you just trying to cloud the issue.
close friend :
Date: July 2, 2009 @ 8:23 am
Well our plans seem to be exceeding our wildest dreams.
We havnt had to read up on here for the past few days as information is now coming thick and furious out of North street.
It is amazing how an idea thought up a couple of years ago has with just stroking of their massive egos, and further info and ideas passed on over time brought the Barking labour party to what it is now.
Split, damaged and lets face it if our friends stay in charge, and they are our friends, damaged beyond repair.
just remember keep your enemies closer.
digusted party member and trade unionist :
Date: July 2, 2009 @ 1:27 pm
Can I please make a plea to the Tribune. We are all pretty sure that you understand the feelings and anger of, local party members and residents over this whole issue.
Can I ask that you allow this comments page to run on, we know that you go to print on Fridays and usually means some of the articles from the week before drop off.
But this has become such an important communication tool for us that we ask you to leave it on please.
Debbie Moore - Barking and Dagenham Sports Council / Barking Ladies FC :
Date: July 3, 2009 @ 4:31 pm
I am appalled that Cllr Barn’s has been ‘forced’ out as a Councillor!! I have never met a more dedicated and considerate Councillor. Cllr Barns has been committed to Barking and Dagenham for more years than I think he would like me to mention. To name a few New Cambell Youth club, the Sports Council and many other Committees/Clubs and the final accolade to be invested as Mayor of Barking and Dagenham.
Fred Barns has always been a credit to the Borough, he has always had time to listen and always did his best to rectify any problems raised. For example even on his holiday in Denmark, he and his wife took time out to watch Barking Ladies Football Team playing in an overseas tournament in Copenhagen, that’s dedication for you.
The members of the Labour party who voted for his de-selection should be ashamed of themselves.
Stop the Party posturing and get the people in the job that can do the job. Fred is a credit to the Borough and will be greatly missed. Re-instate him now!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
mustaq ahmed :
Date: July 3, 2009 @ 6:11 pm
At know in a hall someplace in Dagenham our peoples are about to bring shame on us all.
We came to this country to get away from the bad politics in pakistan we came here for freedom and democracy and we have had this but not any mores.
the bad peoples tonight are to be voting to get rid of mrs jean amd mrs val not to do good for all just for them selves. they are not honorable she from my ward brings great shame to us all the good womens do not want her so we will not go tonight we will not go anymore to party.
this is going to cause big problems we fear with friends in our ward of difference faiths they will be very angry these bad peoples have not listened to what people want so now they will not get votes.
i and my familys and friends are shamed. we say sorry.
disgusted member and trade unionist :
Date: July 4, 2009 @ 6:59 am
WARNING
The phone lines of Barking party members were red hot last night
It looks like those in control of this selection process have been very selective about which members they have informed about this weekend. It has been discovered that large numbers of paid up party members have not received letters and the first they knew about it was our phone calls.
Could this be because if the wards are inquorate “they can impose ” their candidates.
Come on barking members now is the time to protest.
Glennys Game former constituency secretary to the late Jo Richardson :
Date: July 4, 2009 @ 1:15 pm
I have been a member of Thames Ward for many years and I have read very carefully all the comments on the Tribune Website and the local press.
I am extremely saddened that Thames Ward is in such an appalling mess. I am not sure some of the contributors to the website are party members, but when selection meetings are held by the Labour Party for candidates you have to be a party member to have a vote on who goes forward as a Labour Party candidate for the LBBD and this is why it is essential for local people to join and have a voice as to who is chosen.
I was not aware of the bad feeling that appears to have been present during the short listing meeting. I was sadly unable to attend however I understand that there were originally 7 people who were on the short list but during the course of the meeting it was decided they only wanted to hear from 6. I do not understand why this decision was made unless there was another agenda that not all those present at the meeting were privy to. The result of that decision was that Cllr Fred Barnes was taken off the short list.
I have been a member of the Labour Party for nearly 40 years, it was a democratic party open to all and inclusive of everyone. Above all it was a fair and decent party. I doubt that anything illegal took place at the short listing meeting although I understand this is under investigation, but was it fair or morally correct to not see a person on the short list who had already won an appeal against dismissal on the grounds that he had been discriminated against because of disability. I think any right minded person would agree it is not fair.
I shall be at the meeting on the 5th of July and I urge any party members of Thames Ward who can get there to go along.
My own view for what it’s worth is that the recent shambles of a short listing meeting should be declared null and void and a fresh short listing meeting arranged so that the people who live in Thames Ward can see we place fairness and democracy above all else as a party. Do any of us really want to hand Thames Ward to any other party!
When I look back over many years so many people who lived in Thames Ward and are sadly no longer with us worked so hard to make the ward successful. We often had the highest turn out of Labour votes in the borough. How times have changed!
Glennys Game former constituency secretary to the late Jo Richardson :
Date: July 4, 2009 @ 1:22 pm
Whilst writing my last comment I have learned that the new venue for tomorrow’s meeting is not wheelchair accessible, so it seems, with great disappointment I will be excluded from attending as will any others who have mobility issues! How’s that for discrimination on the grounds of disability!!!
del :
Date: July 4, 2009 @ 4:23 pm
Well early feedback from todays (corrupt) selection interviews for Barking CLP which were held in Dagenham confirms every honest party members fears.
The list is being followed, you know the one that everybody involved in North street denies exists, well according to reliable sources the LIST is alive and well.
The blood on the floor today, was the blood of honest hardworking and trusted councillors.
And what has Barking ended up with a shower of ego trippers, who claim they want to fight the BNP, but have clamoured and engineered there way into “safe wards” with the collusion of a corrupt CLP EXEC and London Regional office
the phones have not stopped ringing here this afternoon and members are telling me they are tearing up their cards and as for getting behind the new candidates they can forget it.
Angry Resident from Thames Ward :
Date: July 4, 2009 @ 6:17 pm
R.I.P – LABOUR
Come on Mr Brown wake up and smell the coffee ! ( im sure you read this site! )
This site is filled with truth from the residents of Thames Ward …………. YOU NEED TO SACK THE LOT INCLUDING MS HODGE !!! HOW CAN WE EVER HAVE FAITH IN LABOUR AGAIN IF YOU DON’T COME FORWARD AND PUT THIS COMPLETE MESS RIGHT NOW !!!!
Most of the labour party members have ripped up their labour cards ….. Come on Mr Brown you need our votes or are you going to roll-over and let BNP win seats in Barking ( i never had you down as a FOOL LETTING ONE WOMAN & GEORGE SHAW RUN LABOUR INTO THE GROUND) .
RESTORE OUR FAITH IN LABOUR OR KISS GOOD BYE TO BARKING IN 2010 ELECTIONS – WHICH YOU CAN THANK MS HODGE & GEORGE SHAW FOR !!!
geoff deal :
Date: July 4, 2009 @ 8:13 pm
the dagenham del press read all about it corruption collusion in borough – hard working councillors left bloodied.
How the hell did the bnp ever get in with these hardworking honest and trustworthy councillors talking to the residents!
Or in fact is it the case that many of these councillors (i expect there may be 1 or 2 exceptions) have done next to nothing, full of complacency for to many years.
Gordon Brown (i’m sure you read this) i have told you before forget the recession, forget unemployment and house repossessions and the credit crunch, get down to barking and sort out our problems first
please keep a perspective angry resident obviously only one person should be smelling the coffee if you think anyone other than the 50 of us are interested in all this.
Angry Resident from Thames Ward :
Date: July 4, 2009 @ 9:40 pm
In reply to : geoff deal :
Date: July 4, 2009 @ 8:13 pm
I am keeping a perspective i pay good money to live here in barking! Why are we the residents of barking less important than any other labour party issue ( made be you should look at the larger picture unemployment and house repossessions and the credit crunch has not been helped by the labour party either ) !
How dare you imply that we should forget about the destruction that one man has caused by bringing the labour party in to disrepute by way of his lies and rule breaks!! funny how he has now gone under-ground and has not been seen on Thames View since the evening of the meeting on 18th June.
I do argree that their are a few councillors that do sweet F A …… BUT Cllr Fred Barns is NOT one of them he’s the most hard working i have ever had the pleasure working for the ward in which i live, which is one of the largest wards in Barking & Dagenham.
THIS WHOLE THING STINKS , with the comments like your leaving (geoff deal) we would be better off without labour as you seem to think the labour party should ignore the rules when it comes to barking & dagenham ……. double standards we should not allow !!!!! come on residents lets stick together as we pay their wages Not just Geoff Deal !!!!
Have your say everyone start ringing the newspapers a kick up a stink us the public have a right to know the truth about whats going on !!!!!!!
disillussioned resident :
Date: July 4, 2009 @ 10:51 pm
to angry resident and others, if you are party members, where were you om the 18th, if you think yoU was hard done by , there was not what you could call overwhelming support for any one on that night, and now you are all still bleating about it,and still have not got your facts right, but are more interested in blaming people instead of facing them .accusations false information and such will not solve anything , if anything you are just as equally bad for inflaming the situation through assumptions by people who should know better,and are interested only in their own agendas
YES IT STINKS, LIKE MOST OF THE FALSE ANTAGONIST LETTERS ON THIS SITE,no one seems willing to compromise which is a shame, so for those who dont want a peaceful and reasonable ooutcome, GOODBYE
night shift worker barking :
Date: July 5, 2009 @ 2:55 am
Well I see the North street mafia trolls have been busy posting on here last night trying to convince the majority that their miniority plan of corruption was the right thing to do. Take geoff deal forget the recession and back corruption Gordon, and disulloshioned resident tells us we should compromise I for one will never compromise with liars and cheats.
So I formally request the NEC of the Labour Party steps in removes the Exec of Barking CLP and LGC and London Region and fully investigates the lot
molly :
Date: July 5, 2009 @ 6:54 am
What a corrupt bunch this North street Mafia are, for months and months they and M Hodge have been preaching that only they can beat the BNP, that the councillors that are in place now at this minute and already beat the BNP in 2006 didnt do it right.
This corrupt bunch were going to be our saviours, now what do we find, they have engineered the deselection of these same councillors (who are recognised as holding safe labour seats) so that this same corrupt bunch can stand in safe seats and will not have to fight the BNP.
And I heard late last night that this arrogant bunch are calling these councillors that they have cheated and asking that they stand in seats that it is known will fall to the BNP.
Do not believe a word this lot says and I am today tearing up my membership card and will go openly to the press both local and national.
I wont be bringing disgrace on my party because they have already done it.
Lizzy :
Date: July 5, 2009 @ 7:22 am
I add my call to Night Shift worker.
I too formally request that the NEC of the Labour Party steps in to remove the Exec of Barking CLP, the LGC and London Region and holds a full open and transparent investigation into the corruption in the Barking selection process.
geoff deal :
Date: July 5, 2009 @ 8:48 am
why is it that anything said on here that gives a different perspective is from this north street mafia.
Never yet seen a situation that does not have 2 sides to it.
Read it properly night shift worker. Your statement “Take geoff deal forget the recession and back corruption Gordon.”
It’s not what i said, i think you need to get some sleep, then wake up and smell the coffee.
Dont turn a reasoned statement into something it isnt.
I agree with angry resident Fred is possibly not one of those councillors who does sweet fa. Just because he has a problem on thames ward dosent mean the whole thing stinks, keep your perspective.
As for Molly i will keenly look for your name in the press.
Theres a reason why we are the only council with 12 bnp councillors in opposition and it aint this process
Sue (Thames Ward Resident) :
Date: July 5, 2009 @ 11:25 am
I have read the comments on this page and read articles in the Dagenham post and even though I wasnt going to write I felt compelled to today because of earlier comments made suggesting that you had to be a party member to comment (disalussioned resident 10.51pm).
Sorry but I thought it was not just party members who got to vote for their local councillor but everyone. We “normal” folk rely on the local party to do right by us and put up the best candidates forward for the ward not using personal vendettas or guidence from MPs to side step exsisting hard working proven councillors like Fred Barns.
I for one dont trust the labour party BUT would of voted for them if Fred had been the candidate but as he isnt labour will definately not get my vote. I dont want to be a party member but I do have a say who my local Councillor will be and my MP for that matter so roll on the next elections I think Labour might not have such “safe seats” in Barking. People do use their own minds and want to vote for people they know and trust.
Pam D Thames View resident :
Date: July 5, 2009 @ 11:35 am
I am totally disgusted at the way Fred Barnes has been treated. I have known him personally for many years and he has always been above board and worked hard, particularly for the youth of the borough and has achieved much for them. On Thames View it was thanks to him that we had play areas created where there were none. He listened to the youth.
You can talk to Fred any time of the day and if he’s not there his wife is always happy to take a message for him and he ALWAYS gets back to you. Who have they in mind to possibly replace him with; who absolutely knows the people; knows their fears and worries and can talk to them as a friend as well as a councillor.
When I read about the de-selections they were all hardworking councillors, so why were they picked? Did they all have their own minds about things – heavens forbid! Our council is becoming more and more corrupt and needs to be examined minutely.
There is no “new blood” that could possibly take the place of Fred and work as hard as he does. Definitely dirty tricks are afoot and I dread to think what they are – although I have a good idea. Things can only get worse just when we felt we’d reached rock bottom in this borough.
Sammi Gascoigne campaign for Val Group :
Date: July 5, 2009 @ 12:01 pm
I have read with interest the posts over the last few days. It certainly looks to me as though this geoff deal is right up himself, coming out with there are always two sides to a reasoned argument, yes your right there is, but as yet you have not put up a reasoned argument.
Why have the North street mafia chosen to deselect good hard working councillors that have a track record of taking on the BNP and winning.
What track record have those who have lied and cheated to take their seats got none, none whatsoever.
So I too formally call on the NEC of the Labour party remove the Exec of Barking CLP and LGC and the London Regional officer involved and carry out a full open and transparent investigation.
How about that for a reasoned argument g.deal
disgusted barking resident :
Date: July 5, 2009 @ 4:33 pm
G Shaw and the North street mafia, should this afternoon be hanging their heads with shame, but no, they are so arrogant and so puffed up with their own importance they are not giving any thought at all to the residents they claim to want to represent.
If they did really care and really want to listen then explain why today a severely disabled member from Thames ward struggled over to Dagenham to attend the ward selection meeting, struggled up the stairs, because there was no access for the disabled only to find she was the only Thames ward member to turn up.
G Shaw and his cronies had obviously taken the decision that they had won by taking Fred out, so why bother to turn up, but they didnt bother to tell this poor woman.
And this lot expect us to vote for them….never
I will join the call for the NEC to come in and wipe the arrogant smile off all their faces.
Shame on you all.
Glennys Game former constituency secretary to the late Jo Richardson :
Date: July 5, 2009 @ 8:01 pm
Just to let you know that I did manage with tremendous difficulty and considerable pain to attend the selection meeting for Thames Ward today. I only managed this with the help of 2 attendees at the meeting and my husband who is my carer.
I was the only member of Thames Ward who did attend. The meeting was therefore as directed in the rules of the Labour Party, made up of executive members of the Labour Party. The procedures of the meeting were carried out correctly. Dominic Twomey, Lynda Rice and Chris Rice did not attend as they have already been selected by other wards.
Cameron Geddes, Barry Poulten and Jose Channer spoke to the meeting and answered questions. After they had left the meeting I requested that a record be made that in my opinion the recent short listing meeting had been wholly unfair in how it had been conducted in the selection of Cllr Fred Barnes.
A vote was then taken on the 3 prospective candidates before us today. They were all unanimously accepted as Thames Ward Labour Party candidates for the local elections next year.
I remain desperately saddened about the unfairness and injustice metered out to Cllr Fred Barnes. It was discourteous and totally unnecessary not to allow him to remain on the short list.
I want to say thank you to disgusted barking resident for your support in understanding and recording just how difficult it was for me to attend given that I have a very debilitating disability.
disillussioned resident :
Date: July 5, 2009 @ 9:45 pm
all huff and no puff, where was the posters and the demostration, or do you prefer jeremy kyle, just as I expected , gutless hiding behind words but no bottle to face people face to face,not very credible is it to your argument.nice and honest letterfrom glennys, and geoff deal who seem to see the real picture and not the troublesome ramblings of certain people full of hatred, I FOR ONE WONT CRY FOR THEM, AS THEY DONT WAnt to really see reason, and wont work for the better good of the borough. lets face it ,some of the so cALLED EXCELLENT CLLRS , through their own complacency and ignorance and inaction where responsible for the BNP getting in , in the first place and as for dirty tricks ,they have just been as guilty over the last few years as anyone else, they have not been whiter than white, so dont kid yourselves, a lot goes on behind the scenes that we dont know about and can only surmise on what happens and results in various communitiesa,good luck to old and new there is only one enemy the BNP
geoff deal :
Date: July 5, 2009 @ 9:45 pm
reply to Sammi Gascoigne campaign for Val Group :
Date: July 5, 2009 @ 12:01 pm
“Why have the North street mafia chosen to deselect good hard working councillors that have a track record of taking on the BNP and winning.”
Where have deselected councillors taken on the bnp and won? Certainly not on the door step where it matters.
if you consider your loose batch of random moans to be a reasoned response to my post then there is no point in going on
Good luck sammi, you will certainly need it
Resident from Thames Ward :
Date: July 5, 2009 @ 10:34 pm
Reply to :disillussioned resident :
Date: July 5, 2009 @ 9:45 pm , geoff deal :
Date: July 5, 2009 @ 9:45 pm
Today’s meeting was cut & dry!
The fight will go on the right way in the press many have already put their names forward in the press over the past weeks/months and this will continue for many months to come.
Our focus today was not to attend a wash-out of a selection panel, But to plan our important next move and yes the force behind the de-selected councillors was beavering away with facts to take this to the next level. So you obviously was not aware the meeting today.
This is NO loose batch of random moans. Watch this shambles the labour party have created be sorted.
& fancy that the Labour party bringing Ms Hodge into further question allowing the party to arrnage a meeting with no disabled access ………….. given she was once the minister for disablility rights!!
The plot for labours dirty tricks get deeper by the day!
disillussioned resident :
Date: July 6, 2009 @ 12:19 am
oH I forgot thatthames ward resident
has all the facts, or only one side of them, look closer to homr for the real reason the venue was changed at the last minute, but then again you only want to believe what you want to without asking other people from any side to get true facts. no loose random moans you say,this lost the plot over a hundred comments ago, never take what you hear or told as gospel. you certainly have not checked out both sides of the conflict, how about dirty tricks by cllrs,maybe their actions need to be brought into the equasion, its time to stop the damage now,no one is going to benifit from this continious war in the party except the BNP,and it will be just as much your fault as anyone elses build bridges dont burn them,as some people are trying to do,otherwise everyone will suffer in the long run
and for what, sheer bloodied mindness
you will be pleased to hear that this is the last time that i can be bothered to comment I suppose i will get the usual replies, but that just shows how people dont want a peaceful or reasonable outcome,I feel sorry for them and hope they can come to their senses soon
night shift worker barking :
Date: July 6, 2009 @ 3:02 am
Well thank goodness for that then, the trolls will not be reading or posting on here any more.
They do so love to try and slander councillors with hints and innuendos don’t they they do not have the very great bank of evidence that councillors and members have on them not only as a group but as individuals.
Just bideing our time it will come out when you least expect or want it to
Come on NEC save Labour in Barking because at the moment its being directed by infiltrators from BNP
insomniac of Barking :
Date: July 6, 2009 @ 4:30 am
It was suggested by a friend of mine that as I have insomnia I may like to read this site as an alternative medicine. IT SEEMS THAT THE FEU BETWEEN cLLR
insomniac of Barking :
Date: July 6, 2009 @ 4:58 am
sorry about that I fell asleep for a short while. now where was I. oH yes, it seems that the feud between Cllr Barnes and G Shaw has been going on for some time, probably years who knows, could it not have been resolved then, instead of letting it fester until now.Perhaps someone could enlighten me and others on this as there must be someone out there who knows all the true facts. I am sure that most Councillors do an excellent job for their respective wards, but equally there may be some that do not. Is the general concensus that the new prospective Councillors will not do a good job, or will people not give them a chance because they have replaced people that were respected by the community and did the job they were elected to do. These prospective Councillors should be given the chance to prove themselves against the tough opposition they will encounter (not only the BNP but people from their own party). If they do not come up to the mark then the deselected Councillors have every right to say “I told you so”, but please give them a chance to prove themselves and if possible give them support in what must be a daunting time for them, especially the first time candidates. Just one more thing before I go to sleep I did not realise we had trolls in the borough, are they on the electoral role.
mustaq ahmed :
Date: July 6, 2009 @ 7:32 am
great shame we feels today we are not muslem peoples who want to interfere we enjoyed the friendship and the works that our councillors did.
but now we have 3 muslems in abbey ward and 2 muslem and how you says 1 tokens white man in gascoigne who we are told does not live in barking.
what will happens to the muslem womens who live with violent and cruel husbands who will help them now. what will happen to the young muslem girls who will be sent back to pakistan or other countrys for forced marriages who will helps them now.
these women and girls will no longer feel safe in going for help from councillors we now in the past the good works that was done to protect and help these peoples this will all be gone.
and the white peoples in these wards who will they vote for, we do not interfear we live sides by sides we do not take over this is all wrong manys will suffer
there is great shame in moderate muslems for this evil today
Well Wisher :
Date: July 6, 2009 @ 7:56 am
Good luck to all the appointed candidates, they have made it through a diffcult process which some standing councillors were unable to (for whatever reason which has clearly been debated enough). I hope that the appointed candidates remain to stay committed to the cause for working for the people of Barking and Dagenham and are successful in keeping the BNP out come 2010. They have shown through the villisation of forums such as this and local press that they are indeed strong, and committed and hope that they keep these virtues up alongside the hard work that is required of them. They will be faced with furthur battles along the way from those who feel hard done by and have lost their focus but I am sure that the new candidates will be able to work as a party to support one another and the residents in our real fight against the BNP.
Don’t ponder on the negative posts that are on here where many people do not know who you are and only speculate as to why you have taken this diffcult post on – get to know those that live in your wards and start to fight their batteles now as they are the true people that matter.
Good Luck
Message for : well wisher :
Date: July 6, 2009 @ 8:47 am
These new councillors never got selected fairly, They was cherry picked by the north street trolls and placed in the selection at the reputation of the labour party by any which way it could be done!
It’s the resident of the wards that have lost good hardworking councillors that have hard to come in putting this mess right through the proper chanels.
WE ALL KNOW THAT IF THIS IS NOT PUT RIGHT SOON ~~~~~ BNP WILL WIN SEATS IN 2010 AND ALL I CAN SAY IS GOOD LUCK TO THEM!, AS MS HODGE HAS HANDED IT TO THEM ON A PLATE SHE MAY ASWELL RETIRE AS DE-SELECTING JOAN, VAL , FRED AND MANY MORE HAS MARKED THE END FOR LABOUR IN BARKING & DAGENHAM
resident :
Date: July 6, 2009 @ 8:55 am
***GOD HELP US ALL***
**WHAT A SHAMBLES LABOUR HAVE CREATED FOR BARKING**
********SACK THEM ALL********
disgusted barking resident :
Date: July 6, 2009 @ 9:17 am
Message for well wisher
Please get back under the bridge with all the other trolls.
Another message for well wisher :
Date: July 6, 2009 @ 11:33 am
You clearly think things are done correctly in this borough if you think these candidates were selected democratically.
This council is as democratic as our government and the candidates will be shown to reflect the nature of our borough and be in their positions for one reason only and that is not to support us residents of long standing.
Well Wisher :
Date: July 6, 2009 @ 11:39 am
Disgusted Barking Resident and the person that left a message for myself, – I wanted to thank you for your comments that go to show how uneducated you really are and hope these enlighten people who are reading messgaes on this site as to your lack of understanding about what has been happening.
Just like I had some well meaning advice for the Labour candidates I also have some for you …. I have heard that the BNP are still looking for people to stand apparently their only requirment is that candidates are half-wits that are good are spreading rumours, gossip and failing that just able to shout out insults – its seems as though you and some others on this site may be in with a good chance. Good Luck!
Support the trolls campaign :
Date: July 6, 2009 @ 11:54 am
In reply to Digusted Barking Resident, should that not read Digusted arking Mad Resident???. This is discrimination against trolls, they have the freedom of speech and rights as well. If you care to look up the meaning of the word “troll”, as well as being a giant or dwarf it can also mean a fabulus person and I think that all the selected pospective candidates are trolls, but in the nicest sense of the word. People like yourself who are making nasty remarks about people they do not know are doing more harm than good and will not win the respect of anyone apart from your own mindless group.
Respect has to be earned and as yet you have not earned any.
LONG LIVE THE TROLLS
disgusted barking resident :
Date: July 6, 2009 @ 12:01 pm
OH dear well wisher you really do have to get down in the gutter dont you.
Once again the abusive comments about the residents who have posted on here, just goes to show how the local labour party are listening, NOT, and as for your suggestion that the BNP are looking for people to stand, well you only have to look at what the North street mafia have put up, seems to me the BNP win from both sides of the floor.
As we have already been told by persons posting on this site the BNP infiltrated North street months and months ago. And many of us know who as well.
So thanks for your Good luck wishes, justice will out in the end.
Well Wisher :
Date: July 6, 2009 @ 1:17 pm
I think you really should take the time to re-read comments made today before you start making accusations about who is in the gutter… your comments have a lot to be desired for. My comments were aimed at those who today had made ref themselves to supporting the BNP and could only come up with insults aimed at me – a resident supporting the boroughs candidates in their fight against the BNP.
However I am really intrested as to whom you are speculating is a BNP spy at North Street? I think everybody has the right to know what other gosspip is going round. Lets hope your brave enough to name and shame them…
Dave H :
Date: July 6, 2009 @ 1:58 pm
Liebour cant even run a selection committee without bending rules and falling out LOL.
Never mind sell some gongs , start a couple of illegal wars , bang some expenses in , sell the working class down the drain . It’s what your leaders do , proud working class voting BNP
Alexander :
Date: July 6, 2009 @ 5:26 pm
Val Rush was no decent councillor! Sorry to be frank but in the 15 years I lived in her ward I never received a letter, see her in person, receive any updates about the work she was doing and the time I did meet her in person I was presented with nothing more than rudeness and hostility. So whoever was her communications coordinator/ PR agent, Sammi needs to be sacked!
As for everyone name calling, bitching, making threats that they won’t vote and so on I wish you would talk with your feet because with regards to selections, campaigns and the general Labour movement in Barking, support and voluntary help is limited to the few.
As it stands the Labour Party consists of several individuals and many fractured factions across Barking and Dagenham. If that is the approach people wish to take forward then there is a far greater problem for this Party and the Council than I first imagined.
Sammi Gascoigne campaign for Val Group :
Date: July 6, 2009 @ 7:40 pm
Dear Mr who ever you say you are, and believe me when I say that we can read through your posting and make a pretty accurate guess as to who you are.
Your very nasty and abusive comments about Councillor Val Rush are of course a piece of total fiction which we the real residents of the ward can testify to.
So are we going to rise to your stupidity and nastiness at this time NO, but just wait until next May you will have your answer then, we the true residents of the ward will give you our answer, and your name and the names of your cronies will get no where near the winning post.
close friend :
Date: July 6, 2009 @ 8:05 pm
Been away for a few days, but it looks like I have come back just in time.
Our friends at North Street are going of message now and thats stupid.!!!!
We have won, although some of you may not realise it, our friends on the inside will.
These personal attacks will just make people think that these councillors were right, and that it is an organised plan.
We have won.
keep your enemies closer
high rise living :
Date: July 7, 2009 @ 7:17 am
Well what has got the North street Mafia rattled??
You would think that following last weekend which should have seen the culmination of their corrupt plot they would be basking in the glow.
But no, they seem to be on the attack, more so now than before, named and personal attacks on persons who cannot defend themselves.
That dont sound to me like a gang that has won, it sounds more like a gang that has run into big trouble.
we will rock you :
Date: July 7, 2009 @ 6:03 pm
So North street mafia you are very very quiet today.
Has something rocked your world?
Jackie :
Date: July 8, 2009 @ 7:51 am
Well I hope all the good true and loyal party members and residents have read todays Dagenham Post or will go out and buy it.
Now we must demand that the NEC of the Labour Party set aside ALL of this mockery of justice that is called a selection process. And run it fair and square without any interference from North street and London Region.
And mentioning London Region we should be demanding that the General Secretary of the Labour Party sacks Ken Clark the Regional Director for London and Rob Chapman the so called East London Organiser.
Why should we be demanding that they are sacked? because they got into bed with the corrupt bunch at North Street instead of listening to the real party members.
So please join the call
Another Resident from Barking :
Date: July 8, 2009 @ 7:56 am
This supposedly serious debate on very dangerous issues within the Labour Party has degenerated into a slanging match, mores the pity.
For God’s sake stop this silly nonsense and lets get back to exposing the dirty tricks and personal vendetta that has reduced this Borough to a laughing stock.
I have never seen such a debacle as the selection process that occurred in this Borough. Someone should expose the whole sorry mess. I wish I could.
As I have stated before, politics is a dirty business and many good Councillors have been pushed aside for the gratification of a few very nasty people.
Another Resident from Barking :
Date: July 8, 2009 @ 8:02 am
Jackie
Well said. I have read the Dagenham Post this morning and would only hope that the National newspapers will pick this up and expose the whole lot of them.
Lets just hope that the elections next year will prove that certain people from Thames Ward have ruined the very party they are supposed to be dedicated to.
digusted party member and trade unionist :
Date: July 8, 2009 @ 8:29 am
I will join Jackies call today, that the NEC come in and do the job properly. I am pretty sure that if they did they would very quickly prove us all right, and they would see the corruption that has taken place.
And as for Ken Clark, never met the man but if he is the one supposed to be in charge of this then yes he deserves the sack.
our trusted government!!!? :
Date: July 8, 2009 @ 10:17 am
READ – ON , This is unbelievable, but can you imagine working for a company that has a little more than 600 employees and has the following employee statistics.
29 have been accused of spouse abuse
7 have been arrested for fraud
9 have been accused of writing bad cheque’s
17 have directly or indirectly bankrupted at least 2 businesses
3 have done time for assault
71 cannot get a credit card due to bad credit
14 have been arrested on drug-related charges
8 have been arrested for shoplifting
21 are currently defendants in lawsuits
84 have been arrested for drink driving in the last year
And collectively, this year alone, they have cost the British tax payer £92,993,748 in expenses!!!
Which organization is this ?
It’s the 635 members of the House of Commons, the same group that cranks out hundreds of new laws each year designed to keep the rest of us inline.
What a bunch of Ass-holes we have running our country – it says it all. And just to top all that they probably have the best ‘corporate’ pension scheme in the country!!
I received this via a chain letter yesterday and thought everyone should have read !!!!!
resident :
Date: July 8, 2009 @ 10:26 am
Well i am lost for words !!! At the above comment !!!
I can see now why are selection process is in such a mess !!!
mustaq ahmed :
Date: July 8, 2009 @ 11:01 am
We is so pleased that story is on front page of post. now it is out in the light and not hidden away in darkness where bad things can happen.
we are long time members of party we are pleased with our councillors we do not want to changed them. but we was over run with all new members, peoples we did not kknow wearing bourkha or niqab and speakng with different acents from midlands birmingham why these peoples voting in our borough this is wrong.
we feels shame and would suport call for peoples to clean this up.
Ex LBBD Cllr :
Date: July 8, 2009 @ 11:37 am
This is turning into a complete horror movie, with the selection process being used as a factional tool.It is apparent that the Regional Party is complicit in this at least by its inactivity.The CLP should be suspended in its present form and a thorough audit done of the membership and the selection process.This should be carried out quickly by officers from maybe the Eastern Regional Party or National officials.We need to have capable properly selected candidates in place asap.There have been serious allegations of ballot rigging here including the bussing in of people from as far away as Lancashire.These must be investigated or electoral disaster awaits us in 2010.We need to be open and honest with local people its the only way to beat the BNP.
night shift worker from Barking :
Date: July 8, 2009 @ 3:54 pm
I agree with Ex LBBD Cllr. It quite apparant that gerry mandering is alive and well in Barking (just remember what happened to Dame Shirley Porter) ballot rigging, I hear there is written evidence of this, and the fact that London Region has colluded with a very small group of members who have taken control of Barking party, and are holding it to ransom is quite plain for all to see.
The local people are clamouring for this corruption to end.
Only the NEC of the party can do this and I would ask that they step in and do it now.
Reply to our trusted government!!!? Check Snopes.com before you look like an idiot. :
Date: July 8, 2009 @ 3:58 pm
Read snopes before you post this crap. It’s been going round for years, it was tosh then and its tosh now.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/crime/congress.asp
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2006/mar/20/mpsincorruptionshocker
For a start, there are 646 MPs in the House of Commons (currently 644 due to the retirements of Martin and Gibson). Other than that, you’d have no way of verifying any of the facts – how, for instance, do you get access to the personal credit records of 71 MPs? And if you look at Google News, there is just one story since 2007 of an MP being arrested for drink driving.
Lizzy :
Date: July 8, 2009 @ 7:08 pm
Can I please join the call, or has it now become a shout? that the NEC of the Labour party step in, void the whole selection process in Barking & Dagenham that has been so totally corrupted, and start afresh.
Would they also look into this issue of so called party members, isnt it strange no odd that Barking constituency party is the only party in the whole of the country that is bucking the trend and signing up new members. Come on now, what with all there has been in the papers about expenses etc, the war in Iraq and Afganistan we in Barking are getting more new members than anywhere else in the country, and a great percentage of those we have found are muslems, could it be that they are setting aside their anger over these major issues so that their relatives have a chance to be elected to the council, even if as it has been alleged they live in Birmingham?
So I join the call for the NEC to come in, and also because London Region and the officers of Barking Clp appear to be in collusion, lets have the NEC run the whole process again.
Ex LBBD Cllr :
Date: July 9, 2009 @ 6:32 am
I have only just had a chance to peruse the Dagenham Post and its a truly catastrophic article, to lose 21 Labour Councillors out of a group of 37 is a disaster.Of the remaining 16 probably only 6 have the political ability to take leadership roles.
The Post is probably read by about 40000 people all told, if you understand that each addition is read by more than one person and it can be seen online for free.So now most of our electors have this piece of news.
Its is now clearly time for the NEC to try and bring some justice to this tawdry situation.Rampant corruption cannot be covered up.As I wrote before, we need to reconnect with our electors and rapidly.I do not want a BNP Council in LBBD and it will be thanks to Hodge and her careerist cronies if that happens.
Mary :
Date: July 9, 2009 @ 8:38 am
Can I please firstly correct a statement obviously issued by D Twomey to the Post yesterday where he states that Bert Collins will be standing in Parsloes ward, many of us are of course aware that Bert is not standing and has made quite clear that the reason he is not is because of the appalling way his friends and colleagues have been treated.
Can I now introduce some facts, the number of votes cast for all of the members who have been DUMPED
Jeanne Alexander 1376
Alok Agrawal 1268
Fred Barns 1264
Val Rush 1278
Emmanuel Obasohan 1058
Don Hemmett 1071
Jim McDermott 965
Pat Northover 944
Warren Northover 1204
Bert Collins 1050
Bob Little 1126
Joan Rawlinson 1157
Gerry Vincent 1233
Pat Twomey 1406
John Denyer 1304
You do not get these kind of high figures and believe me they are some of the highest during the 2006 elections when they were fighting the BNP just on being a labour councillor, this is being trusted by your community a lot of this is personal vote, which the North street Mafia will never have.
Lets go through their list and see just who was involved and did any work at all during those same 2006 elections…in Barking… well I can only find one name in that list and that is Hardial Singh Rai.
The likes of Cameron Geddes who did not get selected in 2006 but has decided he will stand this time only if he is on a promise of a safe seat and a good job if elected. Funnily enough one of the new candidates for gascoigne went on holiday to pakistan during those elections and rumour has it that he was prevented from returning for about 6 months.
The others well you must make your own judgement on them Im pretty sure there are enough people around who can add what they may know.
But is this what you really want a bunch of opportunists.
Not me, come on the NEC come into to Barking and clean it up please.
Ex LBBD Cllr :
Date: July 9, 2009 @ 8:59 am
Yes I was quizzical about the Bert Collins comment in the Post, so actually that makes 22 deselected or not standing.
A correction on Cameron Geddes.He decided not to stand in 2006 and has now decided to come back, he is a former deputy leader and Executive member.
Mary :
Date: July 9, 2009 @ 9:24 am
Thanks Ex LBBD Cllr for collaborating the statement made re Bert Collins, while I accept that C Geddes may well have decided not to stand in 2006, I seem to recall that was in a fit of pique because he lost his place as Dep Leader, and could see the writing on the wall as far as him ever being on the Executive again.
Word on the grapevine now is that he is on a promise not only of a safe seat, but for the highest position within the labour group.
Yes we keep coming back to this list that North street would have us believe does not exist????? well perhaps they should gag some of their cronies, because they are telling any one who will listen just who is going to get what position within the labour group…..IF and it is really a big IF now they were to secure any seats.
All I can say is if that dark day does fall in the borough, my strongest advice to friends, family and colleagues would be to sell up and move.
Ex LBBD Cllr :
Date: July 9, 2009 @ 9:35 am
Agree with most of what you say Mary, but he actually gave up Deputy Leader, to my memory.He is one of the good guys.All this garbage happening now is Hodges revenge for the 2006 criticism of her ‘80% of my constituents are thinking about voting for the BNP comments’
Liberal Vision » Blog Archive » Cockney Labour in a Right Old Barney - BNP Giraffe-ing? :
Date: July 9, 2009 @ 11:43 am
[...] Reports suggest that MP Margaret Hodge is involved in a dirty tricks campaign to influence selections. The deselected councillors are said to be “people who didn’t like Margaret,” with the Labour MP described by her own side as ” a control freak”. [...]
Another message for well wisher :
Date: July 9, 2009 @ 11:54 am
May I suggest that before Well Wisher denegrates others as being “uneducated”, they look at the grammar in their remarks, or rather lack of it and also they should know that the word “Villisation” does not exist in the English dictionary: you haved a major problem with spelling also. Please look much closer to home before calling people uneducated.
del :
Date: July 9, 2009 @ 2:22 pm
Just found this piece below in an old press article from 2007. I thought it was very relevant to what is happening now.
The anger against Hodge has led to a fierce battle within Barking Labour Party, Socialist Worker has learned. Hodge vowed to “clean up” the local party by purging it of traditional activists and replacing them with her cronies.
This resulted in an attempt to deselect Hodge from the seat by “Old Labour” forces in Barking. But she saw off that deselection bid last week. Labour Party sources say the timing of her latest comments reflect an attempt to consolidate her power base locally.
Close friend :
Date: July 9, 2009 @ 3:22 pm
Well wisher 11.54am. Join the “uneducated” don’t mock them. Talk about those who live in glass houses throwing stones. Do you not know that you have made a big mistake in writing “you haved a major problem etc.”?
del :
Date: July 9, 2009 @ 5:59 pm
Close friend@3.22pm if that is all you have to add to the discussion I really would not bother coming back.
cares about barking :
Date: July 9, 2009 @ 7:54 pm
in Response to our trusted government and one person has been up for a murder trial has well
cares about barking :
Date: July 9, 2009 @ 8:12 pm
i do not trust some of the new councilors that will stand in this borough 2010 some of then have already been dishonest come tell the truth you sh–s be honest ?????
night shift worker from Barking :
Date: July 9, 2009 @ 8:53 pm
\your comments “cares about barking” @ 7.54 and 8.12 are very interesting.
Perhaps at some time you would share your thoughts with us as the majority of people on here are open and honest, well that is not including the North street mafia of course.
Anyway the calls have gone out to the NEC and as yet not one of them has had the courage to acknowledge our call, what are they, are they just a bunch of craven cowards?
Talk about the Labour party being the listening party, they must all be stone deaf.
Still we are not going away, this fight will carry on.
Dismayed of Barking :
Date: July 9, 2009 @ 9:58 pm
ex-lbbd councillor, you may be interested in this, raises some very interesting points
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oyN1RwWfBK4
Ex LBBD Cllr :
Date: July 10, 2009 @ 6:17 am
Dear Dismayed of Barking,
We have got some strange people on this thread but now we have a surrealist !. I take it the ‘Dancing Fish’ is a metaphor for the current political situation ?, very funny !.
Jane :
Date: July 10, 2009 @ 11:59 am
I have been away for a couple of weeks and have just spent some considerable time catching up. I can’t be doing with the slanging matches that seem to be going on. It makes both sides look extremely bad. Mind you some of it needs saying but we need to be constructive don’t fall into their trap.
Like the Ex LBBD Cllr. I would like to see the CLP in Barking suspended and a complete and transparent investigation carried out by another region.
Can I also ask the question – if prospective Councillors should not be present at the selection meetings, why were D Twomey and D Rodwell playing such an active part in the process? Surely that in itself is enough to show that the process was flawed.
It could well be said by the MH Group that the ‘otherside’ should have been better organised and they may well be right! That being said when an election count is close you can usually call for a re-count. Lets do just that. Start the process afresh and lets be quick about it.
Let someone who has not been party to all the mud slinging come in and look at the whole fiasco objectively. After all is that not the basis of our roots in the Labour Party. Listen to those who may well be in the minority and seek whats fair for all.
After that I would say ‘Unity is Strength’ and to all those who have just had a moan about what they have lost but have not previously put themselves out and left it to the few to hopefully achieve what they see as right – Join the Party. You can’t hope to change it from the outside.
To all those who say they have cut up their membership cards I say the same. Its a shame that you have done this. You may well have given the MH group exactly what they want. No opposition. I know like me you are fed up and tired but please reconsider phone membership and say you have lost your card and request a new card and keep fighting.
Ex LBBD Cllr :
Date: July 10, 2009 @ 12:08 pm
Time is fast running out.There are only a couple of Wards left to select after that we will be in August when nothing happens.Thus by September we are still in a dispute situation.
Its seems there is a depressing silence from the NEC.
Like Gaitskell we must ‘Fight, Fight and Fight again to save the Party we love’
digusted party member and trade unionist :
Date: July 10, 2009 @ 2:38 pm
Jane, your words are good and true, but a lot of us are feeling very frustrated at the moment. Ex LBBD Cllr we know too well time is running out, but, everyone with any clout seems to have taken the batteries out of their hearing aids.
They are just not listening. Rumour has it that where the vacant seats are the North street mafia are quite prepared just to put up paper candidates. NEVER before has this been done by labour in Barking, but in their arrogance they no longer care.
They will now kick into the long grass any more selections and waste time, this is what happens when a handful of corrupt individuals grab control, and believe me the corruption is there, the evidence is mounting up and will be used.
One suggestion that has been made is that the link to this site is emailed to each member of the NEC, how do we find out their names and email addresses.
Also the unions who have funded Mr Chapmans post, and who have in the past funded good and true councillors.
We will continue to fight but it now needs to be targetted, and supported by all on here, and communications to be left on here, if thats ok with Tribune, who I think we need to say thank you to for bringing this out into the open.
The fight for our party is on.
del :
Date: July 10, 2009 @ 6:31 pm
Good evening all, I have taken on board the comments from ExLBBD Cllr and disgusted, and have set up the below, please follow the link and let me know if you feel it will be of any use.
Of course if you all say no then it has not cost anything just a little bit of my time, but give it a go and please do pass the link on to friends.
http://barkingstruelabourpartymembers.blogspot.com
The Fight is on.
Whistleblower :
Date: July 10, 2009 @ 10:14 pm
All these selected candidates have to be elected before they are Councillors.
One of these is a liar and a thief.
Ex LBBD Cllr :
Date: July 11, 2009 @ 6:27 am
Whistleblower would you care to elaborate ?.Del, I will look at the blogspot now
Ex LBBD Cllr :
Date: July 11, 2009 @ 7:25 am
Del only problem with it is you cannot post comment direct you have to be registered with a blog site so its difficult.I have been trying with wordpress and typepad for over 30 minutes now
we will rock you :
Date: July 11, 2009 @ 7:32 am
Whistleblower please do tell all,but, just a tip when you start writing just put ALLEGEDLY at the begining this will protect you from any legal proceedings.
Mind you I think we should run a book on the lot of them as evidence is piling up againsteach and every one, they are a sordid little bunch.
JimPage :
Date: July 11, 2009 @ 8:54 am
As a non labour antifascist who recognises that it it only Labour who can stop the BNP in 2010 this is a depressing read. Barnbrook and pals must be cracking open the champagne after reading this thread
Focus on this. In the 2008 GLA list elections, the BNP came top on 7 of the 17 Barking wards and close in another 2. They are on a roll after their Euro wins, and I understand will fight enough candidates to win in 2010- perhaps ignoring the few clearly unwinnable wards for them, but with a national campaign to fight model campaigns in their winnabel wards
For gods sake, focus on what unites and not divides you, or the BNP will win in 2010
del :
Date: July 11, 2009 @ 9:49 am
Thank you Ex Cllr LBBD, i believe you will find things are open and OK now.
to Jim Page thank you for your moderated and open comments, but, I feel that you do need to recognize and understand fully what has happened here.
All of us to the last man and woman agree with your view on the need to fight the BNP but, and this is incredibily important, we will and shall select who will fight them in an open and transparant manner, and not in the way that has been dictated by the North street Mafia, we need and want councillors who have experience of fighting them, and not a lot of wanna bes who are just after it for themselves.
There is absolutely nothing that unites the true members of Barking with the North street mafia.
South Londoner :
Date: July 11, 2009 @ 12:46 pm
A lot of vitriol against M Hodge here which may or may bot be true.
But at least she sems to be clean on the expenses front. Labour’s real Achilles Heel and the BNP’s top asset is Notting Hill resident Jon Cruddas who is one of the worst second home cheats.
He should join Harry Cohen in retirement.
Mary :
Date: July 11, 2009 @ 1:27 pm
Sorry South Londoner, before you start throwing stones in the direction of Jon Cruddas, you really should get your facts right.
Can i draw to your attention a fantastic piece of investigatory journalisim carried out by Andrew Gilligan which appeared in the Evening Standard only a couple of weeks ago and which totally disproves your statement “but at least she seems to be clean on the expenses front.” The article also shows a direct link from North Street to a very high ranking civil servant in the Fees Office.
And just to top it off just a couple of days later M Hodge was ripped to shreds by the Daily Telegraph for abusing her expenses.
So please do your research before you attempt to join in on a matter you obviously know very little about.
And to be honest if you were to ask the majority of residents in Barking who they would prefer to have as their MP J Cruddas or M Hodge they would undoubtedly choose Jon Cruddas.
Fred Barns is still our councillor !!!!!!!!!!! :
Date: July 11, 2009 @ 3:56 pm
Felt I wanted to say to everyone that even throughout all this back biting and the horrible way Margaret Hodge, George Shaw and croanies have dealt with this councillor selection process our BEST councillor Fred Barns has continued to serve us well.
Only today I have had cause to ring him at home for some advise and even though it is Saturday afternoon he was really happy to help me and my family.
So rememeber Fred is still our councillor until the next election even though the few in North Street (Hodges base) have put pay to him being able to be the labour candidate next time.
By doing that I for one will not vote Labour in the next elections as I always vote for the best candidate for my ward and as I have found that is Fred Barns.
So to coin a phrase which I have changed to keep decent Labour is up “BARKING CREEK” without a paddle.!
we will rock you :
Date: July 11, 2009 @ 8:57 pm
Rumour is flowing, it is alleged that one of the new candidates has a very expensive habit, that neither she/he can afford.
Not a very lucky person this one.
Support the trolls campaign :
Date: July 11, 2009 @ 9:44 pm
oh here we go ,more rumours,lies,allegationsetc.etc,but
still no proof from a handful of people with hatred in their hearts,most do not even know the new
candidates or even spoken to them, so how can yoiu judge what you dont know,your accusations are based on rumours and accusations from induviduals ,who are just as bad as a lynch mob,some of thosedeselected cllrs have nothing to be proud of,some have stabbed their own colleagues in the back, instead of working together.they havbe done nothing to fight thne bnp, most of thefighting as come from ground level where cllrs abandon the commmunity through their own arrogance and complacency. its a crying shame that their little click and powerbasehas now been broken up
they have omly got therselves to blame for the split,m but I dont mean every cllr, some were good maybe it is time for a CHANGE,BUT as
for any who really are not interested
then you are too blinkered and want to listen to rumours and lies and allegations, then just goes to show how sad you really are, no proof, no credibility, the trolls will win , because all because up to now you have not got the back up of your convictions, we should be working together, but mindless morons dont want that,and rather sellthe borough down the drain,please look at what you aredoing,its no good anyone,the party but most of all the mostimportaznt people the community
Confused :
Date: July 12, 2009 @ 7:50 am
In reply to “Support the Trolls Campaign” 9:44pm
Are you confirming that The Trolls of North Street have a campaign?
Is the “rumour” of vendattas and approved lists of candidates by Margaret Hodge true?
Is this a confession?
we will rock you :
Date: July 12, 2009 @ 8:35 am
Well have tried to read the posting left by: support the trolls campaign, I fully agree with the questions being asked by confused at 7.50am.
As for this troll, he/she is either drunk or illiterate, and knowing the bunch of trolls as we do my money is on illiterate.
It is stated we dont know the candidates or even spoken to them???? well that tells a story all of its own doesnt it?
Many of us know quite a few of the so called candidates, and many of us know quite a bit about them which will be published in another place for all to read, but of course we will be holding back some of the info until the election campaign really kicks off, believe me it will kill your trolls stone dead as far as the electorate is concerned.
And as for the candidates we dont know that speaks volumes against the Labour Party, if you look at the length of time served by the councillors you have dumped, plus of course their length of time as a member of the party dont you think that if these new candidates had been doing half the work you claim, or had been active in the party at all we would have known them.
You really cannot have it both ways you know, you really cannot expect us or the voters to support your candidates who have been members for just 12 months and who have their own agenda for getting elected and its certainly got nothing to do with the Labour Party Agenda.
But then again what do you trolls know about the Labour Party? it is just a convienient lable for you if the truth is told.
Support the trolls campaign :
Date: July 12, 2009 @ 1:12 pm
you know nothing, as for being illiterate, doh,you still have not produced valid argument,all hearsay and huff and puff and veiled threats, there is nothing wrong with new people in the party as you lot have gone a bit stale,I ASM NOT A MEMBER OF THE SO CALLED MAFIA,but nor a supporter of you lot of sad cases,and you have not got the support of as many residents as you like to think stop throwing your toys out of the pram and do something constructive for once, then again you arewYOU Ynot realy capable are you,only for digging dirt
and your good at that, YOU ARE REALLY A SAD BUNCH ,YOU HAVE LOST BEFORE YOU STARTED,because of your attitude and false accusations and assumptions,on innocent people,who are trying their best whether new or o0ld
you where new once, sorry fdor putting your big noses out of joint
BUT MOST PEOPLE WANT CHANGE.
we will rock you :
Date: July 12, 2009 @ 2:46 pm
OH dear “support the trolls campaign” you really are having problems stringing a sentance together arnt you. You may change your names around, but, use the same old lines, “huff and puff” etc. As for us digging for dirt, believe us when we say we have not had to dig too far.
It is all there on the surface we will just ensure that it gets to the widest of audiences.
You really could not be more wrong in claiming most people want change, but then again you probably have trouble reading what the ordinary members of the public have written on here, because your own self inflated ego will not accept that what is written is true.
cares about barking :
Date: July 12, 2009 @ 4:59 pm
COME ON MARGARET HODGE SHOW SOME GUMPTION FOR THE PEOPLE THAT PUT YOU IN THE PLACE YOU ARE NOW. THE RESIDENTS OF BARKING ASK YOU TO PLAY FAIR BECAUSE YOU MIGHT NEED US SOON
Whistleblower :
Date: July 12, 2009 @ 5:02 pm
I have heard that people are losing the impetus to carry on with the fight.
Don’t worry there are plans afoot behind the scenes. This issue will NOT go away.
It may seem like nothing is being done, but believe me it is.
Another Resident from Barking :
Date: July 12, 2009 @ 5:11 pm
Support the Trolls Campaign july 12 1.12p.m
Assumptions, false accusations, on INNOCENT people.
I don’t think so.
If everyone is a sad bunch why are they fighting for the right to speak out against corruption in the political party that is running this Borough.
Some of the new Candidates are just Yes men, who have been hand picked because they will do as they are told.
Good, caring people who have the welfare of this Borough at heart and have done for years are being cast aside because they will not conform to certain individuals who are only out for their own ends, and using personal vendettas to get them.
Scrattons Farm Resident :
Date: July 12, 2009 @ 5:25 pm
I have been reading this column since it started, and all I can say is that Joan Rawlinson has been our candidate in Thames Ward ever since I came to live here years ago. She has helped me in lots of ways.
Now I understand that we are supposed to vote for someone else, who I have never heard of and wouldn’t know if I passed them on the street. Why would I vote for them?
I have deduced that there is lots of shilly shallying going on behind the scenes.
It worries me greatly that no-one has ever introduced these new candidates to us on Scrattons Farm.
I have heard of Barry Poulton, because his name is on a poster in our shop, but who the hell are Jose Channer and Cameron Geddes. Why should I vote for someone I don’t know. We have never seen Barry Poulton on this estate, but everyone knows Joan.
It seems to me that Scrattons that Scrattons Farm will once again be the little estate at the end of the Borough that some people have never heard of.
Jackie :
Date: July 12, 2009 @ 6:35 pm
Re: Scrattons farm residents comments, I totally agree with everything you have said.
Joan is not one of those people who goes round shouting her mouth off, but, she certainly gets the job done for her people, and shame on the North Street mafia for what they are trying to do to her and Fred.
And for who, the womble Barry Poulton, who spends half his time picking up litter and the rest at 102 North street.
To our knowledge he has never spoken on behalf of the residents of Thames ward in the council chamber, the only time he does talk we are told is if the officer has made a spelling mistake or a grammatical mistake in a report.
So welcome the resident from Scrattons we are sure there will be many more of you to lead a group in support of Joan.
Just to give every friend on here a bit of news follow the link to
http://Barkingtruelabourpartymembers.blogspot.com
and catch up on the latest.
Labour old values :
Date: July 12, 2009 @ 6:57 pm
Having read over 200 hits on this blog I am blown away by the way the good hard working people of this borough are sticking up for justice and what they see is right.
They have seen with their own eyes the corruption, slease and vendettas coming from the office of Lady Margaret Hodge MP at her 102 North street constituency office and the local constituency Labour party.
I have also read with concern on several blogs that confidential information has leaked out from the CLP concerning selection interviews and how people have bean selected via the back door. Several of the blogs indicate that some of the newly selected candidates credentials are being called in question. This worries me deeply. Are police checks carried out on prospective councillors, and if not why not?
I have heard no complaints on the blogs concerning our trusted councillors who were elected in 2006. I have however heard plenty stating how they do not want to lose their existing councillors and if they do they will not be voting for Labour in the 2010 elections.
Just a thought where does our new council leader Cllr. Liam Smith or the newly elected Mayor Cllr. Charles Fairbrass stand regarding the concerns of the local people of the borough? Their silence is deafening. I urge them to please join us to bring back to the borough the old Labour values of fairness for all.
Don’t lets lose it for ever, let us stand back to back and continue to fight for justice.
more in sadness than in anger :
Date: July 12, 2009 @ 8:32 pm
I moved from Barking three years ago, but Fred Barns was my local Councillor and I cannot believe what is happenning inside Labour in Barking. From what I’ve heard there’s a lot of local anger at the way that Fred’s been treated. But who’s left in the Barking Labour Party who’ll actually lissten to what ordinary people want or think or feel?
Havering Labour Party Member :
Date: July 12, 2009 @ 9:36 pm
I am somewhat appalled at the shinangons and goings in your CLP.
Just take one look at what happened to the seats on Harold Hill at the last local election after the de-selection of several local and popular candidates. All bar one was lost to the tories and the BNP.
Whatever has happened during your selections you must re-group and re focus, unity must be the key word.
The pains of the tribulations in Havering still continue to this day.
Your task of keeping the BNP at bay was hard enough as it was and now you are staring disaster in the face due to the ongoing row over selections – the once ruling Labour Group on Havering Council were wiped out only leaving just two members remaining.
In Havering we are now faced with the impossible task of trying to rebuild our once proud party.
Learn from our history – due to our selection debacle the only winners were the tories and the BNP – is this what you want to happen in Barking?
You have no idea how lucky you are with such a large and expanding membership!
I urge you to stop playing this dispute out through the press, whatever has happened, those who continue to do this will be harming not only the local party but Barking and Dagenham’s future. The country will be ashamed of both the voters and the local politicians who would have let in the first ever BNP lead council in the country.
Please take this advice from devestated and desperate in Havering.
we will rock you :
Date: July 13, 2009 @ 2:12 am
Thanks for the message Havering but if you are who we think you are then you are one of the people who was the instigator of this conspiracy in the first place. That is until you went a bit too far and got the sack.
So Havering is welcome to you, we will fight on thanks very much and stay your own side of the border.
night nurse :
Date: July 13, 2009 @ 2:28 am
A friend suggested that Ilook at this site. .
We live in one of the wards that’s going over to Barking at the next election
Isn’t it bad enough that we are going to loose a fantastic MP Jon Cruddas and possibly end up with the self seeking M Hodge who me and my family will not vote for
Isn’t it bad enough that our one and only Labour councillor has great difficulty in stringing his sentences together, we now find out that the chair of our tra wants to be a councillor well he’s just not up to it
Sam (Thames Ward) :
Date: July 13, 2009 @ 1:35 pm
I wanted to say I have been following Del’s revelations at
http://barkingstruelabourpartymembers.blogspot.com very interesting indeed.
Perhaps The Tribune magazine would like to read it as the allegations are very daming.
Todays blog about George Shaw really outlines how badly he has treated our trusted cllr Fred Barns and how he really doesnt care about the residents of Thames Ward at all.
Message for Del please put back on the earlier entry about Margaret Hodge as I have been told that was very interesting and at present older entries seem now to be unable to view.
Everyone interested in Barkings Deselection process should take a look.
molly :
Date: July 13, 2009 @ 3:14 pm
In response to Sam (thames ward) I am sure Del will be more than pleased to try and bring the piece out of archieve for you.
Can I say though, that the postings on that site are a group effort, I am sure those of you who have read them will recognise the differing styles.
But as long as friends and interested residents are reading them we will carry on.
we will rock you :
Date: July 13, 2009 @ 8:05 pm
Hi Sam (thames ward) if you go back onto the blog, scroll down to the very first potted bio
that is the one you were asking for.
cares about barking :
Date: July 13, 2009 @ 11:43 pm
this better day by day
night shift worker barking :
Date: July 14, 2009 @ 6:27 am
Strange isn’t it that the North Street Mafia have gone deadly quiet. Could it be that they are suffering the pain of a telling off because they cocked up the selection interviews and have been instructed to re run. Could it be Dominic Twomeys less than accurate briefing to the press last week.
Obviously something is keeping them quiet.
Ex LBBD Cllr :
Date: July 14, 2009 @ 7:52 am
Twomeys briefing was a triumph of Orwellian news speak
close friend :
Date: July 14, 2009 @ 10:14 am
Well all I have to say at this moment in time is pass the mop and bucket, so that we can wipe up what is left of the Labour Party in Barking.
Our friends in North street have done us proud, who would have ever thought that they would go for the implanted idea of dumping the most popular and hard working councillors, the ones we knew we would have no hope against, but that lot at North street are so easily led, they just need their egos to be pandered to, let them think it was all their own idea, and “bobs your uncle” ha ha.
Now we find we have probably the oldest, in age that is, Militant Tendancy going in Barking, and they have a lot of support, it is difficult to tell who will come through this battle.
I know who we would like to win, but, our fear is that the more experienced and better supported sitting councillors will win through.
So we are just going to clean up from round 1, then sit back and wait for the start of round 2. PASS THE BUCKET
keep your enemies closer
Terry Wade :
Date: July 14, 2009 @ 6:51 pm
Well, the comments are still coming in thick and fast. The plot thickens it seems! But, it’s good to see that Cllr. Barns still has the backing and support from Thames Ward.
Del’s blog is very informative. The worms are crawling out of the woodwork. Give ‘em enough rope, as they say.
Pam D Thames View resident :
Date: July 14, 2009 @ 8:41 pm
It will be a very dark day for us Thames View residents if we can’t keep Fred Barnes as our councillor. He cares deeply about the area and has done so much for us all and particularly for the youth of the area.
Please don’t let him go; we don’t want or need new untried councillors. Tell us what else we can do to keep him – anyone.
night shift worker barking :
Date: July 15, 2009 @ 7:07 am
Having just read this mornings dagenham post all I can say is that John Davis has confirmed what everyone has said about him.Firstly John you Chair Barking CLP not group and only cos they need a patsy, secondly on the day you went for “interview” all sitting councillors were seen by a panel of 2 NOT 4/5 as you claim. I think that’s proof positive you didn’t get anywhere near the interview room.
we will rock you :
Date: July 15, 2009 @ 8:39 am
Having just read the Post myself I think the editor and his team are to be congratulated.
But what about that silly old buffoon John Davis, its obvious that he didnt write the letter himself, so we must presume the North street mafia had a hand in it, but then to put in the wrong information as well are they now trying to dump John Davis? has he now become a liability for them, it certainly seems to be the groundswell of opinion over there according to our source.
It has been reported to us that John even had difficulty finding the place where the interviews were held, and then to come out with 4/5 when everyone knows that sitting councillors were interviewed by 2 on that day.
But then of course John never got any where near the interview room did he?
Barking and Dagenham Labour Party in Chaos | London Patriot :
Date: July 16, 2009 @ 8:41 am
[...] The above insipid article by the Labour biased Barking and Dagenham Post seeks to down play the chaos in the local Labour party. The recent revolt and chaos stems from the interference of Margaret Hodge MP for Barking and her sock puppets Domonic Twomey and darren Rodwell who seems to have more power than the local Council Leader Liam Smith. Twomey who is not even a local councillor but the son of one is well known for his roughshod bullying style. Twomey, Hodge and the fascist searchlight organisation have joined forces to get rid of any councillors they regard as ‘trouble’. This includes some councillors who have been outspoken of the ‘loony left direction’ the party is taking. Others are objectors to the ‘Africans for Essex’ programme and the swamping of Barking and Dagenham with Africans. Disgruntled councillors have made their feelings clear in the comments section of this tribune article [...]
we will rock you :
Date: July 16, 2009 @ 11:53 am
The copy of the posting in the London Patriot could not be more wrong, even though in parts it is correct.
Firstly Searchlight is not involved in the revolt in Barking CLP, why not you could ask? answer plain and simple, M Hodge, Rodwell and Twomey will have nothing whatsoever to do with Searchlight.
The fact of the matter is that some members of Searchlight are giving their support to the Councillors who have been de-selected, the reason for this stand by Searchlight is that they know and value the work and the committment those who have been de-selected have given and will continue to give in fighting the BNP.
Unlike the North street mafia who we are told are planning to bond with the BNP.
A view from the north (Andy Toogood) :
Date: July 16, 2009 @ 3:27 pm
There are times that change is essential and there is definately a need to face the challenges that are being thrust on the party by the BNP. if this means a change in the elected council then that is the way it should be.
HERE’S TO DEMOCRACY
A view from the north :
Date: July 16, 2009 @ 3:34 pm
long live change
digusted party member and trade unionist :
Date: July 16, 2009 @ 6:47 pm
As for a view from the north, which northern part of Barking do you come from mate.
Or is it just north of the Watford Gap near Birmingham, where we understand a large number of Barking CLP members live.
Heres to democracy you say, there has been nothing democratic about this whole process as you would know if you had bothered to read the comments and the original article.
But then you are so blinkered, being from North Street.
Sam (Thames Ward) :
Date: July 16, 2009 @ 6:57 pm
I think some of todays comments might relate back to “Close Friend” July 14th.
They did mention they were going to start “round 2″ as they feared the sitting councillors had too much support.
Sorry to disappoint but our deselected sitting councillors DO have alot of support and we will win.
So keep one hand on that “bucket” you might need it as I am sure you all are feeling abit sick things are not going your and the North Street mafias way.
we will rock you :
Date: July 17, 2009 @ 7:25 am
Just to let all interested parties know it is very strongly rumoured that something medium to big could kick off at about 12 noon today.
More later with photos.
Ex LBBD Cllr :
Date: July 17, 2009 @ 11:32 am
Could you plaese elaborate on your last comments ?
we will rock you :
Date: July 17, 2009 @ 3:57 pm
There was a mass demonstration held outside of 102 North Street at 12 noon today, the roads were blocked with council refuse trucks, road sweepers, council workers from the GMB union and residents.
All were protesting against the deselection of 2 very popular and hard working councillors Fred Barns and Val Rush.
The press were well represented as well.
Protesters stated that they would not stand by and let this happen, this is just the begining of the protests that will be happening over time, until they said the labour party holds its hands up and admits its mistake.
The majority of those protesting live in the borough, and are so angry at M Hodges involvement in all of this that they have stated that in the next general election they would rather vote BNP than vote for Hodge.
Interesting times we live in.
Sue (Thames ward resident) :
Date: July 17, 2009 @ 6:12 pm
Glad we can still leave comments on here. We are still backing Cllr Fred Barns all the way. Tribune Magazine – thank you for leaving this on for extra time for us to leave comment. We would be grateful if it were on the front tribune home page again because we are now following Tribune to voice our views.
Terry Wade :
Date: July 17, 2009 @ 8:50 pm
Well done TRIBUNE for keeping this going.
You are doing a great service to the people in the Barking Constituency Labour Party area. This includes Alibon, Valence and Parsloes Wards. They have Dagenham addresses but still come under Barking for all voting purposes.Please, Ward residents, remember this when you put your votes in at the local and national elections.
Remember what they have done to some very good people – such as: Fred Barns, Val Rush, Jeanne Alexander, John Denyer, Alok Agrawal, and many more.
we will rock you :
Date: July 18, 2009 @ 6:48 am
Thank you Tribune, must say we really do appreciate your support, you are actually listening to not only the members of the labour party but most important of all you are listening to the voters.
The fight is growing in momentum, and if friends on here would also like more information and another chance to air their views as well you can do this on
http://Barkingstruelabourpartymembers.blogspot.com
the information that is being posted on this site is second to none in its accuracy, and it also allows you to post in confidence.
Support the trolls campaign :
Date: July 18, 2009 @ 12:29 pm
I would hardly call about 3 residents and half a dozen refuse vehicles and crews, one photographer and one reporter, a mass demo,50 to 70 you claim,Ithink you need to get your abacus out and learn your sums,I can also recommend a good opticion,as yor eyesights seems to be failing,thats of course if you were there or relying as usual on hearsay,you will find that the phots will prove that I am right
an interested party :
Date: July 18, 2009 @ 4:51 pm
can we see the photos now?
cares about barking :
Date: July 18, 2009 @ 6:01 pm
yes i would like to see the photos of yesterdays mass meeting please
we will rock you :
Date: July 18, 2009 @ 6:02 pm
To support the trolls campaign @12.29
see your spelling has not improved, you do like to use a lot of commas; less is more they say.
And your figures do not add up my friend, there were at least 15 residents, each of those refuse vehicles had 6 men on board. That is without the other members of the GMB and shop stewards.
So you do the math, if you can.
Support the trolls campaign :
Date: July 18, 2009 @ 10:17 pm
To we will rock you, you could not rock anyone.Were you there, I DONT THINK SO,you would like people to believe you scored a resounding victory, but no one was listening, the demo was pathetic and was over before it even started,your rants and raves are becoming very tiresome and boring its a shame that you have not got as much sympathy and backing as you like to people to believe,no matter what you claim
we will rock you :
Date: July 19, 2009 @ 7:46 am
To support the trolls campaign @10.17
Ah but we were there, that is your problem, you dont know who we are, but we know who you are.
We are not ranting and raving as you put it, just putting forward statements of fact, which is something that your little nest of vipers is clearly unable to do.
Sympathy and backing we have in bucketloads, as you will come to find out as the weeks roll on.
Just keep watching the blogs and pay special attention to the national and local press.
Support the trolls campaign :
Date: July 19, 2009 @ 11:58 am
BUT, I DO KNOW WHO YOU ARE,you believe what you want to,one thing for sure is that this is all going to far,and to personal,with innocent people getting caught up in it,and that is a disgrace on your part ,blaming everyone else and taking no responsibility yourselves,this has gone from a campaign for justice to all out personal attacks on everyone who does not agree with you,the blog site is an absolute disgrace,and the person dong it should be ashamed .it is the lowest of low,you may say it is justified,well if the deselected cllrs are in favour of and are sinking to that type of guttertrash,then everyone is better of without them,I BELIEVE IN FAIRNESS AND JUSTICE ,BUT THIS NOT THE WAY TO DO IT.
Jackie :
Date: July 19, 2009 @ 12:51 pm
The problem with you trolls, is that you dont know who is who in this.
Dont forget you started this, with your corrupt campaign of vengance, and you have the front to state on here that you believe in fairness and justice, dont make me laugh, you would not know fairness and justice if it came up and bit you.
You state that the new blogsite is an absolute disgrace, why? could it now be that the tables have been turned on you and your mafia, that people are now seeing you for what you really are? and if you think it is bad now you should wait and see just how bad it really is going to get.
The trouble with you lot is that your own arrogance has made you blind and deaf to the very real anger of the voters on the street, who will tell you to your face if you had the courage to face them that they trusted and supported their councillors, they had confidence in them. And the voters will tell you that you will NOT get their votes.
So please take off your blinkers, stop believing your own hype and recognise what you have done, you started this war, did you honestly expect people to fade of into the twilight and not fight back. Because if you did you are not only arrogant you are stupid too.
digusted party member and trade unionist :
Date: July 19, 2009 @ 2:13 pm
Brilliant response Jackie, you certainly know how to rock a troll on his heels.
But just one little interesting phrase in his post that was missed. He states that “innocent people are getting caught up in it”.
Are the trolls finally admitting that they are guilty? and that they are now going to try and use “innocent people” as a shield?
cares about barking :
Date: July 19, 2009 @ 5:55 pm
go there jackie give them a kick in the pants girl
Support the trolls campaign :
Date: July 19, 2009 @ 8:33 pm
hiding behind words again jackie,you can not accept that you have lost the plot sometime ago, its not about justice anymore, just hatred,and shows how sad and disgraceful you lot have become no one should behave like this from any side,it does not matter who wins anymore ,the real people who suffer is the community,and it wrong to ask them to take sides in this viscious so called war,which you are making worse,Ithought you cared about the community,well you have a very poor way of showing it,as for arrogance ,take alook in the mirror,
you do not scare me,Iactually pity you,keep taking the pills you might feel better soon,of course you wont like what I have said,I will listen when you come up with something constructive for a change, as at the moment you seem to be revelling in destruction and hatred.
night shift worker barking :
Date: July 20, 2009 @ 4:50 am
Why is it that whenever the trolls post on here they have to make it a personal attack on anyone who does not side with them.
Seems to me that they have so totally misjudged the community of Barking and are now having to face and give an explanation for their actions and other than personal vendetta they have no explanation to give.
angry barking resident :
Date: July 20, 2009 @ 7:44 am
Friends told me about this site some little while ago and I have only now got around to reading it all.
I can now better understand why my friends are so angry, just who or what are these trolls, who gave the North street mafia the right to come in and impose on the residents people/strangers who the mafia think will be fit councillors.
We up yours matey, having now had a closer look at the 3 you are proposing to put up in my ward, unless the sitting councillors stand as independents we will be voting for the BNP. We will not be dictated to by outsiders.
sidelinecynic :
Date: July 20, 2009 @ 11:30 am
I’m not sure what the protesters are expecting to achieve by protesting against the failure of a political party to select the people they (the protesters) wish to have as their councillors.
Labour should of course follow its own rule book for selecting candidates, but they can till do so with back room machinations, power struggles etc. going on.
Those sitting councillors who have not been re-selected by their party have the option of standing as independents, but because of the first past the post system will be seen as splitting the vote if they do.
If they do stand they will *have to* politically annihilate the official candidate to ensure they pick up all the votes (and don’t split them) that would have gone to the party that has deselected them. Meanwhile the party has to politically annihilate the independent. Hmm.
Other than that, they will have to be assured of enough personal votes (for them as an individual) to know that they can win, but what’s to stop someone saying they will support them, so that they stand and split the vote and another party wins?
It is a big problem if there is someone with the ability and genuine desire to improve things in Barking/B&D that they have to engage in the “politicking” of winning an election both within their party and by the public. It must be hard to avoid doing everything possible to win on the basis that the end justifies the means.
As to those seeking power to further their own personal ends / feather their own nests or out of addiction to power, I hope they fail abysmally.
night shift worker barking :
Date: July 21, 2009 @ 1:02 am
As for the comments left by side line while on a first read they appear to be balanced on digging a little deeper it seems to push all the usual buttons talking about splitting the vote preying on peoples loyalty to a party they have been members of for a long time
There will be no splitting of vote for those that the mafia in their corrupt ways have got rid of it will be an over whelming victory for them as trusted independent councillors
night shift worker barking :
Date: July 22, 2009 @ 3:32 am
Things seem to have slowed down on here. I do hope that is because all of you are now looking at and commenting on the new blog. It gives you all a far better idea of just what is really going on believe me try it
http;//Barkingstruelabourpartymembers.blogspot.com
It is open to all and a real eye opener.
angry barking resident :
Date: July 22, 2009 @ 7:08 am
Looks to me as though even the trolls have crawled under their bridge, have they got some idea just what is coming next?
Do they realise just what kind of a hole they have dug themeselves into?
Not only are they now facing accusations of ballot rigging, gerrymandering, bullying, intimidation there are now serious questions being asked about the financial managment of Barking party. Something of course that 102 North Street should have no control over at all, but when did law ever stop this lot.
This will all end in tears.
Jackie :
Date: July 22, 2009 @ 12:56 pm
Looks like the North Street mafia have fallen off the face of the earth. All has gone deadly quite, does it mean that because the MP gets 12 weeks paid holiday that that lot of scheming s…..s do as well? If it does then I believe I am going to demand a refund on my income tax. As it is now my money paid in income tax is being used illegally by that lot at North street to fund their political works, which is so totally against the rules.
Or is it a case, as has been so often observed, lunch and dinner on the tax payer.
Either way its about time the Commissionar had a good look at North Street
sunon :
Date: July 28, 2009 @ 11:56 am
Just joined, so hi to everyone. All I read here is moaning about Hodge and others, and isn’t it a shame that some fine councillors have been deselected, but what is anyone going to do about getting lab back in in 2010, or help to achieve that result?
Moaning doesn’t win elections, action does. So does being focused on the end result. Or has everyone given up already?
digusted party member and trade unionist :
Date: July 31, 2009 @ 5:27 pm
If you have just joined up on this, then perhaps you need to sit and read and digest everything that has been said.
As far as I am concerned, and I think you will learn an awful lot of residents in the wards that have been affected, I will only vote for Labour if they put back on the slate the Councillor that has been working for my ward very successfully for many years. Otherwise I hope that that Councillor and the others that have criminally been de-selected stand as independents.
Only then will I vote.
more in sadness than in anger :
Date: July 31, 2009 @ 11:52 pm
on July 22nd Jackie said ‘Looks like the North Street mafia have fallen off the face of the earth. All has gone deadly quite, does it mean that because the MP gets 12 weeks paid holiday that that lot of scheming s…..s do as well?’
just heard that this might be commencted to the fight to replace Derek Wyatt as Labour MP for Sittingbournme & sheepy in Kent. this vacancy was announced just 4 weeks ago by the sitting MP. and who do we find in the middle of that battle? Step forward Mike haywood Deputy Leader of the local council there
http://www.swale.gov.uk/dso/displaymore.asp?uid=126
Is it just coincidence that everything goes deadthly quiet in North Street when theres a chance for someone to become an Mp in Kent if enough schemeing can be done there as well?
Jackie :
Date: August 1, 2009 @ 9:41 am
That certainly is a turn up for the books, and could as has been suggested be the answer for a number of things.
Hodge will not like this at all as she fully expects slavish devotion from him, and if he is tied up in promoting himself he will not be able to do the job of promoting her.
Very interesting dilemma.
Support the trolls campaign :
Date: August 2, 2009 @ 12:57 pm
as usual you are talking crap
you have not got the support you
think you have,you sad moronic people who have no guts to face the people you accuse,you certaintly need urgent medical help
angry barking resident :
Date: August 2, 2009 @ 5:13 pm
Seems to me that if you touch a nerve in North Street mafia, up pops the foul mouth of a troll.
As for support, I suggest you look behind you?
arbitrator :
Date: August 24, 2009 @ 6:27 pm
HiFolks, i’m new to this site, so allow me to introduce myself. i was born in Dagenham 60 odd years ago, have been bred and lived in the borough all my life. became a labour supporter at the age of 21 when all sensible people were allowed to vote. my family have been labour activists for 5 generations. i worked with and alongside and was mentored by the likes of Len Henstock and Frank Cousins. two of the true labour party members. therefore i feel that i am suitably qualified to determine what is a ‘true’ member. i would say that 10 to 15% could possibly qualify, but what about the rest? i can, without fear of contradiction, classify these into 3 groups.1 the political hasbeens, those who served their time, did not leave an impression on the party and were asked to step aside. 2 the political wannabe’s these people have aspirations beyond their inteligence, they have been nowhere and are going nowhere. finally we have the morons these have neither aspirations or inteligence they just think that coming on a site like this and insulting people is ‘big’ the pathetic souls. so to the 10 to 15% if you want this site to work then we need party workers not ‘night workers’ so put out the rubbish and be constructive. after all you are the true labour party members aren’t you!
whistleblower :
Date: August 24, 2009 @ 7:06 pm
‘ Night worker’ is a sick person he is putting pornography and worse on the alternative site in the name of promoting labour party members. if you want to see him behind bars where he belongs i know his identity. please reply
night shift worker from Barking :
Date: August 29, 2009 @ 12:05 pm
See the North Street mafia have moved back over here then, trying for a take over are we?
As for arbitrator, the only thing genuine about you chum is the trator in the name you choose to use.
So dont go on trying to give the impression that you have been appointed to bring both sides together, because we all know the truth, you were never as you claimed invited anywhere.
As for “whistleblower” I bet thats all you are good for. It has already been proved to the satisfaction of the persons who run the BTLPM blog by the police that it was not me who posted the pornography on site.
What!!! you didnt think the police would be interested, come on mate, especially as you and your chums were it seems stupid enough to use pictures of children, of course the police are interested.
So as well as looking out for yourself perhaps you need to warn your little poisonious bunch to look out for the knock on the door.
And if you are so confident that you know my identity, bring it on mate.
there you go Ive replied.
night shift worker
we will rock you :
Date: August 29, 2009 @ 4:36 pm
They have obviously decided that they cannot win the battle of words, so the North Street mafia have descended to their normal level, the gutter.
From what I can see the Barkings True blog have put the moderator on cos the dirty bunch of shite have been posting porn on the blog.
So out of the members of the mafia, leave aside the females for the moment, mind you I wouldnt put it past them either, which couple of the sick b……ds do you reckon it is?
I know where my money is going!!!!!!
We will rock you
Jackie :
Date: August 29, 2009 @ 5:54 pm
And just when things were starting to get boring they bring back Matt Huggins from the dead.
What a useless piece of work he was, a very troubled soul.
Heaven forbid that the North Street mafia are even considering getting that madman to stand again.
Still nothing they did would surprise me.
jackie
Alan :
Date: August 29, 2009 @ 8:12 pm
Don’t even think about that. It would be the final straw.I would definately put my house on the market.
That boy caused enough grief, still that would probably endear him to the North Street mafia
Old but not past it
del :
Date: August 30, 2009 @ 8:15 am
Please don’t go putting ideas in their heads.Its really odd though how Goresbrook seems to attract problems when it comes to councillors, Terry Power paediophille, Matt Huggins disturbed and mental and now Grahame Letchford Junkie.
Barking resident :
Date: August 30, 2009 @ 6:06 pm
Makes me wonder why the mafia have started posting on here again.
They must be really worried at how popular the ‘blog’ has got.
They really have no voice at all now do they.
About time to as far as I am concerned.
Barking resident
Thames View Resident - Angry one at that ! :
Date: September 2, 2009 @ 10:09 am
I would like to let everyone know that MR GEORGE SHAW has gone under-ground “just like a womble” He has resigned from every group he was a member or chair of in Thames View but has been seen watching from outside the Thames View Infant school who was attending the last Safer Neighbourhood Police Meeting in August ( HOW BLOODY SAD IS THAT !!! ) Get a life MR SHAW go home and watch corrie like other OAP’S ……………. I can now say it’s a pleasure to attend our meetings knowing that MR SHAW won’t be there trying to change the rules to suit himself and talk a load of old TOSH too !! …………. JUST NEED TO KICK HIM OFF BARKING LABOUR PARTY AS CHAIR NOW !!!!! PS GEORGE IF YOU READ THIS YOU FORGOT TO TAKE YOUR PUPPET CLLR BARRY POULTON WITH YOU.
Barking resident :
Date: September 2, 2009 @ 1:26 pm
Havnt you heard angry Thames View Resident Cllr Barry Poulton has a new name now I hear, its, Cllr Barry (nudist camp) Poulton.
It has been recently discovered that that is where he spends his holidays. So perhaps you will be lucky and will not see so much of him on the street either. haha
Barking resident
we will rock you :
Date: September 2, 2009 @ 6:35 pm
You really should click on over to the “blog” and read Part 6 of the George Shaw story.
It gets better the more you read.
OH how the mighty have fallen
we will rock you
Sam :
Date: September 3, 2009 @ 7:03 pm
I hear from a very reliable source that all Labour Party members in Goresbrook Ward have resigned over the North Street mafia forcing them to have Graham Letchford as a candidate in the local elections.
How many more members are the Labour Party prepared to loose over the corruption by the mafia.
Sam
Alan :
Date: September 5, 2009 @ 10:09 am
Seems to me Rodwell now believes himself to be the Leader of Barking party, well it certainly came across like that the other night when he put forward his DEMANDS and telling members YOU WILL DO
We all know what happens to dictators
medusa :
Date: September 6, 2009 @ 5:12 pm
arnt they shot or hung its a pity politcal parties find it impossible to work together for the benefit of all,for without us voting there would be no politcal parties thats a thought
medusa :
Date: September 6, 2009 @ 5:42 pm
and why isnt this man graham letchford up to it seems to me he has the seniors, and the youth of this borough in mind of whatever he does lets face it none of the others have taken complaints about drug dealers of which there are many in the becontree ward seriousley but he does give him the benefit he deserves at least let him have a go night shift worker befor you put the man down
Mr Barking Labour :
Date: September 6, 2009 @ 8:02 pm
Of all the members that were there I don’t remember a Alan……. Me thinks you are making it up like your name. I must say Mr Rodwell seemed very focus with the rest of the Labour team on returning a Labour council. With or without your help! or the blog’s
we will rock you :
Date: September 7, 2009 @ 8:57 am
Medusa, I really do think you need to learn how to spell, and how to write. As for your comments about Letchford, of course he would be really interested in knowing where all the drug dealers are in his area!!!!!!
As for the very stupid comment by Mr Barking Labour, do you honestly think someone is going to put their christian name on this blog, some of us do have other names to choose from. But I must say your arrogance in using the title Mr Barking Labour places you fair and square within the North Street mafia.
medusa :
Date: September 7, 2009 @ 10:22 am
if spelling is the only thing you have a problem with good for you have you proof of a drug addict wanting to stand for election or is it just a way of you letting people know you have a grudge against Mr. Letchford ,i wonder what the truth is,
perhaps (we will rock you)you should stand for election LET US SEE WHAT IS IN YOUR CLOSET OR ,ARE YOU A SAINT I DOUBT IT VERY MUCH
we will rock you :
Date: September 7, 2009 @ 1:20 pm
Never wanted to stand myself. But for you my closet is an open door the same as it is for everyone else. I have nothing to hide.
Unlike Mr Letchford who is well known for his habit in the area. No grudge just truth.
medusa :
Date: September 7, 2009 @ 6:41 pm
hearsay is a dangerouse thing (we will rock you)read the question or are you only capable of hearing what you want to HAVE YOU GOT PROOF? if not button it as for your closet i dont like grubby places
we will rock you :
Date: September 7, 2009 @ 8:33 pm
I am not about to get into an argument with you medusa, but you asked about proof, yes and yes again.
Perhaps you should do your own investigating and find out for yourself.
medusa :
Date: September 7, 2009 @ 9:16 pm
i take it the second yes was in answer to hearsay that your closet it grubby as for argument i asked a question ,for you to react the way you have can only mean one thing that you havn’t a clue as for investigating thats what i get payed for
the gorgon :
Date: September 7, 2009 @ 9:19 pm
we will rock you,if you have proof as you say,and you are callng graham letchford a jumkie as previously stated,then lets get the police involved,and if it is proven you are wrong,he could have you nicked for slander and defamation of character
we will rock you :
Date: September 8, 2009 @ 7:38 am
You mean you are actually getting paid for doing this, interesting.
As far as I am aware and neighbours of course, the police know Letchford very well.
And obviously you dont know your law very well, as slander and defamation of character are civil matters.
medusa :
Date: September 8, 2009 @ 8:12 am
then stop slandering ,if one is caught with thier hands in the till and has paid for that crime then it is over you have paid your dues ,why keep on about it or have you nothing better to do as for the law i know it very well i think you should be reading what you have written because that is what you are doing slandering
the gorgon :
Date: September 8, 2009 @ 10:20 am
we will rock you,I thought you had proof,but by your own admission it is only heresay and gossip,you lttle stirrer,and ofcourse the police know him very well,as he actually has dealings with the snt in his capacity
as a respected community representive
we will rock you :
Date: September 8, 2009 @ 11:07 am
Well, well, attacks from the same person under different names, obviously been watching too much telly over the holidays.
Just to set the record straight, medusa has now confirmed that in his/her opinion Letchford has been caught and paid for his crime so we the community should let it go.
Sorry, not when it comes to drugs, and not when it is well known in the area that it is still continuing.
As for the gorgon, (please read your greek mythology) we stated we have proof. Yes the police do know him through the snt, but they know him far better for other reasons.
respected…….representative……please dont make us laugh.
graham letchford :
Date: September 8, 2009 @ 12:01 pm
ths is all very interesting and very pathetic,.fact I HAVE NEVER EVER BEEN PROSECUTED FOR ANY CRIME,I DO NOT TAKE DRUGS,SEE YOU IN COURT ,as for you being a part of the community,I dont think so,you can I hide behind your false names,it does not matter to me ,you can discredit me as much as you like,I will have my day,and it will be at your expense
and thats a promise
ANON :
Date: September 8, 2009 @ 2:42 pm
Well Done Graham – its about time someone stood up to these bullies. They have have attempted to slander all of the new candidates in their bid to bring down the barking labour party as they were unsuccessful in their attempts to be selected once more. May God be with you and the rest of the party in your attempt to keep the BNP out.
night shift worker from Barking :
Date: September 8, 2009 @ 2:54 pm
Where Letchford is concerned I would have thought it more appropriate to state “in your attempt to help the BNP”.
medusa :
Date: September 8, 2009 @ 4:17 pm
i have never said that mr. letchford has commited a crime ,all i have pointed out is ,that even if it were true not one person who has been calling graham letchford a junkie has any proof and even if it were true which i know for a fact it isn’t everybody deserves a second chance and we shouldn’t judge by pas deeds i am all for a radical change in the labour party as i am with the conservatives and all the other parties let us have people who actually live a life represent us not those who are gossip mongers and are only in it for themselves and night shift worker you got your area wrong
Alan resident of Goresbrook :
Date: September 8, 2009 @ 6:45 pm
Having read through the comments over the last couple of days, and then coming finally to medusa @4.17 it seems to me you are full of contradictions, one minute you are saying, that if he did it he has paid the price, then you are saying, he didnt do it its not true, and then in your final comment you are telling us everyone deserves a second chance.
And we shouldnt be judged by past deeds.
Well that dont seem to be what you are saying about the councillors that you have deselected.
You and your buddies keep on saying that others are only in it for themselves, over my many years living in this borough Ive met a few that you could describe in that way.
But I have to say that the ones you have tossed on the scrap heap are not like that at all.
medusa :
Date: September 9, 2009 @ 6:43 pm
firstly i have not deselected anybody secondly i have achieved what i set ou to do and that is rattle a few cages and thirdly i have had fun doing it as for contradiction read what you have been saying i know there have been a few good councillers and there have been many who were not so good and there still are both what i have said is give the chance and benefit to anybody who will try and make this labour party better and stop the ridicule if they are not big enough to stand themselves
Alan :
Date: September 10, 2009 @ 7:40 am
Medusa, your recent comment seems to be drifting and trailing. You do not appear to be as convinced of Letchfords innocence as you were when you first started. Have your “investigations” now informed you that we the residents were right all along?
we will rock you :
Date: September 10, 2009 @ 9:17 am
Dont know why you are even bothering entering into a conversation with medusa/the gorgon Alan.
Its quite obvious to all that they, she, he cannot hold their own in a reasoned debate as has been pointed out in earlier comments.
One minute they and Letchford himself no less are boldly stating that he has had nothing to do with drugs and the police etc, and in the next breath they are hedging their bets claiming, that if he has paid for his crime he should be allowed a second chance.
Well not with my council tax money, or my childrens education he dont.
sam :
Date: September 10, 2009 @ 1:22 pm
Quite a bit of catching up to do on here.On reading comments of medusa,the gorgon and Letchford the way they are writen heavily indicates they have been done by same person probably Letchford himself, still that’s ok gives him good practice on his spelling and grammer. You need to go over to the blog really good today.
more in sadness than in anger :
Date: September 11, 2009 @ 2:23 am
When is someone going to do something about Barking Labour Party’s leadership?
LBBD is sleepwalking towards BNP control next year because of these people who are working against the local community and their well-regarded representatives.
we will rock you :
Date: September 11, 2009 @ 9:02 am
We agree with you ‘more in sadness than in anger’. But the louder we seem to shout the deafer that lot appear to be.
There is when you look at it about a core of 30/35 persons who control everything that happens in Barking clp. Never mind the wishes of the over 400 other members, who now are totally cut off from what is happening, other than a letter telling them where the next lot of canvassing is going to be.
Over 400 people being ignored, mind you that was on the last membership report, I do wonder just how many have now resigned or just not renewed their sub because of what has happened.
whistleblower :
Date: September 11, 2009 @ 2:03 pm
Well, Well, Well, It seems that ‘night shift worker’ and ‘we will rock you’ are getting a little hot under the collar with regard to the slanderous statements they have been making. could this be that their identities have been divulged and made known to the authorities? or is it because that their comments have now been seen to be doing more damage to the cause of this site than good? one thing i do know is that it would be very prudent for the editors of this site to carefully vet the comments being made for fear of being implicated themselves. Oh,’ we will rock you’, just for your benefit i have run this comment though spell check seeing as this is your only substancial comment to date.
whistleblower :
Date: September 11, 2009 @ 2:24 pm
There were two other issues that i was not going to comment on. but reading back through the comments i have decided to. firstly i was asked to substanciate either of the two differing claims as to the amount of people present at the protest. Sadly neither is correct,there were more than the three or four indicated by one, but the other is also incorrect the actually number was estimated at a dozen, this was estimated because of the numbers of pedestrians walking past and through them made an exact count difficult. i know this is water under the bridge now but this is just for clarification for those who prefer to be told the truth. secondly, ‘ we will rock you’ is correct when he states that slander is a civil matter and not a criminal one. it is also one that lawyers are extremely eager to undertake as the prosecution levels are very high and can be very profitable to both them and their clients.
night shift worker :
Date: September 12, 2009 @ 3:47 am
Seems to me whistleblower is as always full of empty threats and hot air. So you reckon you know my identity then do you? Then I will await the solicitors letter. But while waiting I would draw your attention to the recent case of Brian Coleman where the ruling was made in favour of the blogger this is just politics my friend and Letchford and cronies better get used to it
sammi :
Date: September 12, 2009 @ 8:54 am
Having just caught up on this site, and reading the final 2 postings by whistleblower, I must admit to being more than a little confused.
Is whistleblower trying to poke Tribune into closing down the comments? could this possibly be because those who are against the North Street mafia have the upper hand when it comes to getting their voices heard?
And what on earth are you going on about a demonstration for? do you enjoying living in the past? what demonstration are you referring to?
but as always night shift worker is there with the most up to date news on those stupid enough to try and criminalize bloggers. It could end up costing the North Street mafia and their hangers on an awful lot of money if they continue down that route.
I note with some interest that other political blogs are actually picking up on the Barkings True Labour Party Members blog, and from what I am reading they are looking on it with great interest and very favourably.
night shift worker :
Date: September 14, 2009 @ 4:33 am
I hear that Eastbury Ward have finally got the candidates they wanted. Well done to them, it goes to show that the mafia can be defeated. If only other wards would now start to fight back, I’m talking about the real members of the ward who are loyal and true. You can take back your ward and the party if you stick together.
Well done Eastbury
Re: Sammi :
Date: September 19, 2009 @ 4:55 pm
Sammi (or should that be Kier)
Seriously ‘looking on it with great interest’ – it really is pathetic that you seem to think that posting a couple of links on blogsites without response a month ago constitutes getting your message to a wider audience.
sammi :
Date: September 21, 2009 @ 9:12 am
You are obviously not reading the same blogs I am
True Labour :
Date: September 26, 2009 @ 12:31 pm
Has anyone else started to question the motives of the true labour party member’s blog on Google? The language used and comments made are increasingly racist and anti BME. My friends and I are really starting to wonder if the blog is really being run by the BNP or their supporters
Saucy Jack :
Date: September 26, 2009 @ 4:15 pm
Dear Boss,
I keep on hearing the police have caught me but they wont fix me just yet. I have laughed when they look so clever and talk about being on the right track. That joke about the website gave me real fits. I am down on barkings true labour party members and I shant quit trolling them till I do get buckled. Grand work the last job was. I gave night shift worker no time to squeal. How can they catch me now. I love my work and want to start again. You will soon hear of me with my funny little games.
Signed
Catch me when you can Mr Lusk
PS They say I’m a doctor now. ha ha
Thames ward resident :
Date: September 27, 2009 @ 8:17 am
I do hope Miss Hodge is keeping up with the local press ( B&D POST ) as the de-selection is still very much live & kicking in nearly every weeks post bag.
Have labour woke and smelt the coffee yet! NO I SEE NOT!! WHY ARE LABOUR SETTING UP TO LOSE SEATS BIG TIME IN MANY WARDS ACROSS THE BOROUGH IN 2010
RESIDENTS WILL NOT VOTE LABOUR AND MANY HAVE RIPPED UP THEIR LABOUR CARDS ALREADY.
Thames View Resident - WE NEED TO REMEMBER WHY THIS BLOG STARTED :
Date: September 27, 2009 @ 8:22 am
We need to remember why the original reason’s this blog all started as MS HODGE & the NORTH STREET TROLLS STARTED A Smear Campaign against our hard working long standing councillors Cllr Barns & Cllr Rawlinson TO REMOVE THEM FROM Thames Ward , Ms Hodge is sending out letter’s to residents of Thames ward stating she is address local issues that have been raised weeks ago and addressed by cllr Barns already !!!! Trying to make it look like she is working for our ward ( what a joke ) !!
Ms Hodge also states and i quote ” if you have any local issues which you would like to discuss with my Thames Action Team please contact councillor Barry Poulton on 0208 277 2116 or barry.poulton@lbbd.gov.uk , Josephine Channer on 0790 494 5353 or Cameron Geddes on 0208 924 3592. Thames Action Team can also be reached on thameslabour@hotmail.co.uk I hope you feel all of the issues raised with me have been addressed. Please do not hesitate to get in touch with me on 0208 594 1333 if i can be of help with anything else”
I think we the residents should give them all a call to ask why the THAMES WARD LABOUR PARTY HAVE BEEN ACTING IN SUCH A UNDERHAND AND CORRUPT WAY IN PAST MONTHS AS IS CLEAR AS THE NOISE ON YOUR FACE THAT, Cllr Fred Barns & Cllr Joan Rawlinson have been hounded out and off the selection panel of the coming 2010 elections bearing in mind that is the residents right of vote (not the labour party) nor is it with the remit of the labour party to ask/expect/tell the public to contact non-elected members when we still have too dedicated hardworking members working for us till next may 2010 !!!!!!!
NO FRED! NO JOAN! …………… NO VOTE FOR LABOUR !!!! THIS WILL BE THE DEMISE OF LABOUR SEATS IN THAMES WARD!
THE RESIDENTS OF THAMES WARD WILL NOT FORGET OR FORGIVE ………………………. GOOD BYE LABOUR !
graham letchford :
Date: September 27, 2009 @ 11:30 am
thames ward resident is having a laugh,and living in fantasyland as usual,I read the b&d post as well and itS rather pathetic posts on the letters page all by the same people that write on the blog site if you follow the writing and wording.If anyone has lost its you pathetic bunch,OH I nearly forgot ,judging by the blog site,what a bunch of racicts you really are,pariahs in the community
we will rock you :
Date: September 27, 2009 @ 4:56 pm
It seems that the North Street mafia are trying to deflect the accusations of corruption, lying and cheating by trying to say that the group that run the blog are from the BNP and are racist.
OH dear just how wrong could they be, and as for Mr Graham Letchford who has openly admitted on the blog that he works with Cllr Barnbrook of the BNP because in Mr Letchfords view he is the only one who does any work.
LOL this is coming from the mouth of a labour party member who wants to stand and represent the Labour Party on the Council, well shame on you Mr Letchford and shame on the Labour Party for not striking him of of the panel and kicking him out of the party.
The true Barking Party members have woken up to what the North Street mafia are doing, and so has an awful lot of Barking residents.
You will not be able to twist and spin yourselves out of this, so do stop your stupid attempts to brand the blog as BNP, there are too many people involved with far more years service to the Labour party than you in the North Street mafia will ever have.
Saucy Jack :
Date: September 27, 2009 @ 6:41 pm
Dear old Boss has decided to talk about this grand site in an announcement on that pathetic blog. I’m glad I’ve got your attention.
Good old Jack knows a secret. A website that reveals their identity. The Boss will be revealed if I am not contacted within 24 hours.
My knife’s so nice and sharp. I am down on barkings true labour party members and I shant quit trolling them till I do get buckled.
Signed
Saucy Jack
Don’t mind me giving the trade name
PS Family histories can be so fascinating……
Talk to Jack, dear old Boss saucyjack@live.co.uk
FROM HELL :
Date: September 27, 2009 @ 6:46 pm
Oh and another thing, the Boss might want to read Cheap Jerk Trip’s comment a bit more closely. The are clearly a bunch of racists for publishing that.
Saucy Jack strikes again. Another grand job. I am down on barkings true labour party members and I shant quit trolling them till I do get buckled.
Signed
Catch me when you can Mr Lusk
PS They say I’m a doctor now. ha ha
True Labour :
Date: September 28, 2009 @ 12:54 pm
Having followed the so called True Labour Party Members Blog – I think that they are behind saucy jack. It appears when ever they can not justify something they claim to have been hacked or threatned by NSM – they really struggling now…
Saucy Jack :
Date: September 28, 2009 @ 1:24 pm
Fear not True Labour. Those dunces didn’t invent me. Talk to me if you like. saucyjack@live.co.uk I’ll even show you my leather apron if you like. ha ha
All will be revealed tonight. That is of course, unless the dear old Boss talks to me. saucyjack@live.co.uk
I AM DOWN ON BARKINGS TRUE LABOUR PARTY MEMBERS AND I SHANT QUIT TROLLING THEM TILL I DO GET BUCKLED.
Signed
Catch me when you can Mr Lusk
PS They say I’m a doctor now. ha ha
night shift worker :
Date: September 28, 2009 @ 1:43 pm
Think the person who is falsely calling themselves True Labour really needs along with his mates at North Street to try singing a different tune. You should be smart enough to know you have lost every argument you have tried against the truth coming out on here and the blog, so why don’t you just be a good little boy and run along.
Saucy Jack :
Date: September 28, 2009 @ 1:55 pm
As if those dunces invented me. And how are you dear old night shift worker? Still posting those lovely websites?
All will be revealed tonight, unless of course the Boss talks to me.
I am down on barkings true labour party members and I shant quit trolling them till I do get buckled.
Signed
Saucy Jack
Don’t mind me giving the trade name
Saucy Jack :
Date: September 28, 2009 @ 9:35 pm
Distinguished Ladies and Gentlemen,
Good old Jack has a very important announcement to make. The dear old Boss has failed to talk to me and stop writing the filthy blog. I therefore take the greatest pleasure in revealing to you the identity of the Boss.
I have been in conversation with a certain ‘keirhardierulesok@gmail.com’, author of the blog. If you have received an email from this address, then you’ll have noticed the account is in the name of a certain ‘Tommy Girling’.
Now let dear old Jack take you back 7 years, when a certain someone innocently posted on a family history website, ‘The Girling Guestbook’, in an attempt to research a family tree. Look at the post dated 2002-08-11 and MY GOSH who’s name and email address is there?
val rush: vrush@barking-dagenham.co.uk
Here’s the lovely website so you can all see for yourselves: http://resources.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~guestbook/cgi-bin/public_guestbook.cgi?gb=2811&action=view
And here’s what the dear old Boss posted: “Hi Ive just discovered the site i do have a little info to add but would welcome more; Mother Mary Elizabeth Girling born 21st April 1924 to Thomas Lionel Girling and Helena nee Johnson, Thomas birthdate 1895 married december 1922, father Thomas Henry Mother Elizabeth nee Leaver mostly lived in Stepney/Wapping area.”
Thomas Girling eh? GOTCHA, dear old Boss.
Signed
Catch me when you can Val
PS They say I’m a doctor now. ha ha
resident :
Date: September 29, 2009 @ 10:01 am
True Labour is right!
we will rock you :
Date: September 29, 2009 @ 10:46 am
And just where would you be a resident of? Another planet? Islington? Kent? or just certain right wing north street mafia addresses in barking and dagenham.
Get a life and catch up with the truth.
disgusted barking resident :
Date: September 29, 2009 @ 3:03 pm
Just how low will North Street and their friends go? Not only did they de-select our hard working and trusted councillor, now they are setting out to smear her name with their lies.
If Saucy Jack, whoever they are goes digging into peoples backgrounds for names he she or they think will fit the bill then they better come up with some more substantial proof that something that was posted over 7 years ago.
Do you honestly think that anyone who was going to run a blog, and yes I have read it and contributed to it as well, would be bloody daft enough to put anything on there that would link them to it.
I know Councillor Val Rush and she is anything but daft and stuipid.
I suggest that North Street put Saucy Jack or is it Jill to work and let them get to the bottom of what is hinted at on the blog about the criminal elements in their choice of candidates.
And stop slandering someone who will not and cannot speak for herself.
capn bloodlust :
Date: September 29, 2009 @ 4:06 pm
the identity of we will rock you,is the worst kept secret ever.
how sweet revenge will be
kudos to saucy jack,ho ho ho and a bottle of rum, give em another broadside,their ship is sinking slowly and painfully to davey jones locker
FROM HELL :
Date: September 29, 2009 @ 5:58 pm
Dear All,
King Saucy here. Let’s have a little experiment shall we? Try sending an email to keirhardierulesok@gmail.com
Wait a few minutes and what happens?
DELIVERY FAILURE!
That means the dear old Boss has closed the account – and so soon after my grand work last night? GOTCHA Val.
The Boss doesn’t seem to understand, so I’ll say it again. I AM DOWN ON BARKINGS TRUE LABOUR PARTY MEMBERS AND I SHANT QUIT TROLLING THEM TILL I DO GET BUCKLED.
I keep on hearing the police have caught me but they wont fix me just yet. I have laughed when they look so clever and talk about being on the right track. How can they catch me now. I love my work and want to start again. You will soon hear of me with my funny little games.
Signed
Saucy Jack
Don’t mind me giving the trade name
True Labour :
Date: September 29, 2009 @ 6:12 pm
disgusted barking resident @ 3.03pm = Val Rush. So obvious. Written in the same style as the blog and most of the comments on it.
Disgusted party member and trade unionist :
Date: September 30, 2009 @ 7:46 am
Strange isnt it that just a few days after Councillor Val Rush gives the bnp a real bloody nose for sucessfully bringing a case of lying against their most popular member Barnbrook from the gla and the council, and gets him suspended for lying I hear a first in London.
All of a sudden a a real nasty attack starts on here against her. and by who the same profile name that appeared on the blog and behind which was a load of filthy porn
ive sent emails to the blog along a with a lot of other members and i certainly did not use that email address. so just what is going on, i reckon the bnp and their nazis have decided this is the way to attack councillor rush.
and none of the rubbish that anyone who hides behind porn says will convince me different.
True Labour :
Date: October 13, 2009 @ 7:27 am
Word of Advice – For those of you who read and follow the blog entitled “Barking True Labour Members” please be aware that the editor is not allowing all comments through moderation. I have posted on a number of occassions and she ahs chosen not to allow my comments through. My comments are not of derogative nature or illegal but a statement of the truth of which the editor will not allow to be shown, unless of course she can come up with an argument against. if you want a true picture of what is happening in Barking Labour Party I suggest you start there and dont bother reading a one sided blog.
True Labour :
Date: October 16, 2009 @ 2:41 pm
Also just found out something rather interesting. Turns out there is some secretly recorded footage of a meeting between Mike Haywood and Val Rush: http://tinyurl.com/ygohft2
True Labour :
Date: October 17, 2009 @ 10:25 am
This is all rather amusing the other website is refusing to publish comments made by me for no good reason and this website is putting postings up which I haven’t written. I can only presume that that it is the same person trying to discredit me and wont allow open and fair debate to take place.
For the record Sept 29 and Oct 16 were not posted by me.
Get Well Soon Cllr :
Date: October 24, 2009 @ 1:34 pm
Get well soon Councillor Rush Barking True Labours Members Blog is falling apart without you.
labour friend :
Date: October 25, 2009 @ 9:49 am
Get well soon night shift worker
PS – hope you’ve got a sick note for work?
with sympathy :
Date: October 27, 2009 @ 8:38 am
it seems now that a cetain person who is now out of commission,the blog site dies a painful and well deserved death along with its imaginary crew.
what goes around comes around in the end,hows the grapes
Labour member :
Date: October 30, 2009 @ 2:34 pm
I wonder if that person will have the gall to start up again when they get better and if all their imaginary little friends will come rushing (!) back as well.
bnp watcher :
Date: November 3, 2009 @ 3:14 pm
I was trailing through some back postings on the london bnp website last night and came across an interesting piece relating to b & d it was supposed to have been copied from the Labour list site and was extolling the virtues of Darren Rodwell, reading thru the piece it seems that Darren Rodwell is the saviour of Barking Labour party, only by him and his leadership and guidance has the party been as successful as it has so far. And who ever it was who wrote this is convinced that only Darren Rodwell can lead Barking clp to victory.
It also reads, and i could be wrong on this as though the bnp in that area are very supportive of Darren Rodwell.
Like i said i could have misread this so have a look for yourselves on London Patriot.
Personally ive always thought of political parties as a team effort and not just one individual, and i think that there could perhaps be some problems if all of a sudden we start hearing that Darren Rodwell is walking on water.
Ralph Baldwin :
Date: November 4, 2009 @ 10:08 pm
To bnp watcher,
I am the person whose article was taken off of Labourlist and placed upon the BNP website. You see the BNP are worried and Mr Bailey placed the article there in an attempt to show his pals he might need some help. That is why after my comment the BNP are launching a series of Tirades against me. You can’t read and I said no such thing about any member of the Labour Party you need to take some english clesses.
I have been an activist for 27 years and I know a good campaigner when I see one, where you and your current pals on the council have yet to knock on a single door and to whom campaigning is a foreign language (I have been informed by people in your allies wards who report not having seen a single Labour Face in over five years), where did I find this out? On the doorstep where you lot should be.
When you start pulling your weight on the doorstep and I hope to see you there soon as I have travelled all the way from South Korea to help Labour defeat the BNP.
The BNP are more concerned about myself and Darren as they see him as a threat, they don’t talk about you and your cowardly allies because you are not a threat to them.
Also and as a final note, I use my name because I love and unashamed of the Labour Party and of who I am, Labourlist or anywhere else, I am unsure why you are doing and saying the very strange things you are but I suggest that you go get a life and consider a positive hobby.
Darren Rodwell is a good worker and grafts in his Ward, he is part of the solution and from what I have read on this commentry you are clearly not.
If you have an axe to grind I suggest you do so in the open with whatever party or individual has clearly upset you rather than resort to this weird kind of behaviour that serves nobody, not the Party, not the Country and certainly not yourself.
Ralph Baldwin :
Date: November 4, 2009 @ 10:13 pm
To bnp watcher,
Please read my commentry you will find a number of spelling errors, list them and we can consider this lesson one.
bnp watcher :
Date: November 5, 2009 @ 12:17 pm
Well what can one say in response to what appears to be an incohearant rant by a Ralph Baldwin following my comment the other day.
I dont know Mr Baldwin and certainly the attack dog style of his writing was totally unnecessary.
As for counting your spelling mistakes no thank you, I have far more important things to do.
Ralph baldwin :
Date: November 6, 2009 @ 12:17 pm
@ BNP watcher
Incoherent? I think you’ll find the english is fine.
I think the style was perfect for you. You criticise others from the shadows, without using your real name to maximise the confusion and disruption to the Labour Party.
I will question anyone who does such a thing in such a cowardly manner.
As for “attack” I used no foul language and made it clear with my opening statements that I welcome all Labour Councillors who work for the public.
I also defended your twisted assertion that I write about some kind of alliance between Labour Members and the BNP.
I suggest you read your own comments again and think about how they affect those you are talking about.
I travelled thousands of miles to aid and assist the Labour party and proactively seek to see to the defeat of the BNP and I will do all I can to see this occur.
You see BNP watcher unlike you, I prefer to do a little more than “watch”. and slag off other members of the Party whilst hiding your true identity in a most cowardly and weak manner.
I say to you once more, taking on the BNP is a great opportunity for any Labour member/candidate you can become part of something which will gain the full attention of the Country and share in the benefits, or you can sit back and selfishly slag off others whilst hiding and watch the BNP take Barking and Dagenham, then you may find a real reason to hide your identity.
Ralph baldwin :
Date: November 6, 2009 @ 12:39 pm
This is a message to all you disaffected and furious members. I have lost a seat too. I have been there. The agent I relied on messed up my nomination (he had cancer at the time and told nobody but had a great reason for the error).
The reasons why are not important and neither is the seat. There will always be elections and bi-elections.
But in Barking you all have a unique opportunity. You can have “I kicked out the BNP” on your political CV’s and it will stand you in good stead anywhere.
At a time a political disillusionment people are looking for Politicians to show they can go the extra mile and you would be doing yourselves a great service if you let go of your personal issues and focussed on defeating an opponent that has no conscience and is biding it’s time for the day when they gain National Power and bring bloodshed to our streets.
They are nothing compared to the Labour movement and if we all cocentrated our attentions on rebuilding the public trust and get out onto the streets the BNP could not stand before us, they just don’t have the numbers or the conviction.
If the Labour Party represents anything it is in the common stregth we share when we all place ourselves forward to be counted. By the very strength of our common endeavor we can give Barking and Dagenham the honour and dignity it deserves.
There is really everything to gain here for the long term and there is nothing to prevent past councillors wising up, canvassing or helping out to restore their positions in the future.
So please, I beg you all to stand together and focus all your energies on those who are truly ruled by hatred, and to whom cruelty is a form of enjoyment.
I am sorry if my style was on the offensive but the frustration is great when you realise your party, if united could wipe out the BNP easily with the correct strategy and have allowed petty rivalries and upsets stand in the way of that which should be uniting us.
We are the Labour Party and with each assault we make upon each other the facists laugh at us.
So I apologise to BNP watcher if I offended him/her.
We owe it to the people to protect them from the lies and potential violence that are our eternal and very real foe.
Ralph baldwin :
Date: November 6, 2009 @ 12:52 pm
Apologies for spelling and grammer as I am in work at the mo and am working as I am typing this stuff.
dagenham resident :
Date: November 6, 2009 @ 1:09 pm
Well at least Ralph Baldwin finally it a appears to have the decency to apologise to bnp watcher.
The way I read the first comment they left it was asking people to read what had been posted on a bnp site because it seemed a little confusing. The next minute watcher is verbally attacked, cant understand why that happened meself.
I agree we should be fighting the BNP but it looks to me as though Barking has been split apart and I dont think thats going to be mended by attacking everyone whose comments do not follow a certain line all the time.
Thank heavens we dont have these problems in dagenham
Ralph Baldwin :
Date: November 6, 2009 @ 3:42 pm
Barking is going to have to unsplit itself, put aside personality and focus on the most important principle of all, the people they represent.
Surely our differences are insignificant when compared to those that lie between us and the BNP?
Glad dagenham is unified.
labour member :
Date: November 7, 2009 @ 9:26 am
I must say I agree with dagenham resident and Mr Baldwin on fighting the BNP, but I disagree about the spilt. I know a small number of people have stop supporting the Barking Labour Barking, but I believe this is because of the playground rules that have been going here for years and outside agenda’s. I must say that on the ground as a whole from the GC reports over the summer to now we are more active then we have ever been.
barking member :
Date: November 7, 2009 @ 2:14 pm
This all seems to be coming from one side now, with the last few comments giving the impression that there is now no longer any split in Barking labour party and everyone is working together.
Well from what I am hearing that may not be the whole truth, although I no longer attend party meetings I still get information passed on from members who do, and it seems to them that the split is still as wide as it ever was, which is a great shame, as there always used to be room within the party for differing views on things, but, from what I am being told now differing views are no longer allowed.
If, I am told you do not follow the line laid down by the officers within Barking CLP you are out in the cold.
So I will keep paying my subs and helping where I can, but the principals of Old Labour are the ones I follow, which I hear are frowned upon now.
labour member :
Date: November 8, 2009 @ 12:30 am
“Barking member” you should come to a GC meeting and see for yourself that the principals of Old Labour are still alive and kicking within Barking CLP. You may find and possible understand that we still have debate, but now will direction.
barking united :
Date: November 8, 2009 @ 8:24 am
well said ralph,your comments are spot on.there may have beem a split,but it has made us stronger,the difference now is that we work as a TEAM AND SUPPORT EACH OTHER,and believe in what we are doing,the comradeship between us is strong and those who did not wish to be part of the team and resorted to tactics to undermine what we are trying to do,will not succeed,as for Mr Rodwell walking on water,whats wrong with having a paddle down at southend.
alaedia :
Date: November 9, 2009 @ 4:54 pm
Could you spare me a moment? buy nolvadex online http://www.stumbleupon.com/stumbler/med-brother/ buy nolvadex drug Many thanks.
How are you feeling? buy gerneric nolvadex buy generic nolvadex
buy nolvadex and clomid online Happy birthday to you!
barking member :
Date: November 10, 2009 @ 11:23 am
Strange this, but descriptions of Barking CLP being all together, team work etc, certainly dont seem to be what is being said by majority of existing party members, who no longer attend CLP meetings, and many who are resigning from the party.
Its all too confusing for me, many members will work in their wards so they are saying, but, only for those who have been rightly selected as candidates for the wards, not for those wards who have had candidates forced upon them.
Seems to me one side says one thing the other says another, but the larger membership are being left out in the cold.
Labour member :
Date: November 10, 2009 @ 4:18 pm
“Barking Member” Who are the majority of the existing party members out in the cold?….. The reason why I ask is because the CLP meetings are still well attended by most of the wards, in fact I believe only two wards were not in attendence of the last CLP meeting, and both wards are working well contacting residents within the framework laid out by the Barking CLP – As reported in the CLP meeting.
Lastly how would those ex party members, who don’t go to meetings know about the team work going on now in the party?
party member :
Date: November 11, 2009 @ 6:39 pm
There seems to be some very snappy answers being given to questions that appear to be genuine questions.
I think you are trying to convince yourselves that you have a united party, but when you really look at it what have you got 30 odd people slavishly following dictates.
You must always guard against one individual looking to be bigger that the sum of the party, at this moment the great Leader of Barking clp seems to be Darren Rodwell who it seems is credited with saving Barking from the brink of disaster.
think we can all guess where that kind of PR leads.
Labour member :
Date: November 12, 2009 @ 12:28 am
“Party Member” or is it “Barking Member” the only genuine question that needs to be asked is why did this site and the other one stop for a period of time.
As for Darren Rodwell being the great leader of Barking CLP, I understand from him and others active in the party that they’re doing a job which was long overdue and to give direction to CLP to help the party retain control of the council from the BNP and other parties.
I guess if you take the time to look you would find that more campaigning and contact with residents is happening now.
No-one I’ve spoken to believes it’s one man show, but great team work and this includes Darren Rodwell hence why he was happy to report at the GC meeting whilst I was seating there, over 2000 contacts were made in the month of October alone and thanked all members for there hard work.
Lastly the reason for the snappy answers is because from where I’m standing/helping within the party they appear to be just as genuine.
True Labour :
Date: November 12, 2009 @ 9:29 am
Labour Member we all know why this site stopped. We all know who is behind it, and who is trying their hardest to break the party apart. It’s a real shame that she claims to be Anti BNP when she puts all her efforts into helping them. She does not care who gets hurt along the way, and is just as happy to see a BNP Council be elected rather then see the Labour Party succeed with out her. I honestly think that the accident was a case of karma what goes around comes around – we don’t need to mention all the dirty lies that she has been spreading. It would seem that if karma was the case she hasn’t learnt. As for Darren Rodwell I would say that it is long overdue that someone took the party by the reins and made sure it was back I contact with the residents. Well Done Darren and all the candidates that are working hard – remember karma good things happen to good people
Labour activist :
Date: November 12, 2009 @ 12:07 pm
I have heard a rumour that Val Rush has been questioned by Police for driving under the influence of drink and/or drugs when she crashed her car into a tree and broke her leg. Can anyone out there confirm this?
Ralph Baldwin :
Date: November 13, 2009 @ 12:03 am
I think it is best if we leave rumours well alone.
As I said we must focus on defeating the BNP and on nothing else. The consequences for the lives and safety of thousands of people in this Borough rest on our Unity and Strength.
It would truly make my millenium if we along with the Unions had discussions open and all inclusive and talk about the different Wards and how we can claim them back!
We need an open meeting where we can help each other. Because if any of you are feeling lonely or isolated you count me in for a start.
This the Labour Party. Nobody is on their own.
Questionaires, leaflets voter ID and helping helping people, that’s all it takes.
You knock on the doors and get seen again and again until you become “part of the furniture” and the main location where people go when they need help.
Then the “X” in the box is a given.
So instead of bleating on and personal nonesense, let’s talk strategy, lets talk about winning.
A really p........d off member :
Date: November 15, 2009 @ 11:56 am
Who the f…..hell is this Richard Baldwin?????
When did he get put in charge of campaigning, and patronizing members who have probably been doing this for years. But of course that lot in north street dont believe it do they, only their way is the right way, well after 40 years membership ive decided my way is better.
Im not a nodding dog, and i dont believe this Baldwin person really exists. I dont like what has been done in Barking in the name of the Labour Party, its not the party ive grown up in, so today i have written a letter to the General Secretary and Gordon Brown ive enclosed the bits of my membership card, but more importantly ive told them what a nasty nest of vipers there is now in Barking.
Ralph Baldwin :
Date: November 15, 2009 @ 6:30 pm
@A really p……..d off member
Thank you for your kind, warm and heatfelt words. Meanwhile Nick Griffin has decided to stand in Barking, he has clearly changed his mind and withdrawn from Thurrock.
That is fine as I am here too Mr Griffin.
Bring it on!
Labour member :
Date: November 15, 2009 @ 9:16 pm
“To p……d off member”
I gather from your comments you won’t be fighting the BNP then.
I would ask that you really think about what your saying/writing and ponder on why the BNP got in, in 2006 and why griffin thinks he has a chance in Barking and the heart of Dagenham in 2010.
A really p........d off member :
Date: November 16, 2009 @ 7:34 pm
As this Ralph Baldwin fella dont even exist as far as I am concerned will ignore his comments, cos of course he knows what has being going on in Barking, him being in South Korea all that time.
As for me not fighting the BNP dont jump to conclusions, there are more ways to fight them than by being under the direction of North Street, as far as I and believe it or not a lot of other members and ex members feel really p……d off at the way you are treating our party.
We will fight the BNP but not with a lot of bloody backstabbers.
Ralph Baldwin :
Date: November 17, 2009 @ 8:36 am
@A really stupid member,
If I don’t exist how can I be in South Korea?
I guess ignoring me is typical for you as it seems to be what you have been doing with the electorate, thus allowing the BNP to get elected in the first place.
You are a failure. You have failed democracy, failed to represent those who needed you, failed the Labour Party and worse still, you have ultimately failed yourself.
I have not backstabbed you and you have already written me off. You have insulted me and attempted to dimiss me as an incorporeal entity.
But then I guess that is why you spend your days slagging people off from a safe distance without even using your real name.
Sorry who doesn’t exist?
Ralph Baldwin :
Date: November 17, 2009 @ 8:58 am
One more thing. You don’t win elections in the Council Chamber.
Most people on the street are aware of what is happening in their local neighbourhoods, aware what is happening Nationally as it is on the TV and in the papers. But generally speaking most people do not clue into minutes and meetings as they have a life.
When I was a Councillor in Norfolk we never had the luxory of a safe seat, we had to canvass damn hard, any Labour Councillors who became locked into the job (some of them were damn good Councillors) but not interested in campaigning on the doorstep soon lost their seats.
It was with bitter experience we realised how hard we would have to work. There is no getting away from it, Barking and Dagenham are no longer safe seats and you have to adjust.
A far happier ex member :
Date: November 17, 2009 @ 7:51 pm
You could ignore what I am going to say or read its up to you, why am I far happier? because in the ward I live in quite a few of us have resigned from the party in disgust at the corrupt and underhanded manner that the selections were done.
But that doesnt mean we have left Labour in spirit, just the Barking CLP as we no longer feel that the group of people that have a strangle hold on the CLP represent the true ethos of the Labour Party.
We will fight the BNP but not for that corrupt little crowd.
And by the way Mr Baldwin or whoever you are, ex councillor or stood for council in Norfolk did you? funny that there appears to be some difference in the lists then as there was a
Roy Baldwin, and a Ralph Little
now just which one were you, or is it just a clerical error.
Ralph Baldwin :
Date: November 17, 2009 @ 9:57 pm
@ A far more foolish than I could have ever imagined ex-member.
I served on the council some time ago, before my stint of five years in the armed forces serving my country yet again.
I shall do even better, Robin.Goreham@breckland.gov.uk
is a very close friend and fellow Councillor and can confirm my role as Branch secretary, Councillor, 27 years of activism and campaigning all over the UK which began as a wee lad in the Miners Strike and in supporting my father, a Manchester City Labour Councillor, and Union man, my role as a delegate in the East Region at Southend some years ago. He can also tell you how I lost a safe seat when I depended on an agent who failed in sorting out my nominations in a seat, as it turned out, said agent had cancer and quite rightly, more important things on his mind, he died the following summer and he was a damn good friend, a Union man and one of the greatest campaigners I have ever had the honour to work with, not to mention an even minded, caring socialist who will always command my complete respect. It happens though.
Life goes on. So don’t talk to me about your pathetic deselection.
You may also speak to TFish@thurrock.gov.uk who can attest to my insistence on transparency and honesty during the PPC selection process. I am not worried about the selection now as Nick Griffin has fled the scene.
There you have it.
I have been open and truthful.
Your turn, who are you?
Let’s see your commitment to transparency and honesty?
Ralph Baldwin :
Date: November 17, 2009 @ 10:07 pm
You see ex-member you are a vainglorious failure. You are obsessed with your deselection to the point of obsession. Has someone stolen the Crown Jewels from you?
To be so obsessive over a political seat which is granted to you by virtue of the Labour Party and then the electorate is unrealistic and undemocratic.
You clearly entered politics to satisfy yourself with absolutely no regard for others at all. The seat seems to have been your mainstay.
I got over the loss of my seat as it was not the be-all and end-all of my life. There is a heck of a lot more to life. But to you and your colleagues I think your seats were a bit more than that.
For me I don’t care whether I am selected in Thurrock or lose. The Labour party is a collective and will choose the best candidate, and the members will choose freely.
That by the way is what we are defending when we challenge the BNP. Democracy and free choice.
If I get the boot, so what, they will have picked someone they feel more comfortable with and akin to their beliefs.
The Labour Party is greater than the one individual. So get over yourself. Many others have to and they don’t waste their time bitterly attacking those who want to have a turn, you had yours.
barking united :
Date: November 17, 2009 @ 11:04 pm
It did not take long for the whiners to started up again,blaming everyone else,and not taking any responsability thereselves.Some of them have been abusing and lying to the communities for a long time,now they think they are hard done by,well tough,your gravy train is over,get used to it,since when have you lot treated anyone fairly or with respect.At least people like ralph speaks the truth,and yes he does exist,and if you were doing your job properly,since some of you are still taking the wage, you would know this.so do the job your still paid for and elected to do,instead of attacking those that are trying there best
Ralph Baldwin :
Date: November 18, 2009 @ 8:49 am
@Barking United.
Many thanks.
Unforunately one of the reasons my history is difficult to follow is quite simple. From 2002-2007 I served in her Majesty’s armed forces.
If anyone thought for even a second that they would be able to dig some dirt on me I am afraid they were and are deeply mistaken.
Did anyone actually think I would leave myself so vulnarable when dealing with BNP?
I put myself forward for a Parliamentary Hustings to avoid National Media exposure I don’t think an ex-Barking candidate seeking dirt who clearly has a political agenda to harm the Labour Party is going to succeed.
But then even if people do look into my history it is fine. Though by no means a Saint I have been CRB cleared to teach, counter-terroist checked (when I served) and had an exemplary record of service.
@crap ex-member soon to be independent candidate, your only agenda is to punish those who have taken the money away from you. You believe yourself to be great because you are a Councillor. By virtue of the fact you are attempting to divide Labour support and the Labour Vote you are aiding the BNP for your own petty and very selfish agenda.
Everything you hope to accomplish is self-serving and ultimately destructive. I really hope you stand as an Independent. Then you will know me all too well.
Terry Wade (Former Deputy Leader of B & D Council). :
Date: November 18, 2009 @ 9:20 am
Just in case anybody is linking me with previous anonymous comments, let me make it clear that I only make comment using my name. I don’t hide behind anonimity. I’m not criticising anonimity, just stating that I will always stand up and be counted.
Ralph Baldwin :
Date: November 18, 2009 @ 12:20 pm
Good for you Terry.
Ex party member Barking Resident :
Date: November 18, 2009 @ 11:40 pm
Seems to me that again anyone who comments on here who says anything that is not totally in line with what is being dictated from North Street ends up with a savage attack.
You all appear to be fixated on the idea that only councillors who have been deselected are angry and outraged at the way the CLP has been hijacked by a minority, and how that minority corrupted and abused the selection process.
I would suggest you look again at the membership lists and find out just how many have resigned out of protest, or how many like me have just not renewed our membership.
But dont ever make the mistake of thinking that we will not be fighting the BNP, or organizing ourselves because we are.
You are just not taking in the anger of many Labour supporters, you are not recognizing it, or admitting it.
And as for that “walter mitty” identity kit laid out chapter and verse by Mr Baldwin or whoever he is calling himself this week there are more of us who can see you for what you are than you would give credit to.
Ralph Baldwin :
Date: November 18, 2009 @ 11:59 pm
Ex party member Barking Resident,
You are doing most of the attacking and you have insulted me for the third time.
Your doing a tad more than just saying things that are not “in line”.
In fact you are ignoring strangers you disagree with and saying they don’t exist. You are the one with the issues here. The rest od us are calling for unity against a terrible and evil threat in the form of the BNP.
You are still nagging away about your precious seat.
You are the one changing your name!
I have kept the same name from the start, how can you accuse others of doing what you are clearly doing every day, not just every week.
Dividing votes does not defeat the BNP.
Sigh. The light is on but nobody is at home are they?
You will just continue the same old hard done by rant endlessly.
You are truly one of the most selfish and diabolically ignorant people I have ever had the misforune to come across.
Your not a relation to Arnold Rimmer by any chance are you?
dagenham member :
Date: November 23, 2009 @ 5:45 pm
give it a rest will you in dagenham Rodwell and his familys antics are to well known and he aint the saint you are writing him up to be
Ralph Baldwin :
Date: November 23, 2009 @ 6:08 pm
I nebver even mentioned the guy in my last comment. Could you please make a cogent argument.
dagenham member :
Date: November 24, 2009 @ 4:32 pm
giving us all a rest then are you, cos youve been bigging him up every where else.
pigeons and roost come to mind
Labour Member :
Date: November 24, 2009 @ 10:25 pm
“Dagenham Member” what is your problem with Mr Rodwell….. As it stands he hasn’t gone for a so called safe seat and is taking on the leader of BNP. Plus he has contacted more residents in his ward with his comrades,then any other ward in the borough. Every year for the last 3 years.
I haven’t read anyone making him out to be a saint despite what you keep trying to imply, but an hard working member of the community and the labour party.
dagenham member :
Date: November 25, 2009 @ 10:33 pm
See what i mean, more than any other ward in the borough??????
well on the way to sainthood
Ralph Baldwin :
Date: November 25, 2009 @ 11:20 pm
@Dagenham member,
I think you enjoy blowing this out of proportion. I have met many good Campaigners in the Labour Party who I would not, like you consider allocating or putting forward for Sainthood, to coin your phrase.
A chap named Steve Jones was an awesome Agent in his time. He not only effectively organised and arranged voter ID in South and Mid Norfolk, he helped out in Norwich, Suffolk and Essex on occasion.
A Union man I knew some time ago when I was County candidate for Swaffham, was named Jack Body. He was a Labour Councillor for as long as anyone remembered and was respected by people across the political spectrum, so much so that when passed on, bless him, an article was written about him in the Times. I read it when I was in the armed forces.
So dagenham member I have met and seen many wonderful Labour Campaigners, some Union members, some not but all very hard working and commited.
barking united :
Date: November 26, 2009 @ 4:54 pm
Dagenham member,it seems you enjoy having a dig at Mr Rodwell,but what exactly have you done in the borough or in the community apart from using your gob.Or are you just another sad case with nothing useful to say or constructive to do??
dagenham member :
Date: November 26, 2009 @ 8:39 pm
i can only assume that barking united is referring to the football team, as there is nothing united about barking clp.
do you really want us dagenham members to start digging at your other so called candidates?
Labour Member :
Date: November 26, 2009 @ 9:02 pm
“Dagenham Member” you’ve confused me, what party are you the member of?
Because you have yet again sunk to the lowest form of debate, with threats and sarcasm.
As for digging I believe that has already been done, without success and if you are a member of the Labour Party then you start acting like one and not one of the BNP!
dagenham member :
Date: November 27, 2009 @ 12:13 pm
see there you go again, where was the threats, where was the sarcasm. yes i am a member of the labour party, but of course because i am from dagenham and prefer beer to champagne you start with your allegations of bnp.
suggest you go back and read the original article and all of the comments on this site and then perhaps you will finally get the message.
Ralph Baldwin :
Date: November 27, 2009 @ 7:51 pm
@Dagenham member
“do you want us Dagenham members to start digging at your other so-called candidates?”
That is a threat by the way.
The comment on the football team when compared to the CLP was sarcasm.
There you go another lesson
You really need to work on your performance as Arnold Rimmer, because this is very funny.
Do you look in a mirror when nobody is around and salute yourself?
Do you plan on building a throne for yourself to allow all the Councillors you can bully to bow down to you.
Please, I am really enjoying this. The irony is the group I have seen campaigning was very strong in numbers and your dramatics and bitterness are just funny.
I look forward to your reply as I go out to knock on doors tommorrow and try and undo the neglect and laziness of the past.
dagenham member :
Date: November 30, 2009 @ 3:23 pm
Do you get paid for writing this load of inflammatory old twaddle? i bet there are a lot of councillors that would love to wrap their hands round your throat and force you to eat your words.
Ralph Baldwin :
Date: November 30, 2009 @ 7:50 pm
@Dagenham member,
I would love to see them try. But that is it, this is all you have when it comes to the crunch, empty threats, vile comments and poison.
I am focussing now on doing more volunartary work wherever I can to see Labour do as well as it can across the borough, I’ll be working with real people who really do genuinly care about the area and I will do all I can to support them.
Cruddas, Hodge, whoever, I might not agree with them but they are Labour and I will do all I can to help them from people like the BNP.
dagenham member :
Date: December 1, 2009 @ 11:47 am
dont bother coming over to dagenham mate, with your attitude you wont be welcome.
Response to Dagenham Member :
Date: December 1, 2009 @ 4:34 pm
I think if you took the time to read through the comments you would find that it is the comments that are made under your alias that seem to have attitude. Littered with threats and sarcasm I think you are a disgrace to the Labour Party and should stand down. You do not represent the views of Dagenham, Barking or any other Labour voter.
a :
Date: December 3, 2009 @ 1:08 pm
Has Eastbury selection been re-run?
I see on Barking Labour website that Jeannette Alexander and James McDermott are listed as part of the “team” there.
anti BNP :
Date: December 3, 2009 @ 10:18 pm
Would be really interested to know why Ms Hodge is saying in meetings up town that the council is lost but with help she will get through.
I thought the idea was to totally wipe out the BNP and that includes those on the council.
Extreemly Frustrated Labour :
Date: December 3, 2009 @ 10:56 pm
You really do need to get a life and stop spreading your viscous rumours. Get over the fact that you were deselected and focus on something else. Hodge is working extremely hard for the residents of our borough its a shame that you say your anti BNP but still post the lies that you do? Who are you helping – no one but yourself and the BNP
anti BNP :
Date: December 4, 2009 @ 12:41 pm
You state that we should stop spreading viscous rumours, when all that was asked was a simple question of clarification.
Who ever the rabid jackel is posting as extreemly frustrated was obviously not at the meeting in the House with Ms Hodge, Searchlight and the Trade Unions.
And perhaps you need to check your facts out first, you and others seem to believe that any one who comments on here, especially if their comments do not agree with your mantra are deselect councillors or bnp.
Would you please start to give some credit that there are residents in Barking that do read this and do post comments.
Terry Wade :
Date: December 4, 2009 @ 5:08 pm
Message for anti BNP:
Can you supply us with a transcript of this meeting where you say that Margaret Hodge said that the council is lost (Presumably to the BNP)?Or, can you verify this in any other way please?
What with the reported comments in 2006 regarding 8 out of 10 of her constituents possibly voting for the BNP, this latest matter should be given the fullest publicity. It is disgraceful that a Labour MP voices such matters out loud.
Is there a 5th Column operating here?
Labour Member :
Date: December 4, 2009 @ 7:45 pm
Once again the facts as reported are wrong on this blog. Ms Hodge wasn’t present at the meeting in the house with Searchlight and the trade unions (on ministerial duty). But I understand Mr Cruddas and a number of Barking Labour Party members were in attendance with other organisations. A number of points were raised: like there was more of a threat to the council then Ms.Hodges seat and why some unions were still seating on the sidelines.
I would like to suggest to Mr Wade and Anti-BNP before you start shouting from the roof tops you should be better informed.
Terry Wade :
Date: December 4, 2009 @ 7:54 pm
I identify myself when making comment. I challenge those who are all too ready to sneer at others to identify themselves. Mind you, that takes ‘bottle’ I guess.
anti BNP :
Date: December 4, 2009 @ 10:20 pm
I would suggest that Terry Wade contacts the Editor of Searchlight who was actually at the meeting with members of the Trade Unions, he will then find that the truth will out.
And as there have been at least 2 meetings at the House M Hodge attending one of them, perhaps the North street mafia as they are begining to be known dont know all that is going on.
And just for your reassurance Terry Wade there is not a 5th column going on here just the truth.
Terry Wade :
Date: December 5, 2009 @ 11:06 am
Thanks for the info anti BNP. I’ll check it out. With regard to a 5th Column, I was looking toward North Street in this instance.
Terry Wade :
Date: December 7, 2009 @ 7:49 pm
It seems that a source close to Margaret Hodge told the Jewish Chronicle on November 19 2009 that Barking & Dagenham Council could well be controlled by the BNP in 2010. Here we go again! First the reported comments in 2006 regarding 80% of Barking’s electorate possibly voting for the BNP. Now this!
Check it out at the following web address:
http://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/22052/bnp-will-take-its-first-council-next-election
Why should the BNP bother about electioneering when Labour are doing the job for them?
Extreemly Frustrated Labour :
Date: December 7, 2009 @ 10:07 pm
Terry – this shouldn’t be a surprise for you, had you been out canvassing when you was a councillor or even just as a labour member then maybe the BNP wouldn’t be the position they are. It is very true the BNP could take the council, don’t take this lightly and criticise people who are working their damned hardest to stop this from happening.
anti BNP :
Date: December 7, 2009 @ 10:26 pm
Thanks for the further information. as for the high and mighty attitude of EFL, it certainly does not help the situation with once again the MP for Barking or her representatives going around saying “im alright, but the council is lost”.
Terry Wade :
Date: December 8, 2009 @ 5:47 pm
Dear Extreemly(sic) Frustrated Labour,
You have no idea of the efforts put in over the past 35 years by myself, and many other true socialists.
Sadly, like so many of your type, you don’t have the bottle to identify yourself.
We’ll see at the elections next year just how successful you will have been.
Say what you like in reply, but I will not be drawn in to a negative battle. North Street started this shameful state of affairs. The electorate will settle it.
Ralph Baldwin :
Date: December 12, 2009 @ 12:50 am
Does “true socilaism” include taking money as a councillor?
Ralph Baldwin :
Date: December 12, 2009 @ 12:56 am
Incidently when are we “true socialists2 going to friggin grow up and start serving the people and unifying and beating the real threat to men, women and chidren, the BNP?
Together we can wipe these buggers out. This is not abour council seats any more it is about freedom and violence.
For gods sake get a grip before it is too late, the people need you to be stong not weak and you all owe them that much after what they have given to you.
Ralph Baldwin :
Date: December 12, 2009 @ 12:57 am
Sorry for the speling I am working as I write
anti BNP :
Date: December 12, 2009 @ 1:43 pm
I always thought that all Councillors were paid an allowance, are you saying that is wrong?
And your wording is a bit off using the phrase “taking money” gives the impression of being underhanded.
barking member :
Date: December 15, 2009 @ 10:53 am
Seems to me from what ive heard on the grapevine that mr baldwin is not so averse to taking the money himself, because somehow he has been selected to stand in Mayesbrook.
Bit odd that, as some of us dont believe he is eligible and its a clear breach of the party rules. But when did party rules ever stopy the North street mafia.
Terr Wade :
Date: December 16, 2009 @ 9:37 am
Ralph Baldwin needs to answer the challenge from ‘Barking Member’ regarding his eleigibility to stand for a council seat in Barking & Dagenham. If indeed he is going to stand. Especially as his letter in the Barking & Dagenham Post of the 16th December is signed-off as being ‘via email.’
Why no local address Ralph? Haven’t got one yet? Up to the same tricks as Messrs Barnbrook and Bailey of the BNP? In the 2006 elections, they used what was in reality an ‘accommodation address’ in Barking?
A message for Tel :
Date: December 16, 2009 @ 6:24 pm
FYI Ralph lives in Barking – if you were nicer to him Im sure he would have invited you round for a cup of tea and a chat.But I don’t think he has enough time for hearsay and vindictive lies as he is too busy fighting on the ground for the people of this borough. Its a shame that some of the people who born here don’t have this fighting spirit and direct it in the right way.
Terry Wade :
Date: December 16, 2009 @ 10:18 pm
Another anonymous comment. Where’s your ‘bottle’? Yawnnnn!!!
barking member :
Date: December 17, 2009 @ 9:36 pm
Like that one Terry.
People should remember you can fool some of the people some of the time, but you cannot fool all of the people all of the time.
Ralph Baldwin :
Date: December 21, 2009 @ 11:22 pm
Terry very amusing. Very sad, desperate, bitter but amusing nonetheless.
I apologise for not responding I have been out working. Yes I live in Barking and I sent my email to the post because I prefer to use my PC than write a letter by hand.
As an environmentalist I also try and save paper.
Yes I live in Barking and yes I make an excellent cup of tea. But you don’t sound like a very nice fella so no invite for you
I have an exemplary record of service both to the Labour Party and of course to the HM Forces which I served until recently.
Yes, I served my country but now I live in Barking and Dagenham. I think I, should I choose to stand I am fully qualified to do so. I had to be interviewed, no problem, I am an activist anyway and help out in bi-elections etc whenever they occur usually in other constituences. I have done that for twenty years plus.
Admittedly I never intended to stand, my plan originally, was to support the Party both for Jon Cruddas and for margaret Hodge with their respective candidates for the council.
But I’ll give it a shot.
Oh Mr Wade, one thing. You don’t demand Jack from me sir. Nothing. I don’t answer to you and the last time I took an order it was from a brave and honorable officer not from anyone like you.
Perhaps I should demand something from you now as you seem to act and think you are an authority in the Labour Party…..I will when we meet.
Ralph Baldwin :
Date: December 21, 2009 @ 11:33 pm
@Barking Member.
Your completely wrong. Should I get elected 1/2 of the standard budget allocated to me goes to the British legion, the other 1/2 goes to a local charity. I don’t need or want the money I am content as I am.
Please do not bring me to your toilet level.
Terry Wade :
Date: December 22, 2009 @ 12:37 pm
I note your comments Ralph. I’ve also served my country. That’s not something peculiar to you.
But, I wish you and yours a Merry Christmas. I look forward to meeting you sometime.
Ralph Baldwin :
Date: December 22, 2009 @ 1:00 pm
@Terry,
Merry Christmas. I am glad you did, it cheers me.
barking member :
Date: December 22, 2009 @ 3:54 pm
I along with many people are always suspicious about those who boast about their good works. This includes what monies are given to charity and which charity.
Usually those who do the work and the giving do not want to draw attention to themselves. This is obviously not a view shared by Mr Baldwin.
As for his claim to be qualified to stand in Barking in the Local elections, I would refer him back to my earlier comment about not being able to fool all of the people all of the time.
And as for your military service, you are not the only one, as Terry has stated and as I will state, but then again its not something we wish to keep pushing down peoples throats.
Terry Wade :
Date: December 30, 2009 @ 8:25 pm
As 2010 approaches I wish everybody who reads this blog a very Happy New Year. Good health and good luck to all.
I am a politician through and through and will fight to ‘the death’ in the lead-up to May 6th. Socialism will (must) triumph. Over to the elctorate. You will get what you want. Whether what you get is what you will need is another matter.
But, don’t moan afterwards.
(Please do NOT vote BNP)!!
anti BNP :
Date: January 5, 2010 @ 6:04 pm
Happy New Year to you too Terry, could not agree with you more mate.
Ralph Baldwin :
Date: January 6, 2010 @ 12:38 am
Happy new year Terry!
Hahahahaha and what an interesting New Year it will be! Just read about a chap standing as an independent and UKIP are standing too.
All we need now are some independent council candidates to pin some blame on publically
Out with the old, in with the New!
happy 2010!
Ralph Baldwin :
Date: January 6, 2010 @ 12:58 am
Terry what party are you standing for, sorry I don’t know you and I have been very generous in providing information about myself?
Incidently those very facts I passed onto are going down well and countering the BNP’s nationalistic deceptions very well so far on the doorstep.
@Barking member
Terry wade was demanding information about me so I told him I am a bit honest like that and I respect the fact he uses his real name.
Barking Member what Party will you be standing for? I don’t know you either?
anti BNP what about you?
Ralph Baldwin :
Date: January 6, 2010 @ 2:13 am
AEveryone
Forget it, forget all of this. I shall not be commenting on this site any further I have had some bade news regarding the BNP.
@terry Wade, you may find your right on a “fight to the death”. I shall now be knocking on doors every single day leading up to the election.
Should the BNP claim the Council lives really will be at stake.
To anyone here whose first commitment is genuine and to defeat the BNP and their own political career second, I wish the very best of luck!
Forget all the unpleasantness there are worse things than arguing sociallists and they have to be defeated.
All I want to see is the BNP beaten whether, Mayesbrook is a negligable seat and I shall do all I can for the Party there, but will be available to help out in other wards if anyone feels they need supporting.
Terry Wade :
Date: January 6, 2010 @ 12:15 pm
Ralph, what is the bad news about the BNP?
anti BNP :
Date: January 6, 2010 @ 1:36 pm
Dont worry too much Terry about the so called bad news, there is no bad up to date news on the BNP that you have not been able to find out your self.
Its amazing isnt it, there we have Mr Baldwin who ever he is telling us that of course he qualifies to stand in the Local Elections in the borough, and how hard he has been working etc.
But then Terry mate he doesnt know who you are, bit odd that isnt it.
anti BNP :
Date: January 29, 2010 @ 12:17 pm
I hear the Leadership of the BNP locally are having a bit of a fall out, so much so that it has driven the Leader Bob Bailey to drink.
It seems a lot of decisions are being made behind his back such as who the BNP were going to put up in Dagenham.
Word is this really got to Bailey on Wednesday that he decided to hit the booze.
Outcome being he got thrown out of the Freedom of the Borough event that the Council put on that night.
Looks like Bailey is on a slippery road.
anti BNP :
Date: February 4, 2010 @ 12:00 pm
After reading the newspapers this morning and the proposal regarding immigration put forward by M Hodge, I think I have to ask just how further right is M Hodge prepared to go?
The BNP are going to love the suggestions she has put forward, and many in Barking and Dagenham will be angry that once again she has put her foot in it.