Private military firms ‘put lives at risk’

War on Want has accused Foreign Secretary David Miliband of putting civilian lives at risk in Afghanistan by continuing to allow private military companies based in Britain to regulate themselves.

by Tribune Web Editor
Thursday, July 23rd, 2009

by Keith Richmond

War on Want has accused Foreign Secretary David Miliband of putting civilian lives at risk in Afghanistan by continuing to allow private military companies based in Britain to regulate themselves.

The charity is calling on the Labour Government to let Parliament have a say on legislation which would ensure that firms supplying mercenaries to troublespots are subject to proper controls.

Yasmin Khan, senior campaigns officer at War on Want, said: “Letting mercenaries run loose threatens to increase abuse in Afghanistan and Iraq. David Miliband is giving private armies the power to act with impunity. The Government must scrap its voluntary code for mercenaries and bring forward genuine regulation.”

Concern about the activities of British and American based companies supplying mercenaries – often ex-servicemen and women – has been growing after evidence came to light of the widespread abuse of the human rights of civilians in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Supplying mercenaries is a lucrative business in the 21st century. The Government paid £42 million to private military companies operating in Afghanistan in the past 12 months and, in the last three years, has splashed out more than £148 million on contracts for firms in Afghanistan and Iraq

The only place you can read all of Tribune's articles as soon as they are published is in the magazine. To find out more about subscribing from as little as £19, click here.

About The Author

  • Jess Barens

    Obtuse morons like Yasmin Khan do themselves or their arguments no favours when they use unfounded sounbites like letting mercenaries “run loose”.

    Sure – our governments see real value in spending millions of pounds on essential services just so those who provide them can “run loose”.

    It’s about time these people stepped into the real world, got a grip on what they are saying, and stopped bleating in such factually incorrect terms to justify their own meaningless existance. They just make fools of themselves.

  • Jess Barens

    Obtuse morons like Yasmin Khan do themselves or their arguments no favours when they use unfounded sounbites like letting mercenaries “run loose”.

    Sure – our governments see real value in spending millions of pounds on essential services just so those who provide them can “run loose”.

    It’s about time these people stepped into the real world, got a grip on what they are saying, and stopped bleating in such factually incorrect terms to justify their own meaningless existance. They just make fools of themselves.

  • Tp

    A PMC uses CPO’s (Close protection operators) for its work, we are not mercenaries. Mercenaries are guns for higher who fight for no country or reason except money. Being a CPO is a very highly skilled and highly trained job. Maybe get the facts right next time

  • Tp

    A PMC uses CPO’s (Close protection operators) for its work, we are not mercenaries. Mercenaries are guns for higher who fight for no country or reason except money. Being a CPO is a very highly skilled and highly trained job. Maybe get the facts right next time

blog comments powered by Disqus