Archive for January, 2010

Bryan Rostron: The beautiful game and some ugly World Cup realities

By Tribune Web Editor /Sunday, January 31st, 2010

This year for South Africa is, above all, the occasion we host the World Cup. Expectations for the success of our own soccer team are miserably low, so – on the pitch at least – there is unlikely to be disappointment. Even a moderate showing will be greeted with relief, while a place in the quarter-finals would precipitate delirium.

Jill Palmer: Health checks need investment balance

By Tribune Web Editor /Sunday, January 31st, 2010

Millions of people aged between 40 and 74 could soon be given the legal right to a health check every five years. By law, the National Health Service would have to offer a barrage of tests to assess our risk of heart disease, stroke, diabetes and kidney disease.

City Hall Watch: Boris backs bankers and crushes commuters

By Tribune Web Editor /Sunday, January 31st, 2010

Murad Qureshi says that while others are clobbering bankers, London’s Mayor clobbers commuters instead

Paul Routledge: Children the victims of Doncaster’s death wish

By Tribune Web Editor /Sunday, January 31st, 2010

All human life is up ’ere, as the News of the World used to say and perhaps still does, for all I know. And more besides, indeed. The tragicomedy of Doncaster blunders on, unscripted and out of control. While the nation reeled at the sheer horror of child-on-child violence in the former pit village of Edlington, the council responsible for their care carried on its private war oblivious to the disbelieving gaze of the outside world. You think they have reached the limits of farce and they go and exceed themselves.

Cary Gee: Cash and marriage – the Tories’ horse and carriage

By Tribune Web Editor /Sunday, January 31st, 2010

How much do you love your partner? Are they worth £30 a year to you? Or perhaps £380 a year? As with much concerning Conservative Party policy, which now includes marriage, it all depends on how much money you have to begin with. That £30 per annum is approximately what the poorest married couple could expect to save under Tory proposals to give married couples a tax break. That £380 a year is how much better off those who already have a large household income could expect to be under the Tories. In fact, this constitutes a hugely redistributive tax – from poor to rich. Those at the top of the economic table would receive 13 times as much in benefits as those at the bottom.

It’s time to answer the anger

By Tribune Web Editor /Sunday, January 31st, 2010

President Obama’s bank plan is a good one and Britain should follow suit, says Stephen Beer

John Coulter: Irisgate and other crosses the deeply devout have to bear

By Tribune Web Editor /Saturday, January 30th, 2010

Many of Northern Ireland’s Protestants are demanding a new holy grail. They are in search of a new champion to replace the irreparably tarnished Iris Robinson.

Don’t let the sun go down on Teesside steelmaking

By Tribune Web Editor /Saturday, January 30th, 2010

A vital British industry can have a viable, long-term industrial future, insists Ashok Kumar

By Tribune Web Editor /Saturday, January 30th, 2010

Former Tribune editor Bob Edwards was reminiscing with colleagues from the magazine and his Fleet Street days as editor of the Sunday Mirror at a gathering in London when the current editor recalled the time he had been arrested as a spy for attempting to take photographs of the main station in Belgrade, then the [...]

Oli Usher: A hindsight test for journos

By Tribune Web Editor /Saturday, January 30th, 2010

Since actually knowing anything about how science works doesn’t seem to be a requirement for pontificating about it in the media, I’m going to play at being an ophthalmologist. The patient is the press and the diagnosis is excellent: it has perfect 20/20 hindsight.