Blair on Foot

by Tom Miller
Friday, March 12th, 2010

It’s interesting to see what Tony Blair had to say about Michael Foot. I think it is fair to say that, despite their initial romance over the relevance of Marxism, it is difficult to find two more different figures under the roof of one tent, big or small.

Part of what makes this interesting is that the 1983 defeat played such a big part of shaping Blair into the man he later became. Even given the feelgood sunshine of 1997, Blair’s politics was always undercut by a deep vein of distrust, and in certain parts, pure contempt for what went before. On a certain level this is forgivable, given the size of defeat, but it also seems to me that this created a kind of fundamental irrationality in Blair’s thought processes, encouraged by those around him.

I am currently reading Alastair Campbell’s diaries, and have only made it up to the period of the campaign against Clause IV, as it was then. Blair seems to have been utterly bemused by the objections to the Trade Unions to removing public ownership as a party commitment.

What did he expect? It’s easier to organise unions in the public sector.

At a certain level, 1983, and what Blair associated with it, started many positive things. It’s not bad to want to campaign professionally, for example.

But it also began a long distancing from the Labour movement, which ended with big privatisation contracts, and unions gathering in hundreds of thousands to march against a war started by their own party. Trust the priests of moderation to bear the icons of overreaction.

The only place you can read all of Tribune's articles as soon as they are published is in the magazine. To find out more about subscribing from as little as £19, click here.

About The Author

Tom Miller is Media and Marketing Officer for Tribune.
  • Robert

    What you have to remember that Blair was not the normal University Labour person, in fact he could have just as easy become a Tory. (wish he had)

    But Blair has come he has gone, we all have views on the war, and Blair running to America while our troops died while he made millions.

    But Foot for all the things we can say was straight to his faith his word was his bond. I met him a few times and like others of old Labour he could talk the legs off a table, as could Nye Bevan. Sadly when the dust settles and the people have either picked or dumped new Labour time will tell us about Blair, sadly I do not think it will be great, but foot will go down with the likes of Bevan as a true red socialist.

  • Robert

    What you have to remember that Blair was not the normal University Labour person, in fact he could have just as easy become a Tory. (wish he had)

    But Blair has come he has gone, we all have views on the war, and Blair running to America while our troops died while he made millions.

    But Foot for all the things we can say was straight to his faith his word was his bond. I met him a few times and like others of old Labour he could talk the legs off a table, as could Nye Bevan. Sadly when the dust settles and the people have either picked or dumped new Labour time will tell us about Blair, sadly I do not think it will be great, but foot will go down with the likes of Bevan as a true red socialist.

  • http://hands-of-the-many.blogspot.com/ james

    I think we have to understand why so much was conceded to the new orthodoxy (you can’t really call it a ‘consensus’). It was not just the ’83 election but the events equidistant to that year and ’97: the collapse of Communism. This allowed the ideologues of free-market capitalism to claim that theirs was the way forward.

    Blair famously said that governments were now held in line by global financial markets. Now it’s the other way ’round and the triumphalism has turned to introspection….

  • http://hands-of-the-many.blogspot.com/ james

    I think we have to understand why so much was conceded to the new orthodoxy (you can’t really call it a ‘consensus’). It was not just the ’83 election but the events equidistant to that year and ’97: the collapse of Communism. This allowed the ideologues of free-market capitalism to claim that theirs was the way forward.

    Blair famously said that governments were now held in line by global financial markets. Now it’s the other way ’round and the triumphalism has turned to introspection….

  • Robert

    Should have been Foots boot on Blair…..

  • Robert

    Should have been Foots boot on Blair…..