Archive for March, 2010

By Tribune Web Editor /Thursday, March 18th, 2010

A little Catholic girl who’s fallen in love

By Belinda Webb /Thursday, March 18th, 2010

The Virgin Warrior: The Life and Death of Joan of Arc by Larissa Juliet Taylor
Yale University Press, £20

The triumph of capitalism over communism and what it means for a one-time workers’ paradise

By Paul Routledge /Thursday, March 18th, 2010

Change In Putin’s Russia: Power, Money and People by Simon Pirani
Pluto Press, £14.99

Stasi Hell or Workers’ Paradise: Socialism in the GDR – What Can We Learn From It?
by John Green and Bruni de la Motte
Artery Publications, £3.50

By Tribune Web Editor /Thursday, March 18th, 2010

Paul Routledge reviews two new books on the fall of the Eastern bloc

Dave’s dodgy pals

By John Street /Wednesday, March 17th, 2010

Can’t David Cameron get anything right? First he climbs into bed with every swivel-eyed, far-right loony in the European Parliament. Then he ties the knot with the Ulster Unionists whose main purpose in life is to undo the Northern Ireland peace process. This is the party whose candidate in South Antrim at the next election – who will presumably have the official backing of the Conservatives – has been accused of making homophobic and racist remarks. Adrian Watson is on record for declaring that he would never allow gay couples to stay at his family-run B&B and has also called travellers “scum”. The strange alliance has already earned Cameron what must rate as one of the most humiliatingly hypocritical putdowns on the political stage: a plea from the old warmonger himself, George W Bush, not to derail a peace deal. Nice going, Dave.

Irregularities in the Tribune poll?

By Oli Usher /Wednesday, March 17th, 2010

Tribune’s features and comment pages – including the one with the results to our weekly online poll – go to the printers overnight on the Tuesday preceding publication. The online poll on the website isn’t usually updated until later in the week. So sometimes there’s a small discrepancy, usually no more than a few per cent, between the result we publish in the magazine and the final result which appears on the website.

This week we were asking readers what they thought the parties should do in a hung parliament: if no party has an overall majority, should there be a cross-party national government. When the pages went to press last night, a big majority – 88% – opposed a grand coalition, preferring, one assumes, minority government or a narrower coalition.

Overnight, about 200 Ramsay MacDonalds came to our site and overturned the result with their late surge in support of cross-party rule. Either that, or a single extremely committed Robert Mugabe overturned the result with some elementary computer trickery.

Whatever happened, around 200 extra votes came in in the space of a few hours, changing the result to 59% in favour and 41% against. Which is why the result on the site and the result in the magazine are so different.

Just as well our online poll is just a bit of fun and doesn’t actually decide anything important…

Bad science and the American green machine

By Glyn Ford /Wednesday, March 17th, 2010

Physics for Future Presidents: The Science Behind the Headlines by Richard Muller
WW Norton, £12.99

Ban: the man whose hour has come

By Ian Williams /Wednesday, March 17th, 2010

Our UN correspondent says that secretary-general Ban Ki-moon, against all the odds, is doing a great job

By Tribune Web Editor /Tuesday, March 16th, 2010

The Tories’ new ad might look foolish if it was more open about how the Conservative Party itself is funded. More at the Tribune Blog.

How ‘Cash Gordon’ will work in practice

By Tom Miller /Tuesday, March 16th, 2010

More here.