No co-operative spirit at the Electoral Commission

by John Street
Monday, April 26th, 2010

The Electoral Commission has already messed up the election. Many Labour and Co-operative Party candidates will lose votes due to its decision not to allow them party emblems if registering as candidates from both parties. Westminster candidates have been given the option to re-designate themselves as Labour only, should they prefer to campaign with a rose against their name and no explicit indicator of their Co-operative alignment. Council candidates, who face earlier deadlines, have not been afforded this privilege. We can only speculate as to how many votes this will cost. Will the ruling apply to joint Tory/UUP candidates in Northern Ireland? And shouldn’t an election watchdog want people to know who they are voting for?

The only place you can read all of Tribune's articles as soon as they are published is in the magazine. To find out more about subscribing from as little as £19, click here.

About The Author

John Street is Tribune's diary columnist.
  • Electoral Commission spokesper

    I would like to correct the main point made in this article. The rule that joint candidates cannot use a party emblem on the ballot papers is, in fact, a requirement in Representation of the People Act, amended in 2006, passed by Parliament. The Commission issued guidance to draw attention to this point as soon as we realised there was a problem.

  • Electoral Commission spokesperson

    I would like to correct the main point made in this article. The rule that joint candidates cannot use a party emblem on the ballot papers is, in fact, a requirement in Representation of the People Act, amended in 2006, passed by Parliament. The Commission issued guidance to draw attention to this point as soon as we realised there was a problem.

blog comments powered by Disqus