North Korea: grim, but that’s no reason to make things up

Nothing to Envy by Barbara Demick
Granta Books, £14.99

by Glyn Ford
Saturday, April 10th, 2010
Korea

Children at a North Korean orphanage. Photo: Glyn Ford

Both of these books are required reading for anyone interested in the Korean peninsula. The first represents the good, the bad and the ugly; three books in one. It is a stunning account of the unfolding of the famine in the mid to late 1990s that swept through North Korea and killed millions. Normally, the horror gets lost in the numbers. But here we have the stories of individual families from the north eastern port of Chongjin and how they suffered and died during this period.

Until the 1990s basic foodstuffs were collected fortnightly from the People’s Public Distribution Service for the whole family, but by then the system was on the verge of collapse. As one witness put it September 9 1993 was the first day she did not eat a single thing for 24 hours. Barbara Demick tracks this slow motion famine across the years as it literally decimated the country and the families described here. Few actually starved to death, instead they succumbed to a cocktail of other illnesses that ran amok among a tragically weakened population.

This is great reportage by a Los Angeles Times journalist. The problem is it’s jumbled together with two other intertwined elements, a history of North Korea and the plight of the economic migrants who travelled to China and South Korea. And the history is full of schoolgirl howlers. Early on she writes: “It was as though the war had never ended.” Well, it actually hasn’t, and one of Pyongyang’s current demands is for Washington to finally sign a peace treaty. One little acknowledged factor that makes this unlikely is the Pentagon will lose its rights to use a number of Japanese military bases if it does.

Certainly the North Koreans bear some responsibility for the famine, yet there is no mention of the fact that the CIA were well aware of what was happening and said nothing, maintaining a silence even when Pyongyang appealed for assistance in 1996 to an initially sceptical world. And there is lots more where that comes from.

She also writes about the “defectors” all of whom left the country for non-ideological reasons and none of whom, with their histories as sub-Saharan Africans, would have had a prayer of getting refugee status in the European Union. One family left to inform their South Korean relatives of the death of their father, a doctor fled because she learnt she would not be allowed to join the Korean Workers Party and a third fled after early release 20 months into a three year sentence for black marketing.

Nor is there any explicit mention of the refugee industry praying and preying on them, run through cash, con and church. But, of course, there’s none as blind as those that  will not see. Once one family member is out Seoul’s $20,000 bounty just siphons more out as the money is recycled. One example here has an initial migrant joined by six other family members – a total of $140,000.  Now all four of the women are busy working in the sex industry.

Business class “defection” at around $10,000 involves a chauffeur-driven car to the border, being carried across the Tumen River by a soldier from the Korean People’s Army, a false passport and a plane direct to Seoul. Economy class, in contrast, can be ten hours a day of reciting and copying the Bible for months on end as the further shores of Korea’s evangelicals try to brainwash one cult for another with, in conclusion, a dangerous trip to Seoul via Laos, Cambodia or Thailand. Once in Korea fools and their money are soon parted with pyramid selling scams and fruitless searches for relatives.

I took a journalist to North Korea some years ago who wrote that, on arrival, her mobile phone was confiscated. As I was with her when she arrived I inquired why she wrote something that was clearly a lie. The response was that she had been told it normally happened. Now no one should have North Korea as a poster boy for human rights. The little evidence available suggests it’s grim, but nevertheless Demick is of the same school of journalism. On page 231 she tells readers Oak-hee, one of her female protagonists, is sent to a detention camp where “obviously pregnant women are sent off for abortions, no matter how advanced the pregnancy”. Buried in the footnotes on page 311, Oak-hee is actually quoted as saying infanticide didn’t happen while she was there. But why let the facts get in the way of a good story?

Who Demick is travelling with is illustrated by her undiluted enthusiasm for the “noted North Korean scholar Nicholas Eberstadt”. Yet this Washington based neo-con was insightful enough to publish an op-ed piece in 1990 entitled: “The Coming Collapse of North Korea”.

In contrast, Cry Korea (Reginald Thompson, Reportage Press, £8.99) explains to a degree how we’ve got to where we are now. It’s a new edition of a book written by a journalist who was embedded with UN forces during the civil war – actually the US, UK and a coalition of the willing – when they razed the cities of the North to the ground and pioneered the napalm bombing of the population. A conflict still unresolved and whose wounds have yet to heal. As Barbara Castle wrote in her review in Tribune nearly 60 years ago: “No one who cares about the good name of the United Nations can read this book without shame.”

The only place you can read all of Tribune's articles as soon as they are published is in the magazine. To find out more about subscribing from as little as £19, click here.

About The Author

Glyn Ford is a former Labour MEP and author of North Korea on the Brink: Struggle for Survival
  • Barbara Demick

    Point by point, I would challenge Mr. Ford and his headline writers to state a single point in my book that is “made up.” He write that there is no “explicit mention of the refugee industry,” while in the next two paragraphs, his description of the refugee industry is lifted entirely from my book. I don’t quite understand his comments about abortion: the defector I spoke with said that abortion were ordered all the way to the end of a term, but that if a baby was born alive it was allowed to live. I have never met Mr. Eberstadt, although in several places in the book, I quote his economic statistics and note that he wrote an editorial in 1990 entitled “The Coming Collapse of North Korea” and later had to write another piece explaining why he was wrong. Mr. Ford’s writing here is sloppy, sloppy, sloppy. I doubt he’s even read my book in full. I welcome a healthy debate about North Korea, but he should check his facts and read carefully before making a libelous accusation that I’ve made things up.

  • Barbara Demick

    Point by point, I would challenge Mr. Ford and his headline writers to state a single point in my book that is “made up.” He write that there is no “explicit mention of the refugee industry,” while in the next two paragraphs, his description of the refugee industry is lifted entirely from my book. I don’t quite understand his comments about abortion: the defector I spoke with said that abortion were ordered all the way to the end of a term, but that if a baby was born alive it was allowed to live. I have never met Mr. Eberstadt, although in several places in the book, I quote his economic statistics and note that he wrote an editorial in 1990 entitled “The Coming Collapse of North Korea” and later had to write another piece explaining why he was wrong. Mr. Ford’s writing here is sloppy, sloppy, sloppy. I doubt he’s even read my book in full. I welcome a healthy debate about North Korea, but he should check his facts and read carefully before making a libelous accusation that I’ve made things up.

  • Steve

    Barbara: I’m not sure if there is much point in arguing with a card carrying KCNA member like Glyn, who is obviously trying to punch his next meal ticket in Pyongyang. I was kind of shocked that he used the word “grim” in his review. If the North Korean translators properly translate that, he could be very severely punished back in Pyongyang (or by agents abroad). Not just taking away his allowance, but potentially even a spanking. He did a very dangerous thing using that word…

  • Steve

    Barbara: I’m not sure if there is much point in arguing with a card carrying KCNA member like Glyn, who is obviously trying to punch his next meal ticket in Pyongyang. I was kind of shocked that he used the word “grim” in his review. If the North Korean translators properly translate that, he could be very severely punished back in Pyongyang (or by agents abroad). Not just taking away his allowance, but potentially even a spanking. He did a very dangerous thing using that word…

  • Face Like This :o

    Barbara: I’ve read your book. This piece is a critique of something, but it’s not a critique of your book. Mr. Ford’s implication that North Korean families defect in order to earn big money as sex workers cannot be anything but an intentional distortion. (“One example here has an initial migrant joined by six other family members – a total of $140,000. Now all four of the women are busy working in the sex industry.”) Surely Mr. Ford must understand the concept of sex slavery. This is almost literally blaming the rape victim for getting raped. I cannot think of anything more morally reprehensible than libeling the most vulnerable and exploited women and girls on earth. Congratulations, Mr. Ford. Sleep well tonight.

    As for you, Barbara, thank you very much for your very important book on such a tragic and criminally ignored subject.

  • Face Like This :o

    Barbara: I’ve read your book. This piece is a critique of something, but it’s not a critique of your book. Mr. Ford’s implication that North Korean families defect in order to earn big money as sex workers cannot be anything but an intentional distortion. (“One example here has an initial migrant joined by six other family members – a total of $140,000. Now all four of the women are busy working in the sex industry.”) Surely Mr. Ford must understand the concept of sex slavery. This is almost literally blaming the rape victim for getting raped. I cannot think of anything more morally reprehensible than libeling the most vulnerable and exploited women and girls on earth. Congratulations, Mr. Ford. Sleep well tonight.

    As for you, Barbara, thank you very much for your very important book on such a tragic and criminally ignored subject.

  • Dave

    I love the fact that this article is accompanied by an ad asking me to pay 19 pounds so I can read more articles like it every week. It’s rare that my intelligence is insulted twice in as many minutes.

  • Dave

    I love the fact that this article is accompanied by an ad asking me to pay 19 pounds so I can read more articles like it every week. It’s rare that my intelligence is insulted twice in as many minutes.

  • Glyn Ford

    Clearly my review has sparked some controversy. First let me say that I was not responsible for the headline, nor do I imply that women flee the North seeking to become sex workers in South Korea. The fact is they do, as Barbara Demick’s book demonstrates. But for a book that I describe at one point as ‘great reportage from a Los Angeles Times journalist’ I think they protest too much and in some cases substitute abuse for argument. It is when Barbara Demick moves away from reporting her protagonists to extemporising on wider themes using as background neo-con commentaries from those close to the Heritage Foundation in the US and in favour of military intervention a la Iraq that I object. As with Iraq these people have their own agenda, but its not mine. Equally as someone who has been recently been alleged to be a South Korean agent by the more fanatical friends of the North I suppose I can only expect the reverse from their enemies. My position was set out in my own book ‘North Korea on the Brink’ (Pluto, 2008) which has been translated and published in both Seoul and Tokyo. ‘As so often North Korea is its own worst enemy. Politics, like nature, abhors a vacuum. So in the absence of credible reports from Amnesty International and similar bodies, we fine substituted the testimony served up by evangelical Christian groups and the United States’ more rabid Republicans. North Korea should allow monitoring on the ground. It should provide access to the UN Special Rapporteur Vitit Muntarbhorn. It should also engage in technical cooperation with the office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights and the UN Human Rights Commission. The story they would tell would be bad or worse, but far better than the image Pyongyang allows to grow and take hold in the West’ (p140).
    I did read ‘Nothing to Envy’ in full including the footnotes, which most readers don’t, which is why I quoted the contradiction between p230-1 where Oak-hee is described arriving at the Nongpo Detention Centre and the paragraph, ‘Female prisoners filled three large rooms, so crowded that the women had to sleep in rows on the floor on their sides. Those who couldn’t fit had to sleep out by the toilets. Every few days more prisoners arrived, usually about a hundred at a time. The guards strip searched the new arrivals, seperating those obviously pregnant and sending them off for abortions, no matter how advanced the pregnancy.’ and the footnote on p311 that states ‘Oak-hee said she did not know of infanticide taking place at the time she was there. She believes it is possible that the practice was discontinued in 2001 before her arrest’.

  • Glyn Ford

    Clearly my review has sparked some controversy. First let me say that I was not responsible for the headline, nor do I imply that women flee the North seeking to become sex workers in South Korea. The fact is they do, as Barbara Demick’s book demonstrates. But for a book that I describe at one point as ‘great reportage from a Los Angeles Times journalist’ I think they protest too much and in some cases substitute abuse for argument. It is when Barbara Demick moves away from reporting her protagonists to extemporising on wider themes using as background neo-con commentaries from those close to the Heritage Foundation in the US and in favour of military intervention a la Iraq that I object. As with Iraq these people have their own agenda, but its not mine. Equally as someone who has been recently been alleged to be a South Korean agent by the more fanatical friends of the North I suppose I can only expect the reverse from their enemies. My position was set out in my own book ‘North Korea on the Brink’ (Pluto, 2008) which has been translated and published in both Seoul and Tokyo. ‘As so often North Korea is its own worst enemy. Politics, like nature, abhors a vacuum. So in the absence of credible reports from Amnesty International and similar bodies, we fine substituted the testimony served up by evangelical Christian groups and the United States’ more rabid Republicans. North Korea should allow monitoring on the ground. It should provide access to the UN Special Rapporteur Vitit Muntarbhorn. It should also engage in technical cooperation with the office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights and the UN Human Rights Commission. The story they would tell would be bad or worse, but far better than the image Pyongyang allows to grow and take hold in the West’ (p140).
    I did read ‘Nothing to Envy’ in full including the footnotes, which most readers don’t, which is why I quoted the contradiction between p230-1 where Oak-hee is described arriving at the Nongpo Detention Centre and the paragraph, ‘Female prisoners filled three large rooms, so crowded that the women had to sleep in rows on the floor on their sides. Those who couldn’t fit had to sleep out by the toilets. Every few days more prisoners arrived, usually about a hundred at a time. The guards strip searched the new arrivals, seperating those obviously pregnant and sending them off for abortions, no matter how advanced the pregnancy.’ and the footnote on p311 that states ‘Oak-hee said she did not know of infanticide taking place at the time she was there. She believes it is possible that the practice was discontinued in 2001 before her arrest’.

  • http://www.tribunemagazine.co.uk Tribune web editor

    A (minor) point of clarification: the “no reason to make things up” part of the headline refers to this line of the article:

    I took a journalist to North Korea some years ago who wrote that, on arrival, her mobile phone was confiscated. As I was with her when she arrived I inquired why she wrote something that was clearly a lie. The response was that she had been told it normally happened.

  • http://www.tribunemagazine.co.uk Tribune web editor

    A (minor) point of clarification: the “no reason to make things up” part of the headline refers to this line of the article:

    I took a journalist to North Korea some years ago who wrote that, on arrival, her mobile phone was confiscated. As I was with her when she arrived I inquired why she wrote something that was clearly a lie. The response was that she had been told it normally happened.

  • Face Like This :o

    Web editor: And you don’t think that headline is just a trifle misleading, given that the subhead is “Nothing to Envy by Barbara Demick Granta Books, £14.99″? The assertion from which you crafted your headline is from the antepenultimate paragraph–an (arguably unrelated) afterthought to the book review. Anyone with even a passing knowledge of journalistic practice knows that a headline is supposed to describe the main point(s) of an article–in this case, a book review. So do we owe this terribly misleading headline to incompetent editing or to an overt political agenda?

  • Face Like This :o

    Web editor: And you don’t think that headline is just a trifle misleading, given that the subhead is “Nothing to Envy by Barbara Demick Granta Books, £14.99″? The assertion from which you crafted your headline is from the antepenultimate paragraph–an (arguably unrelated) afterthought to the book review. Anyone with even a passing knowledge of journalistic practice knows that a headline is supposed to describe the main point(s) of an article–in this case, a book review. So do we owe this terribly misleading headline to incompetent editing or to an overt political agenda?

  • slim

    North Korea used to make foreign visitors deposit their cellphones at the airport and pick them up when they left. I don’t know if they still do that.

    But please, being “close to the Heritage Foundation” is hardly damnation, especially coming from a failed fringe politician who is “close to Planet DPRK”. Only lackeys, stooges and flunkeys — or other odious dictators — get the deferential treatment Ford gets from KCNA. (Eberstadt is at the AEI in any case.)

    How can Glyn Ford live with himself publishing these distortions in 2010, when there are so many sources of authoritative information on North Korea?

    This tripe ALMOST makes me hope there’s a lamppost and noose with Ford’s name on it ready in Pyongyang when the system finally crashes.

  • Face Like This :o

    A question for Mr. Ford, who broached the issue in his article: Who is more responsible for the abysmal conditions in North Korea today: the United States or Kim Jung-Il and his government?

  • slim

    North Korea used to make foreign visitors deposit their cellphones at the airport and pick them up when they left. I don’t know if they still do that.

    But please, being “close to the Heritage Foundation” is hardly damnation, especially coming from a failed fringe politician who is “close to Planet DPRK”. Only lackeys, stooges and flunkeys — or other odious dictators — get the deferential treatment Ford gets from KCNA. (Eberstadt is at the AEI in any case.)

    How can Glyn Ford live with himself publishing these distortions in 2010, when there are so many sources of authoritative information on North Korea?

    This tripe ALMOST makes me hope there’s a lamppost and noose with Ford’s name on it ready in Pyongyang when the system finally crashes.

  • Face Like This :o

    A question for Mr. Ford, who broached the issue in his article: Who is more responsible for the abysmal conditions in North Korea today: the United States or Kim Jung-Il and his government?

  • Steve

    Clearly it’s the U.S.’s fault that things are so crappy in N.K. now. Glyn has brilliantly defended the right of N.K. to spend all its money to obtain nuclear weapons rather than feed its populace, because of the grave threat that the U.S. poses. Clearly the regime is entitled to protect itself at all costs from the U.S. imperialists who prevented the unification of the peninsula under the benevolent Kim Il Sung.

    The world is still awaiting Glyn’s follow-up piece, which will brilliantly defend the North Korean elite’s right to import yachts and other luxury goods while the North’s population starves and its right to maintain a massive harem. This will be the more challenging piece for Glyn to write, but I remain convinced that he is up to the challenge!

  • Steve

    Clearly it’s the U.S.’s fault that things are so crappy in N.K. now. Glyn has brilliantly defended the right of N.K. to spend all its money to obtain nuclear weapons rather than feed its populace, because of the grave threat that the U.S. poses. Clearly the regime is entitled to protect itself at all costs from the U.S. imperialists who prevented the unification of the peninsula under the benevolent Kim Il Sung.

    The world is still awaiting Glyn’s follow-up piece, which will brilliantly defend the North Korean elite’s right to import yachts and other luxury goods while the North’s population starves and its right to maintain a massive harem. This will be the more challenging piece for Glyn to write, but I remain convinced that he is up to the challenge!

  • http://freekorea.us Joshua Stanton

    I can’t see the purpose for a book review if the reviewer isn’t capable of careful reading or honest writing. Ford makes so many jarring factual errors that I wonder what book he even read. I can’t tell what’s more repulsive — his contempt for the refugees themselves, or his factually inaccurate and illogical defense of the regime that willfully let this famine happen. And if Ford is going to engage in a selective and deceptive exercise in guilt by association, doesn’t he owe it to his readers to disclose the frequency with which he’s cited in Pyongyang’s own Korea Central News Agency?

  • http://freekorea.us Joshua Stanton

    I can’t see the purpose for a book review if the reviewer isn’t capable of careful reading or honest writing. Ford makes so many jarring factual errors that I wonder what book he even read. I can’t tell what’s more repulsive — his contempt for the refugees themselves, or his factually inaccurate and illogical defense of the regime that willfully let this famine happen. And if Ford is going to engage in a selective and deceptive exercise in guilt by association, doesn’t he owe it to his readers to disclose the frequency with which he’s cited in Pyongyang’s own Korea Central News Agency?

  • Dan Davidson

    I utterly fail to understand how people, like Mr. Ford, who live in a free society with access to all kinds of information can apologize for a regime that without a doubt stands in the same league as the Third Reich and Democratic Kampuchea. How can a Westerner defend North Korea’s ‘uri minjokkgiri’ race-based nuttery? Isn’t this a little like a Jew defending the Nazis—the object of the hate defending the hate? Mrs. Demick’s book, regardless of her political orientation, is consillient with the facts that have emerged from North Korea over the past 20 years for defectors and undercover reporter sources. Mr. Ford’s most egregious claim is his assertion that the CIA is in some way to blame for the North’s famine. This is utter nonsense. A repressive dictator refuses to change his kleptocratic, bankrupt, failed regime so he can maintain his posh lifestyle and somehow you find it acceptable to blame the CIA? Wow. There is no question whatsoever that North Korea’s famine was its own doing.

  • Dan Davidson

    I utterly fail to understand how people, like Mr. Ford, who live in a free society with access to all kinds of information can apologize for a regime that without a doubt stands in the same league as the Third Reich and Democratic Kampuchea. How can a Westerner defend North Korea’s ‘uri minjokkgiri’ race-based nuttery? Isn’t this a little like a Jew defending the Nazis—the object of the hate defending the hate? Mrs. Demick’s book, regardless of her political orientation, is consillient with the facts that have emerged from North Korea over the past 20 years for defectors and undercover reporter sources. Mr. Ford’s most egregious claim is his assertion that the CIA is in some way to blame for the North’s famine. This is utter nonsense. A repressive dictator refuses to change his kleptocratic, bankrupt, failed regime so he can maintain his posh lifestyle and somehow you find it acceptable to blame the CIA? Wow. There is no question whatsoever that North Korea’s famine was its own doing.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Ewffewafea-Gafeaweefwa/100002607562369 Ewffewafea Gafeaweefwa

    What an utter cretin.

blog comments powered by Disqus