David Miliband’s statement

What counts now is next Labour: that’s why I’m standing to be Labour’s next leader

by David Miliband
Thursday, May 27th, 2010

The challenge facing our movement is to reform, rebuild and reconnect in opposition – and then be ready to fight and win the next general election. I am standing to be leader of the Labour Party because I am an idealist about Britain and the potential of politics to change our country for the better.

I believe that you judge a country by the condition of the weak not just the strong, that you build strong communities on responsibilities as well as rights, that we are joined by humanity and self-interest with people around the globe. Those are the values of my upbringing.

I believe we need a market economy but not a market society. There are values beyond markets that it is our duty to nurture: justice, compassion, sustainability. That is what my community in South Shields stands for.

I believe injustice is real but not inevitable, and it is the job of politics to attack it, at home and abroad. That is what I have tried to do in government.

While there were silver linings on election night, we have to be honest that we lost, and lost badly, to a Conservative Party which people did not want to vote for. In a change election, we were perceived to be defending the old order. Future is the most important word in politics, but we looked out of time.

If we’re brutally honest, for too many people, we were not the people’s party that was created a century ago, but the politicians’ party. We were perceived by too many voters – our people – as out of touch. We all agreed we need to renew in government but we did not manage to make it real.

On policy, we were neither proud enough of our record, humble enough about our mistakes, nor clear enough about our offer. We lost focus on education and anti-social behaviour. We were playing catch-up on political reform, immigration and housing.

On culture and organisation, we did not symbolise today’s requirements for openness, participation and dialogue. We talked about new politics, but did not escape the image of politics as a game not a calling.

The result is that our conversation with the public broke down. We need to restart it with our most precious asset – our idealism for a better future.

Idealism is the lifeblood of our party. Not that we think we will build heaven on earth, but that we should try. The beating heart of progressive values in Britain has not been stilled. What we lost was the sense that the Labour Party could be the vehicle for the implementation of those values.

In putting that right we must start with one vow more important than any other. The Tony Blair/Gordon Brown era is over. I am not interested in politics defined as Blairite or Brownite. New Labour isn’t new any more. We learn from it, we benefit from it, we seek to emulate its successes but not repeat its mantras.

New Labour did fantastic things for the country. But now we are out of power, what counts is next Labour. Listening, idealistic, open, engaged, thoughtful, radical, decisive, Labour. So what do we need to rebuild and win again?

First, we must reconnect with our values and our voters – because politics without values is not just barren; it is unsuccessful. We should have made eradicating child poverty a mass movement for social change led by the Labour Government. Instead it became a target to meet.

Second, we must renew our ideology and ideas. The best of the last 13 years has been transformative, but we have to be honest about our mistakes. I stand for individual freedom and social justice, the two traditions of progressive politics in Britain. We succeed when we make them partners, as with the national minimum wage; we fail when they become enemies. We must make them partners again.

Third, we must renew our party so we become a movement for change in our communities as well as an election-winning machine. I am convinced that many of the seats we held onto were because of the work done by local activists in their local communities. They know what works – we have to learn from them.

As a start, we need to engage far better with the three million trade unionists who choose to pay the political levy in what I believe is a positive act of democratic participation. We should also look at what sister socialist parties around the world have done, with experiments such as free party membership and building up connections with civic society that new media make possible.

I know what sort of Britain I want to live in: one where people have the power to determine their destiny, where they have security against risks beyond their control and a sense of belonging in the world. And I know what sort of Labour Party we need to deliver that Britain: a living, breathing movement and not just a machine.

The task before our movement is simple to state and hard to achieve: to select a leader who can fire the imagination, unite different talents, be a credible candidate for Prime Minister and above all else win the battle of ideas. I am confident I have the beliefs not just to win an election, but also to lead change in the country. l

Next week: Ed Balls and Ed Miliband present their visions for the future of the Labour Party

The only place you can read all of Tribune's articles as soon as they are published is in the magazine. To find out more about subscribing from as little as £19, click here.

About The Author

David Miliband is Labour MP for South Shields
  • Sean

    I am none the wiser, David. The only policy you list is to “look at free party membership”. You talk about “eradicating child poverty” but you show no inclination to change the economic circumstances which creates and relies on this poverty. Where are the answers to the big questions facing Britain?

    How do we close the widening gap between rich and poor; how do we re-configure our economy to make it the servant of the people rather than their master; how do we ensure that power, privelege and opportunity do not continue to be monopolised by an elite ruling class?

    Either you don’t believe these are questions that need answers or you just don’t have the answers. Whichever it is, I doubt this uninspiring rhetoric laden stuff will get you any votes.

  • Sean

    I am none the wiser, David. The only policy you list is to “look at free party membership”. You talk about “eradicating child poverty” but you show no inclination to change the economic circumstances which creates and relies on this poverty. Where are the answers to the big questions facing Britain?

    How do we close the widening gap between rich and poor; how do we re-configure our economy to make it the servant of the people rather than their master; how do we ensure that power, privelege and opportunity do not continue to be monopolised by an elite ruling class?

    Either you don’t believe these are questions that need answers or you just don’t have the answers. Whichever it is, I doubt this uninspiring rhetoric laden stuff will get you any votes.

  • http://twitter.com/JerichoAdmassu Jeri

    From a neglected voter, a story of Labour love regained

    With the formation of the Conservative – Liberal Democrat coaliton and David Cameron’s subsequent elevation to Prime Minister, the Labour party finds itself in the oppostion side for the first time since 1997. It appears that a majority of the people have decided that they no longer trust the Labour party to preside over the next goverment. Was it military action in Iraq that changed people’s minds? Had the cash for peerage scandal dissuaded support? Perhaps the expenses scandal had eroded all trust?

    The halcyon days of Labour seem like a lifetime ago. We cannot deny that Labour is as much responsible for it’s own slip – ups as anyone else. The rut that Labour finds itself in now is to be expected as even the most ardent supporter would have to question if Labour had lost it’s way. Perhaps it’s fitting that the newest generation of Labour MP’s are calling an end to New Labour and a rebirth of the one time representative of the working class.

    And as for me, why did I desert you? You stopped listening, caring, you ceased being the party you came from, the party for the people. You forgot you were here to speak up for me. The only time Labour remembered the workers,pensioners and one parent families was when it neared election time and now, as we’ve seen, when you are ousted from Goverment. The ones who did care, were always kept on the back benches, out of the way, so as not to tarnish New, Glossy Labour with the traditional values its founding fathers stood for.

    I asked myself one question; if my disappointment in the last goverment is reason enough to let go of the party that is built on the backs of the working class. I decided the Labour Party is much bigger than the last 13 years. It’s about Bevan and Atlee, and the National Health Service. It’s about the greatest welfare state on earth.

    Now more than ever you are in a position to truly redifine Labour or in other words rediscover what it stands for.

    Whoever wins this leadership contest ,please don’t ever let us down again.

  • http://twitter.com/JerichoAdmassu Jeri

    From a neglected voter, a story of Labour love regained

    With the formation of the Conservative – Liberal Democrat coaliton and David Cameron’s subsequent elevation to Prime Minister, the Labour party finds itself in the oppostion side for the first time since 1997. It appears that a majority of the people have decided that they no longer trust the Labour party to preside over the next goverment. Was it military action in Iraq that changed people’s minds? Had the cash for peerage scandal dissuaded support? Perhaps the expenses scandal had eroded all trust?

    The halcyon days of Labour seem like a lifetime ago. We cannot deny that Labour is as much responsible for it’s own slip – ups as anyone else. The rut that Labour finds itself in now is to be expected as even the most ardent supporter would have to question if Labour had lost it’s way. Perhaps it’s fitting that the newest generation of Labour MP’s are calling an end to New Labour and a rebirth of the one time representative of the working class.

    And as for me, why did I desert you? You stopped listening, caring, you ceased being the party you came from, the party for the people. You forgot you were here to speak up for me. The only time Labour remembered the workers,pensioners and one parent families was when it neared election time and now, as we’ve seen, when you are ousted from Goverment. The ones who did care, were always kept on the back benches, out of the way, so as not to tarnish New, Glossy Labour with the traditional values its founding fathers stood for.

    I asked myself one question; if my disappointment in the last goverment is reason enough to let go of the party that is built on the backs of the working class. I decided the Labour Party is much bigger than the last 13 years. It’s about Bevan and Atlee, and the National Health Service. It’s about the greatest welfare state on earth.

    Now more than ever you are in a position to truly redifine Labour or in other words rediscover what it stands for.

    Whoever wins this leadership contest ,please don’t ever let us down again.

  • http://spiritleveller.wordpress.com/ Spirit Leveller

    I’ve been thinking of writing a piece about the senior Miliband brother for some time now but, uninspiring character that he is, I’ve not been able to cultivate sufficient bile to force me to put finger to keyboard; that is, until the ‘statement’ published in today’s online version of Tribune appeared.

    The utter vacuity of this ‘statement’ initially left me questioning why so many members of the PLP be have allowed themselves to be suduced by this man’s empty rhetoric? I can only assume that his supporters, like many Labour politicians, forgot long ago the reasons they ‘came in to politics’; instead,preferring to exist as creatures of pure subjective rationality, motivated by a desire to choose the next the next Labour Prime Minister as opposed to the most appropriate person to lead the party.

    How on earth, for example, can the son of one of the most prominent Marxists of the 20th century produce such nonsense as “I believe we need a market economy but not a market society”? To completely fail to grasp the relationship between a society’s prevailing economic infrastructure and it social superstructure in this way actually terrifies me.

    He is quite right to assert that “there are values beyond markets…nurture: justice, compassion, sustainability” but fails spectacularly to understand how inextricably linked our economic and social relations are and, therefore, the fact that without a much more economically equitable society, ‘justice, compassion, and sustainability’ – not to mention communitarian values – cannot thrive.

    Regardless of his dismissal of the “New Labour…mantras” , nothing could sum up David Miliband’s deeply ingrained Blairite tendencies more concisely than his disclosure that “now we are out of power, what counts is next Labour… so what do we need to rebuild and win again?”. For him, power is not a means by which deliver the kind of democratic socialist policies that would have a profound, lasting, and positive effect on the society in which we live, but end in itself. This is a consistent theme of the New Labour movement and one which has continued apace in their post-defeat writings, such as Liam Byrne’s truly dire Why did Labour Lose – and How Do We Win Again? , which places the acquisition and retention of power at its very core.

    This is why the Blairites place such a strong emphasis on the importance of introducing measures such as open primaries, “free membership”, and other initiatives designed to ensure a rapid return to power; regardless of whether that power depends upon, and is compromised by, the support of those who have never and will never subscribe to the party’s core beliefs.

    If the Labour Party’s leadership really were socialists, what they would be focusing on at this point is the things we need to do to create the kind of economy in which everybody benefits; the kind of education system in which everybody has an equal opportunity to fulfill their potential; and the kind of health service in which people are treated with dignity and receive the finest treatment money can buy, regardless of their ability to pay. What we should be focusing on is where we’ve failed in this mission and what we now need to do to become the kind of party that the electorate expect us to be.

    Achieve these core socialist goals – the first in particular – and you’ll have created the circumstances in which a wide variety of negative social phenomena are reduced and in which communities can flourish. Substantive, ideologically driven proposals like this are what will bring about positive material changes to the society we live in, not the shallow management speak of “listening, idealistic, open, engaged, thoughtful, radical, decisive, Labour” used by Mr Miliband.

    At one point in this article David Miliband said “if we’re brutally honest, for too many people, we were not the people’s party that was created a century ago”. Ironically, if we elect him as our leader, that reality won’t be changing any time soon.

  • http://spiritleveller.wordpress.com/ Spirit Leveller

    I’ve been thinking of writing a piece about the senior Miliband brother for some time now but, uninspiring character that he is, I’ve not been able to cultivate sufficient bile to force me to put finger to keyboard; that is, until the ‘statement’ published in today’s online version of Tribune appeared.

    The utter vacuity of this ‘statement’ initially left me questioning why so many members of the PLP be have allowed themselves to be suduced by this man’s empty rhetoric? I can only assume that his supporters, like many Labour politicians, forgot long ago the reasons they ‘came in to politics’; instead,preferring to exist as creatures of pure subjective rationality, motivated by a desire to choose the next the next Labour Prime Minister as opposed to the most appropriate person to lead the party.

    How on earth, for example, can the son of one of the most prominent Marxists of the 20th century produce such nonsense as “I believe we need a market economy but not a market society”? To completely fail to grasp the relationship between a society’s prevailing economic infrastructure and it social superstructure in this way actually terrifies me.

    He is quite right to assert that “there are values beyond markets…nurture: justice, compassion, sustainability” but fails spectacularly to understand how inextricably linked our economic and social relations are and, therefore, the fact that without a much more economically equitable society, ‘justice, compassion, and sustainability’ – not to mention communitarian values – cannot thrive.

    Regardless of his dismissal of the “New Labour…mantras” , nothing could sum up David Miliband’s deeply ingrained Blairite tendencies more concisely than his disclosure that “now we are out of power, what counts is next Labour… so what do we need to rebuild and win again?”. For him, power is not a means by which deliver the kind of democratic socialist policies that would have a profound, lasting, and positive effect on the society in which we live, but end in itself. This is a consistent theme of the New Labour movement and one which has continued apace in their post-defeat writings, such as Liam Byrne’s truly dire Why did Labour Lose – and How Do We Win Again? , which places the acquisition and retention of power at its very core.

    This is why the Blairites place such a strong emphasis on the importance of introducing measures such as open primaries, “free membership”, and other initiatives designed to ensure a rapid return to power; regardless of whether that power depends upon, and is compromised by, the support of those who have never and will never subscribe to the party’s core beliefs.

    If the Labour Party’s leadership really were socialists, what they would be focusing on at this point is the things we need to do to create the kind of economy in which everybody benefits; the kind of education system in which everybody has an equal opportunity to fulfill their potential; and the kind of health service in which people are treated with dignity and receive the finest treatment money can buy, regardless of their ability to pay. What we should be focusing on is where we’ve failed in this mission and what we now need to do to become the kind of party that the electorate expect us to be.

    Achieve these core socialist goals – the first in particular – and you’ll have created the circumstances in which a wide variety of negative social phenomena are reduced and in which communities can flourish. Substantive, ideologically driven proposals like this are what will bring about positive material changes to the society we live in, not the shallow management speak of “listening, idealistic, open, engaged, thoughtful, radical, decisive, Labour” used by Mr Miliband.

    At one point in this article David Miliband said “if we’re brutally honest, for too many people, we were not the people’s party that was created a century ago”. Ironically, if we elect him as our leader, that reality won’t be changing any time soon.

  • http://disparatestraights.blogspot.com Gordon Comstock

    I can hardly improve on SpiritLeveller’s comments above, this is vague and wooly stuff by David Milliband which one can clearly imagine Blair uttering with that look of utmost sincerity he perfected but it takes no clear stand on any real issues such as : taking power away from private financial operations, radical change in the welfare system to provide an adequate basic entitlement for all citizens, a written constitution that would, amoung other things, prevent the country being going to war on the Prime Minster’s decision and the confusion over legitimacy that ensued after the last election when it was left to various ‘experts’ and ignorant populist newspaper commentators to tell us what the position was.
    The Nationalisation of public infrastructure services such as railways, water supply, energy distribution : is it now simply accepted that now these are in the private sector they are to remain so ad infinitum ?
    This is not a robust Socialist agenda.
    I am sorry Jeri, but if you think we have ‘the best welfare system in the world’ you cannot have had any experience of it. Our weekly JSA of £65 stands at 10.5% of average earnings, the lowest it has ever been. It is increasingly conditional with mandatory impositions and sanctions. Any loans from the Social Fund, maximum just under £350, is then automatically deducted from the £65 a week while still unwaged. Energy companies can also take direct payments out if you are in arrears. There is no minimum amount that one is entitled to receive. I currently am expected to survive on just over £50 a week after these deductions.
    Despite the fact that the UK Government has signed numerous declarations, covenants, conventions and charters which place an obligation to ensure an adequate standard of income for all its citizens, compared to all other major European countries the provision in this country is a complex and woefully inadequate system that does not meet these requirements which have been ignored by Conservative and ( new ) Labour administrations with equal distain for the poorest and most vunerable in our society for over thirty years.
    It is very, very difficult for an individual to stand up against the powerful vested interests that call themselves financial service providers and credit rating agencies but if Governments dont then God help us. That is what you are there for, to make the rules, speculative currency trading could be stopped altogether if there was the political will to do it.
    I see no sign whatsoever that a Labour Party led by a David Milliband would take on these monsters and their apologists.

  • http://disparatestraights.blogspot.com Gordon Comstock

    I can hardly improve on SpiritLeveller’s comments above, this is vague and wooly stuff by David Milliband which one can clearly imagine Blair uttering with that look of utmost sincerity he perfected but it takes no clear stand on any real issues such as : taking power away from private financial operations, radical change in the welfare system to provide an adequate basic entitlement for all citizens, a written constitution that would, amoung other things, prevent the country being going to war on the Prime Minster’s decision and the confusion over legitimacy that ensued after the last election when it was left to various ‘experts’ and ignorant populist newspaper commentators to tell us what the position was.
    The Nationalisation of public infrastructure services such as railways, water supply, energy distribution : is it now simply accepted that now these are in the private sector they are to remain so ad infinitum ?
    This is not a robust Socialist agenda.
    I am sorry Jeri, but if you think we have ‘the best welfare system in the world’ you cannot have had any experience of it. Our weekly JSA of £65 stands at 10.5% of average earnings, the lowest it has ever been. It is increasingly conditional with mandatory impositions and sanctions. Any loans from the Social Fund, maximum just under £350, is then automatically deducted from the £65 a week while still unwaged. Energy companies can also take direct payments out if you are in arrears. There is no minimum amount that one is entitled to receive. I currently am expected to survive on just over £50 a week after these deductions.
    Despite the fact that the UK Government has signed numerous declarations, covenants, conventions and charters which place an obligation to ensure an adequate standard of income for all its citizens, compared to all other major European countries the provision in this country is a complex and woefully inadequate system that does not meet these requirements which have been ignored by Conservative and ( new ) Labour administrations with equal distain for the poorest and most vunerable in our society for over thirty years.
    It is very, very difficult for an individual to stand up against the powerful vested interests that call themselves financial service providers and credit rating agencies but if Governments dont then God help us. That is what you are there for, to make the rules, speculative currency trading could be stopped altogether if there was the political will to do it.
    I see no sign whatsoever that a Labour Party led by a David Milliband would take on these monsters and their apologists.

blog comments powered by Disqus