The next big thing is broken Britain

Once upon a time, a Conservative leader pronounced that there was no such thing as society. Then, another leader came along to trounce that fatuous notion

by Tribune Editorial
Friday, July 23rd, 2010

Once upon a time, a Conservative leader pronounced that there was no such thing as society. Then, after the party had spent long years in the wilderness, another leader came along to trounce that fatuous notion and declare that there had to be a Big Society. He called his vision “the biggest, most dramatic redistribution of power” from the state to individualism.

Many of the workers in this state worried about this because, to them, it sounded more like a cover for one of the biggest-ever cuts in public spending. In this Big Society, there were fewer jobs – many, many, fewer jobs. Those in need of help from the state had to go without because the state was on a crash slimming diet and its ability to function cohesively dwindled. But it was not all bad news. Public services that once soaked up so much of the taxpayers’ own money were replaced by voluntary groups and charities. It was called Austerity and the new leader said it was unavoidable. Just like in those jolly old Victorian times, whose values were once extolled by the former Tory leader, the poor would be elevated to become once again that more noble of species, the Needy Poor. Not to be confused with the Undeserving Poor.

Moreover, there would be many winners in this Big Society. Bankers would continue to gorge on immeasurable profits while the Deserving Greed of clever entrepreneurs would see healthy profits made on the privatisation of the health and education services. Doubters claimed that the new Tory leader was simply taking advantage of a crisis to impose an unwritten agenda which became known as the Conservative Ideology and doing it with the assistance of his new friends in a tribe called the Lib Dems.

Alas, it did not end well. Society became so broken that the former Tory leader’s words did indeed prove prophetic.

* * *

There is much good to be said of the Green Party’s intentions. Many will share Carl Rowlands’ welcome (page 13) of the election of Caroline Lucas as a Westminster MP. Many more might lament the fact that, in order to get there, she had to beat an exceptional Labour candidate in Nancy Platts, who by any standards showed the promise of being an outstanding parliamentary representative.
That said, the election of the Greens’ first MP, their “foot in the door of Westminster”, is occasion to shine the policy spotlight on a party that has always needed to be taken more seriously than the  mainstream media generally care to. Not least it has been seen by a significant number of Labour voters as a safe – or, even, positive – alternative, either tactically or as a frustrated protest against the vagaries of New Labour.

But it is as well to know who your friends are and, as Carl Rowlands shows, Greens across Europe have some not so savoury political allies and prop up anti-progressive policies. As he says, the green revolution is one which leaves the main redoubts of capitalism and ownership untouched. Be careful what we wish – or vote – for.

The only place you can read all of Tribune's articles as soon as they are published is in the magazine. To find out more about subscribing from as little as £19, click here.

About The Author

  • terence patrick hewett

    What she actually said was:

    “There is no such thing as society. There is living tapestry of men and women and people and the beauty of that tapestry and the quality of our lives will depend upon how much each of us is prepared to take responsibility for ourselves and each of us prepared to turn round and help by our own efforts those who are unfortunate. And the worst things we have in life, in my view, are where children who are a great privilege and a trust … we have these little innocents and the worst crime in life is when those children, who would naturally have the right to look to their parents for help, for comfort, not only just for the food and shelter but for the time, for the understanding, turn round and not only is that help not forthcoming, but they get either neglect or worse than that, cruelty.”

    And:

    “It is our duty to look after ourselves and then also to help look after our neighbour and life is a reciprocal business”

    http://www.margaretthatcher.org/speeches/displaydocument.asp?docid=106689

    She was describing how collectivism saps personal responsibility even towards your own family, and she was dead right.

  • terence patrick hewett

    What she actually said was:

    “There is no such thing as society. There is living tapestry of men and women and people and the beauty of that tapestry and the quality of our lives will depend upon how much each of us is prepared to take responsibility for ourselves and each of us prepared to turn round and help by our own efforts those who are unfortunate. And the worst things we have in life, in my view, are where children who are a great privilege and a trust … we have these little innocents and the worst crime in life is when those children, who would naturally have the right to look to their parents for help, for comfort, not only just for the food and shelter but for the time, for the understanding, turn round and not only is that help not forthcoming, but they get either neglect or worse than that, cruelty.”

    And:

    “It is our duty to look after ourselves and then also to help look after our neighbour and life is a reciprocal business”

    http://www.margaretthatcher.org/speeches/displaydocument.asp?docid=106689

    She was describing how collectivism saps personal responsibility even towards your own family, and she was dead right.

  • Adam Colclough

    On the face of it the ‘big society’ sounds like the sort of thing governments dream up while they’re still wet behind the ears and rapidly shelve when the cynicism of being in office sets in.

    In the incarnation espoused by David Cameron it sounds like a project for keeping local people busy whilst hiding the number of jobs being destroyed by cuts to government spending.

    The real test of the big society though will be just how difficult it allows local communities to make things for government on a local or national level

    For example what will be the response of the government to local people challenging the imposition of the academy schools on areas where there is little public enthusiasm for them?

    I’d say that if by this time next year there are communities that have had imposed on them huge, soulless academies when what they really wanted was small community schools the ‘big society’ will have proved itself to be just so much hot air.

  • Adam Colclough

    On the face of it the ‘big society’ sounds like the sort of thing governments dream up while they’re still wet behind the ears and rapidly shelve when the cynicism of being in office sets in.

    In the incarnation espoused by David Cameron it sounds like a project for keeping local people busy whilst hiding the number of jobs being destroyed by cuts to government spending.

    The real test of the big society though will be just how difficult it allows local communities to make things for government on a local or national level

    For example what will be the response of the government to local people challenging the imposition of the academy schools on areas where there is little public enthusiasm for them?

    I’d say that if by this time next year there are communities that have had imposed on them huge, soulless academies when what they really wanted was small community schools the ‘big society’ will have proved itself to be just so much hot air.

blog comments powered by Disqus