Tensions build in Western Sahara endgame

Still waiting for justice, the Saharawi people are again the victims of Moroccan violence, reports Stefan Simanowitz

by Stefan Simanowitz
Friday, November 19th, 2010

A fortnight ago while on a tour of the region ahead of a new round of informal talks between the two sides in one of the world’s longest running conflicts, Christopher Ross, the United Nations’ special envoy for the Western Sahara, stressed that there was a “need to lessen tensions and avoid any incident that could worsen the situation or hamper discussions”. Just two weeks later, Western Sahara is ablaze – literally and metaphorically.

In the early hours of the morning on Monday November 8, Moroccan security forces moved in to remove an estimated 20,000 Saharawi protesters from the makeshift protest camp where they had been living for the past month. The security forces were met with anger as the tented city was razed to the ground amid unconfirmed reports of large numbers of injuries and possible fatalities. Violent clashes between Saharawis and Moroccan forces have been reported across El Aaiun, Western Sahara’s capital.

The camp, know as Gdeim Izik, was set up on October 9 and attracted Saharawi protesters from surrounding cities demanding improved housing and employment opportunities. Moroccan forces were quick to surround the camp and over the past month there were a number of clashes between protesters and the police, the most serious being the killing of a 14-year-old boy shot dead by Moroccan forces as he was travelling towards Gdeim Izik in a car.

Journalists were banned from entering the camp and at the weekend three Spanish MPs attempting to visit the camp were refused entry to the country. The Moroccan authorities obtained a court order to remove the camp. At around 6am on November 8, the army moved in using tear gas and high-pressure hoses to clear the protesters.

“Everyone is being attacked – children, women, men, the elderly”, the Saharawi human rights organisation, Sahara Thawra, reported on its website. “They are destroying the tents and part of the camp is burning.” Moroccan forces met violent resistance which reportedly left a gendarme, a civil defence official and a fireman dead.

The number of casualties has been hard to confirm, but unofficial claims are that 11 Saharawi were killed, 723 injured and 159 are missing. Additional reports suggest that an unknown number of Saharawi have been detained. Moroccan authorities announced the death of an employee of the Moroccan Phosphate Office, bringing the total number of deaths confirmed by Morocco to six.
Meanwhile, in New York, the United Nations brokered “talks about talks”. These were due to take place on Monday and Tuesday last week, but were delayed amid angry recriminations. The UN envoy for the Polisario Front described the Moroccan action in El Aaiun as “a deliberate act to
wreck the talks.”

In the House of Commons, Labour MP Jeremy Corbyn referred to the incident and asked the Foreign Secretary to “intervene urgently with the Government of Morocco and the UN to bring about a resolution to this crisis”. During his tour of the region, his fourth trip to the region since becoming special envoy in January 2009, Christopher Ross described the current impasse over Western Sahara as “untenable”. Martin Nesirky, spokesperson for UN Secretary General Ban Ki Moon has said resolving the conflict was a “priority for the United Nations”.

However, if a resolution is to be found, this rhetoric must be matched by action. The Moroccan occupation has been allowed to continue in breach of international law and of UN resolutions for more than 35 years and the UN’s peacekeeping mission in Western Sahara remains the only contemporary peacekeeping mission without a mandate to monitor human rights. Had they had such a remit, the violence that occurred in Gdeim Izik might have been avoided.

Despite many attempts to break the long-running diplomatic stalemate, progress towards a resolution has been tortuously slow with the Polisario Front being unprepared to negotiate away its legitimate right to self-determination, Morocco rejecting any proposal that contains even the possibility of independence and the Security Council unwilling to enforce its own resolutions to hold a referendum on self-determination. History shows that a political solution will be the only way forward and the international community will have an important role and responsibility in helping ensuring negotiations take place.

Fifty years ago next month, the United Nations adopted Resolution 1514 which stated that all people have a right to self-determination and that colonialism should be brought to a speedy and unconditional end. Half a century later, the Saharawi people are still waiting for Resolution 1514 to be applied in Western Sahara.

Often, as with South Africa’s state of emergency in the 1980s, a conflict edging towards endgame goes through a period of tension. We can only hope that international pressure can prevent this tension resulting in more bloodshed.

Stefan Simanowitz is a journalist, writer and broadcaster. He chairs the Free Western Sahara Network

The only place you can read all of Tribune's articles as soon as they are published is in the magazine. To find out more about subscribing from as little as £19, click here.

About The Author

Stefan Simanowitz is a journalist, broadcaster and human rights campaigner. He is chair of the Free Western Sahara Network
  • Gany1

    despicably partial story. Quiet normal from someone who is know for his positions supporting the polisario and refusing to hear anything else. The incidents referred to in the story were instigated by elements known for their affiliation to Algeria and the polisario in order to torpedo the negociations processus. Since Morocco presented an autonomy plan, proving thus its will to move ahead to sort out the problem, Algeria found itself in a very serious position. That’s why the Algerians and their polisario agents try as hard as they can to sabotage the processus, knowing that all international players saw in the Moroccan autonomy the best way to move forward. One has to bear in mind that the Sahara issue is a problem between Algeria and Morocco. The Algerian army which rules the country, with a bit of modern make-up, use the sahara issue to serve different purposes: First, export its internal crises, which multiple: economic, social and political. Second, any candidate to the make-up position of president of the republic has to stick its line on the sahara. Third, to try and brake Morocco’s huge development and democratic advance. It would be an utter blindness not to recognize these facts. Anyway, a clearer image is now starting to emerge from the Sahara after the Laayoune incidents. The public opinion in Europe and the Arab world woke up to this reality when some Spanish media used, inhumanely, pictures from Palestine and others of penal crimes, as they reflected what happened in Laayoune. Truth will prevail.

  • Gay1

    The Sahara was, is and will always be a part and parcel of Morocco, whether Algeria likes it or not. Had Algeria been a democratic country, the issue would have never existed. The Algerians have been dessiminating fallacious information and conducting misleading propaganda that a very simple critical analysis helps unveil. Injecting money to buy so-called lobbyists to lead people astray. Morocco will remain mobilised to defend its territory and to continue its development efforts, despite the Algerian tactics and sabotage.

  • swatantra

    About time that democracy were introduced to both Algeria and Morocco, one being an absolute monarchy the other being an absolute army dictatorship.There has been relatively little progress in Western Sahara and the tribals are pans in the game and suffering. Whether Independence is a good thing or not is another matter. Lets see how Sudan goes.

  • Ken

    Then why did the International Court of Justice reject Morocco’s claim to Western Sahara, why does the international community not accept Morocco’s claim, and why has the rest of Africa accepted Western Sahara as a member of the OAU (Morocco now being the only African country that is not a member)? And if the Moroccans really believed Western Sahara was part of Morocco, why have they done their best to obstruct plans for a referendum?

blog comments powered by Disqus