The right leader at the right time

It was evident immediately after Labour’s leadership contest last year that there would be a cohort of disgruntled members who would never be satisfied with the result.

by Tribune Editorial
Sunday, June 19th, 2011

With commendable self-discipline this discontent has been buried by a self-denying ordinance in public. But it bubbles beneath the surface and is emerging in covert operations to maximise Ed Miliband’s discomfort at what has turned out to be a vulnerable point in his leadership. But it is not the predictable doubts of the New Labour partisans that should be worrying the Labour leader now. Of more concern should be the mounting frustration of his supporters, among which Tribune is to be counted.

Mr Miliband needs to make no apologies for biding his time in a thorough overhaul of his party’s policies. That’s what he said he would do. Nor did he deliver any false promises about the speed with which he would make his mark on national politics. He has been growing into the job. Not so long ago, another Leader of the Opposition set out to relaunch his party with a review of the manifesto he’d had a hand in writing. Under constant pelting from his own right wing, it took him two years to assert his authority. He now resides in Downing Street.It is not long – just eight months – since Mr Miliband was elected. But he does not have two years.

From the economy to the National Health Service, welfare, work and education, the destruction – in spite of all the U-turns – of the social fabric of Britain demands a stronger Opposition. A leader alone cannot fulfil all the obligations required, it needs a Shadow Cabinet pulling together in tireless forensic and co-ordinated attack which resonates with public feeling. Mr Miliband is handicapped by a Shadow Cabinet which does not wholeheartedly embrace his authority.

Dave Prentis, whose Unison members are in the front line of public sector cuts, hit a nerve when he told a newspaper that the Shadow Cabinet “still believe they are in government and therefore have got to make reasonable statements”. He went on: “They are not playing their part strongly in opposition”, adding damningly with reference to the campaign against the NHS reforms: “We were running that campaign for six months before we heard anything from the Labour Party.”He may not be everybody’s cup of tea, but the Shadow Chancellor Ed Balls has shown how to take the fight to the Tories.

A hostage of those who did not want him as leader, Mr Miliband is pestered by the party’s right to pursue a direction which would define him – for example, by attacking the “undeserving” poor, or the unions. He showed what he really stands for in a conference speech which took Labour from a crushing general election defeat just five months previously to a more confident, hope-filled place with fresh optimism. We need to see more of that spirit. Mr Miliband is the right leader at the right time for Labour. He needs to resolve to follow his own vision and take no prisoners – for the sake of the party and the country.

The only place you can read all of Tribune's articles as soon as they are published is in the magazine. To find out more about subscribing from as little as £19, click here.

About The Author

  • Anonymous

    The reason he hasn’t the backing of the Shadow Cabinet is because they were not chosen by him but imposed on him by the Party.
    The whole premise of the article is wrong. Ed simply is not seen as a future PM by the vast majority of the Brtish public, and more important Party members. And that perception will never change.He is the wrong man at the wrong time. True he may perform a valuable service by reforming the Party structure but like Kinnock he will never make it to No 10. He is seen as a lightweight.
    Neither was it a crushing defeat; thats why the Tories never got their overall majority. Brown manged to stave them off. Labours basic problem now is when to ditch Ed; now or later. Now would be preferable and let Andy Burnham take over as Acting Leader, which would also entail Harriet stepping down as Deputy Leader,, and have anoher round of elections in 2012.  
    Unless decisive action is taken the Party will continue to drift like it did from 2008 to 2010, and continual damaging speculation about the Leadership.

  • Anonymous

    Being disabled myself voting Labour would be a waste of time, voting Tory might mean we might be able to get some changes as the Tories will turn if the right pressure, sadly Miliband is all for the welfare reforms when it suits him, and when an election comes he would say we made mistakes, then the Blairites tell him to suck it up and he comes out with welfare reforms did not go fare enough.

    For a so called socialist paper tribune needs to grow up a bit and remember what socialism is.

  • Anonymous

    Voting Tory is a waste of time, a year into  the Tory led Coalition just shows how many U turns the Tories have done; latest on prison reform. And Dave can’t blame it on the so called moderating influence of te Lib Dems, because they haven’t any influence and are simoly there to make up the numbers.
    As common sense will tell 2/3 peopel are middle class; the so called working class is ever diminishing in numbers as the amount of  heavy repetitive manufacturing work diminishes and its being outsourced elsewhere, becuse British workers don’t want to do it and they are pricing themselves out of jobs.
    What Britain though is good at is hi tech specialist manufacturig and you require specialits skills in that. So the key to the working class is to upskill if they want any future in work. And once they upskill they become part of the aspirational Middle Class. Elections are won in capturing the middle ground and middle class vote. Thats where the future direction is for Labour

  • Anonymous

    And then as middle class earners of course you would want a party which aspires you to go further, which is not labour sadly it’s the Tories.

  • Anonymous

    Dave’s Tories are in fact are being forced tointo continuing the policies of Progressive Labour. There is very little difference in what Labour under Brown or miliband would be doing that dave is doing hse days out of necessity. All those hard line Tory policies have been ditched on Europe on Crime on Welfare etc.
    The difference is that Labour would have given more attention to the social agenda eg socail care, the elderly and overseas aid, etc. That is why people should vote Labour not Tory. If you want a britain where the weakest go to the wall then vote Tory. The only danger for Labour is that is that it is too easily taken in by and taken advantage of by the ‘undeserving’, as Milliband has finally seen the light; it must in future pay more heed to the ‘derserving’. 

  • Anonymous

    Good to see that Ed agrees with me that the Shadow Cabinet team is not of his choosing and he has been forced work with people he’d rather not and perhaps not he best quality. Its like tying the Leaders hands behind his back and sending him into the Lions Den of Tory hate. Time the rules were changed so that the Leader can chose his own team and his own Deputy as well. f he can change the Party structure and bring it kicking and screaming into the C21 then Ed will have done his bit for the Party, even though he doesn’t get to be PM. 

  • terence patrick hewett

    Can you remember Jack de Manio and Meet the Huggets?

  • Anonymous

    Yes i suspect it has more to do with Miliband protecting his back then getting people in who can do a job. I suspect Balls will be removed and of course David given the Job, I expect to see Mandy back in Darth Vader as he is known, I suspect we will see Milibands boys all over the place in a mark 2 Newer labour.

    Should keep labour out for a few terms anyway.

blog comments powered by Disqus