Lennie backed by Ed Miliband for general secretary, as leader criticises public sector strike

In the same week that he came out against this week’s public sector strikes, Labour Party leader Ed Miliband signalled that he is seeking to further distance his leadership from the trade union movement towards a broader, undefined “squeezed middle” in his choice for the incoming general secretary of the party.

by Bernard Purcell
Friday, July 1st, 2011

Chris Lennie, who has extensive experience of the party machinery and is a former acting general secretary but is currently responsible for party fund-raising, emerged as Mr Miliband’s preferred candidate.The post is expected to be for two years with Mr Lennie’s brief described as primarily sorting out party finances and staffing at party headquarters ahead of the next general election.

Prior to the news of Mr Miliband’s preference for Mr Lennie being made public GMB official Iain McNicol had been widely discussed as the most likely candidate (see Tribune May 27) while another name discussed in some quarters had been that of Joe Irvine, a former political officer to Gordon Brown.Mr Miliband, who last week said he wanted to break away from the tradition of an elected shadow cabinet in favour of his own best choices for the portfolios, has been canvassing support for Mr Lennie among members of Labour’s National Executive Committe.

Mr Lennie is not regarded within Labour as carrying any particular ideological baggage although he was instrumental in securing a safe seat for self-styled arch-Blairite David Miliband and has worked closely with Alastair Campbell.If successful, Mr Lennie will replace Ray Collins, who was appointed in 2008 following the withdrawal of city fund manager David Pitt-Watson. The NEC will decide on July 19.

Meanwhile, Mr Miliband will be weighing the political consequences of his 11th hour call to teachers’ and public service unions not to go ahead with nationwide industrial action. He said the strikes were a “sign of failure” and “a mistake” and unions should exhaust the negotiating process.

The only place you can read all of Tribune's articles as soon as they are published is in the magazine. To find out more about subscribing from as little as £19, click here.

About The Author

Bernard Purcell is Tribune's Chief Reporter
  • Anonymous

    Ed was caught between a rock and a hard place, and couldn’t say anything else. In fact he said it 6 times the same thing oiver and over again; I’m surprised the interviewer didn’t challenge him about it. This basically shows that Ed was simply not ready to take on the Leadership.Inexperience. Imagine what Blairor Brown or Andy Burnham would have said in that interview. And its not going to get any bettr for Ed the Unready.
    If Lennie can put the Party finaces on a sound footing then he’s the man. Somehow we have to go for State Funding for Parties otherwise we are continually tied to Union funding. And that is not good in the Public’s eyes.
    .

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Will-Podmore/780339646 Will Podmore

    Miliband’s opposition to the strike is no surprise.
    It’s not a matter of his experience or lack of it.
    No Labour party leader in history has ever backed a strike. Every Labour party leader sides with the employer, before strikes, during strikes and after strikes. What do you expect? That’s their job!
    And as for State Funding for Parties, why should the taxpayer ever fund any of the parliamentary pimps and parasites?

  • Anonymous

    Si Peter Goldsmith the man who ok’ed the 2nd UN resolution to go into Iraq has pontificated on Ed’s Leadership. This time he is right. The sooner Labour grasp the nettle the better. get it over and done with and we can go forward t the Sept conference with resolve.
    Ed is right about tackling social care. Labour should have gone ahead and done it with its majority, not sit around waiting for a consensus. Its like waiting for Godot. The other Parties are pretty useless and dont understand ‘welfare’. or AV for that matter.