US sides with the right in opposing a financial transaction tax

Barack Obama’s administration has joined the Conservative-led coalition in opposing the introduction of a European Union financial transaction tax following a fractious meeting of European finance ministers in Poland.

by Ben Fox
Friday, September 23rd, 2011

The intervention by US Treasury Secretary, Tim Geithner, led to a row at an already tense meeting dominated by the Greek debt crisis. Polish Finance Minister Jacek Rostowski said there had been “very considerable divisions” during the discussions.

However, despite the opposition of Mr Geithner and Chancellor George Osborne, who remains publicly supportive only of a global tax on financial transactions, claiming an

EU tax would damage London’s financial services sector, European countries have vowed to go ahead with the proposal.

Draft legislation for a tax in the EU is expected to reach the European Parliament and European Council

ahead of the next G20 summit on October 13.

According to a leaked working document, the European Commission is planning the tax to deal with a wide range of financial products, with a tax rate of 0.1 per cent on stocks and bonds and 0.01 per cent for derivatives.

It is understood that the remaining issues of contention concern how the tax revenues would be collected and how they would be used.

While Commission President José Manuel Barosso argued in the summer that the tax should be used to fund the EU budget, opinion is divided on whether revenues should be earmarked for development spending, domestic budgets or EU rescue funds.

Meanwhile, opposition to the tax among EU finance ministers is declining following a co-ordinated move by the German Finance Minister, Wolfgang Schauble, and the French Minister for the Economy and Finance, François Baroin, urging its introduction.

The British, Dutch and Swedish governments remain its main opponents within the EU, with the Dutch government currently offering support for a financial transactions tax only if Britain signs up to it.

The campaign in favour of the tax at EU level was led by the Party of European Socialists and has drawn together NGOs and politicians from all sides of the political divide.

 

The only place you can read all of Tribune's articles as soon as they are published is in the magazine. To find out more about subscribing from as little as £19, click here.

About The Author

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_RHDNMXGQ7BM2DUDBDDVJUJ3TZY Tom

    EU officials talk as if the financial transaction tax (FTT) is a done deal. There’s one big problem they refuse to recognize. Implementation of any EU-wide tax requires unanimous approval. The UK, Sweden, the Netherlands and Malta have all said “no” loud and clear.

    The UK has been unwavering in its opposition to any EU-imposed FTT. And just last week, Anders Borg, the Swedish Finance Minister said, “We have substantial experience in Sweden. Basically most of our derivative and bond trading went to London during the years we had a financial transaction tax. So if you don’t get a solution that is universal [global] it is very likely to be detrimental for European financial markets. And from the Swedish perspective, we cannot foresee that we would introduce such a tax in our system again.” The Dutch Finance Minister, Jan Kees de Jager, has said on several occasions that the Dutch won’t support a financial transactions tax because it will drive investment capital out of the Netherlands. And Malta has made it clear they won’t agree to any EU imposed tax because it “considers taxation as a national issue and outside the EU’s remit.” If that weren’t enough, Bulgaria has now come out against the tax.

    Until they get unanimous consent, there will be no EU financial transaction tax.     

blog comments powered by Disqus