Kevin Maguire

Of course the EU isn’t perfect, but it’s time for a ‘Better Off In’ campaign

by Kevin Maguire
Friday, November 11th, 2011

Europhobes on Britain’s tight-whinge don’t spell out what they mean when banging on about repatriating pooled powers from Brussels and the European Union for one very good reason. Demanding greater freedom for bosses to hire and fire staff at will, stripping workers of paid holidays and flogging disposable hired hands close to exhaustion isn’t likely to have people flocking to their banner. So instead they wave the union flag and preach an ideology of national sovereignty which has been redundant since the end of the Second World War.

The growth of what Rotherham MP  Denis MacShane has termed the Farageist Tendency offers false answers to complex questions, pointing the finger of blame over the Channel for every problem and mistake made in Britain. David Cameron seized the euro’s difficulties to deflect responsibility for the austerity which is actually coalition policy, hiding behind the single currency because the British Government’s choked-off growth and the cuts are  proving unpopular.

So Labour should resist the temptation to flirt with Euro-bashing, hoping to win temporary popularity with foam-flecked newspapers and swivel-eyed figures who prove empty vessels make the most noise.

Manoeuvring to embarrass Cameron is one thing, exploiting the discomfort of a premier who championed Europhobia in opposition and in office is required to recognise realities and make a speech in the House of Commons extolling the benefits to Britain of membership of the EU. The irony was delicious – the grand posh duke of Downing Street forced to march his 10,000 men back down the hill when they wanted to go over the top.

Yet even Tory bogeyman Michael Ashcroft recognises that banging on constantly about Europe risks damaging the Conservative cause, pigeon-holing the Tories as a single cause party. Poke people with an opinion poll and a daily diet of anti-EU propaganda from much of Fleet Street will prompt calls for a referendum and a sizable number are calling for Britain to leave. Ask people what really matters to them and their family and they’ll reply jobs, living standards, the economy, health service, crime, education, housing and, yes, immigration – Europe trailing far behind. Ben Page of Ipsos Mori is a voice of reason when he reminds us the EU gets out of bed only three in evey 100 subjects of Her Majesty. Listen to the likes on the Tory benches of David Nuttall (ludicrously blaming the EU for the closure of units in his Bury local hospital when the election promise to keep it open is broken by his own Government) and every red-blooded English man and woman is massing at the Channel Tunnel to repel Eurocrats.

But to embrace anti-EU sentiment would be a strategic mistake, political opportunism which Labour would bitterly regret. Labour’s been here before. The 1975 referendum staged by Labour’s Harold Wilson after Tory Ted Heath took Britain into the then European Economic Community recorded a two-to-one majority in favour of continuing membership. Eight years later, at the 1983 general election, the party’s manifesto was committed to withdrawal. It’s a reminder in recent history, if one was needed, that another referendum would settle nothing. Then, from 1988, as former TUC and European TUC general secretary John Monks recently recalled, Labour moved full circle. Jacques Delors, then President of the European Commission address to the annual TUC Congress offered British trade unionism a vision of a better future than the nightmare created by Margaret Thatcher. The Delors deal was protection against the worst the Conservative Government could impose  in an era when only a few deluded souls really believed a Labour administration was about to come riding to the rescue.

The social dimension of the EU remains as important today as it did then. That is not to argue the EU is perfect or to ignore the neo-liberal forces in what is a capitalist club. God help us all if Andrew Lansley unleashes tendering across the National Health Service, exposing the country’s greatest institution to the mercilessness of market forces. But we must remember that’s a deliberate political choice if the Health Secretary goes down that disastrous road and not an unavoidable consequence of British engagement with the continent and Ireland.

We can’t stop the world and ask to get off without suffering and those in the Labour and trade union movement who would wave goodbye should be careful what they wish for. The alternative isn’t a socialist Nirvana or the EU but the EU and right-wingers stripping workers of rights.

The EU isn’t perfect and member states should be trusted more. But it’s a damn sight better than the alternative desired by Europhobes under cover of a referendum dressed in sovereignty. It’s time for a “Better Off In” campaign.

The wonderful Geoffrey Goodman, one of the greatest journalists ever to write for the Daily Mirror, last week made the case for Tribune far better than I could ever hope. And I know the editor and his fellow co-operators don’t want columnists going on and on about the paper instead of political issues. But off the top of my head I could name a dozen publications I wouldn’t miss and Britain might be better off without. Public debate badly needs, on the other hand, the voice offered by Tribune. Here’s to the next 75 years.

The only place you can read all of Tribune's articles as soon as they are published is in the magazine. To find out more about subscribing from as little as £19, click here.

About The Author

  • http://twitter.com/kilkeal barry laughton

    The Europhiles have to prove that the EU is worth £45,000,000 sterling a day by belonging to their club. That, in money terms, the costs belonging to this organisation costs the UK.

  • http://twitter.com/Jailhouselawyer John Hirst

    Of course we’re better off in. Nigel Farage criticises Europe whilst supping from the gravy boat. And the Tories came into power without a policy on Europe because Europe to them is something foreign. National sovereignty amounts to 1/47th of the Council of Europe and 1/27th of the European Union. European law does not recognise Sovereignty of Parliament. Rather, it recognises sovereignty of the people. Another thing about European law is that it recognises the doctrine of the Separation of Powers, whereas in the UK we have the fusion of powers. The UK fails to provide the necessary checks and balances against abuses of power. Prisoners, and the population generally, are better off in Europe.

    Recently, Kenneth Clarke and Dominic Grieve have spoken out in favour of the European law subsidiarity principle. They have not said that it is being forced upon the UK by Europe. Nor do they understand the implications of the principle. They seem to think that they can pick and choose those parts of it which suit National sovereignty. Big mistake. It relates to people power and not power in Westminster. For example, I take a case to Hull County Court only if it cannot be resolved at local level does it need to go central and then across to Europe. It is bottom up as opposed to top down. For the first time in UK history a litigant in person can challenge the Executive, Parliament and Judiciary in the lowest court in the land. Moreover, my argument is not founded on English law but instead on European law. This will ruffle a few feathers of the Nationalists.

    Already the House of Commons is claiming that the case should be struck out because an Assistant Counsel claims  “We can see no issues in the Particulars of Claim which should lie against the House of Commons”. Correct me if I am wrong, but isn’t the Commons and Lords together what constitutes Parliament? Under the subsidiarity principle “the prevention of human rights violations is the responsibility of each State which wishes to be recognized as one governed by rule of law”. The 3 arms of the State are the Executive, Parliament and Judiciary. If one or all 3 arms of the State fail in this respect then they are legally liable for the consequences. In the Prisoners Votes case it is arguable that all 3 have failed miserably. All the UK had to do to remedy the human rights violation was amend s.3 of the Representation of the Peoples Act 1983. All we have heard from them and the media is excuses, but no explanations, for non-compliance of Hirst v UK (No2), and attacks upon foreign judges in Europe. Each country in the Council of Europe sends 1 judge, therefore to the other 46 countries the judges are foreign. But, none of them raise the issue save for the UK. National sovereignty raising its ugly head again. We really do need to get away from racism and xenophobia.

    We are told that Parliament cannot be questioned outside of Parliament. I am sorry, but they work for us. Are you seriously telling me that the employer cannot question employees? We have moved on from the Bill of Rights 1688/9. Joe and Josephine Public did not even have a vote way back then. This was Parliament asserting its authority over Royalty. As the British Empire waned our country joined the United States of Europe for survival. It involved a sacrifice of National sovereignty. Some still like to think we have a British Empire. In your dreams. I am proud to be European. One day we will recogonise it like we do White British and English. William Hague likes to remind us that he is Secretary of State at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office. What Commonwealth? He has announced that he has put human rights at the forefront of foreign policy. We at home ask, ‘What about our human rights?’. When he points his finger at those abroad for their poor human rights record, they point at the stye in his eye.

    Bottom line. Either we swim with Europe or sink.

  • http://twitter.com/geyza Geyza

    Well done for admitting defeat on this Mr Maguire.  Referring to patriots and realists (the same people being proved right every day about not joining the Euro BTW) with the pejorative term “Europhobes” shows that you have lost the argument and are resigned to petty insults.   Being against political membership of a profoundly anti-democratic EU, does NOT equal a phobia.  Phobia being an extreme irrational fear, rather than a logical and reasoned dislike.  You are wilfully twisting language to show a negative, dishonest, false and ignorant presentation of your opponents. By so doing you lose your argument.

    IF you are capable of reasoned argument based upon rational facts, then join in the calls for an in or out referendum and engage those of us who Love Europe, but hate the EU oligarchy.  Put your arguments that it is better to stay chained ever closer to a dying market of 0.5 billion skint, austerity bashed former consumers, rather than free ourselves to trade openly with 4 billion consumers around the world, free from EU restrictions.  Put your argument that it is better for us to have more and more of our laws dictated to us by unelected foreigners, than by our own elected representatives.

    It is not the Eurosceptics which are running away from debate, democracy and a referendum.  It is the anti-British,supporters of the EU (who would more accurately be described as “little Englanders”) who falsely believe that England is too small and too pathetic to make it’s own way in the world.  The self hate and defeatism of the Europhiles is sickening.

    Take us on in this debate and join our calls for a referendum then put your argument to a public vote, if you dare.

  • http://twitter.com/geyza Geyza

    “Bottom line. Either we swim with Europe or sink”

    I think your passionate idealism has blinded you to reality.  Europe is sinking.  Mathematics shows that the Euro cannot survive. Merkel states that the EU cannot survive without the Euro and the fact is the Euro is finished.  Either we free ourselves from Europe to swim to calmer waters, or we get dragged down and drown with Europe.

  • http://twitter.com/kilkeal barry laughton

    And whilst I don’t agree with your premise, even if I did I wouldn’t believe that belonging to this organisation is worth £45,000,000 sterling a day to the detriment of the UK economy. Last comment I cannot see me ever being proud of being European.

  • katabasis katabasis

    An utterly ignorant article. You appear to know nothing about the EU’s net negative influence on the UK’s ability to decide what is best for its workers or the NHS. A number of prominent union leaders and Labour MPs have come to the euro-sceptic camp because they stopped drinking the EU propaganda kool-aid.  Your smear about a fear of Lansley “unleashing tendering” is especially telling. It IS the “unavoidable consequence of British engagement with the continent” – or rather, the EU, which is what you meant to write, right? (Rather than disingenuously imply using “continent” that EU-sceptics must also be anti-Europe).

  • http://twitter.com/Shinsei1967 Nick Reid

    I think you misread the opinion polls that put Europe at the bottom of people’s priorities.

    I suspect that most people don’t care too much about intangible things like sovereignty (hence why Europe only polls 3%) but they do care about:

    Europe’s effect on IMMIGRATION.
    Europe’s effect on JOBS.
    Europe’s effect on the ECONOMY.

    ie all the things at the top of people’s list of priorities.

blog comments powered by Disqus