European unions accused eurozone leaders of pandering to financial markets and failing to set out a sustainable strategy for growth. New ETUC general decretary Bernadette Ségol talks to Kate Holman
features
Crisis and resolution, recession and solution
By Julian Priestley /Saturday, November 5th, 2011After nearly two years of political grandstanding, market panics and botched bailouts, Europe’s debt crisis is rapidly approaching resolution. After 14 summits and thousands of hours spent in fetid rooms, the single currency is still in crisis but there seems to be a way forward. The capacity of the European Financial Stability Facility – the [...]
That was then, this is now and this must be the future
By Geoffrey Goodman /Friday, November 4th, 2011It was shortly after the end of the Second World War, circa 1946, when I returned to Fleet Street to join that once great liberal daily newspaper, News Chronicle as a reporter. And it was also my first introduction as a contributor to Tribune. Sometime later, Michael Foot took over as editor from Jon Kimche [...]
Economic justice must be done – and it must be seen to be done
By Dave Tucker /Saturday, October 29th, 2011Two years on from the supposed “end” of the financial crisis, the economic outlook continues to worsen for the vast majority of ordinary people. Unemployment, particularly among young people, has reached record highs following government austerity programmes, while inflation continues to rocket. At the European level, the eurozone itself is in crisis and is being [...]
Ninety-nine per cent need a Pauline conversion from a system in a crisis
By Cary Gee /Saturday, October 29th, 2011Most modern movements coalesce around a clearly stated objective – “Stop the War’, “Nuclear Disarmament”, “End Tuition Fees”, which is at once easily reduced to a slogan and quickly grasped by the mainstream media as something that will cease to exist beyond a finite point. The tented protest against capitalist inequality outside St Paul’s Cathedral [...]
Growing movement for a Wall Street shuffle
By Stefan Simanowitz /Sunday, October 23rd, 2011 “You know, deep down I never believed that this movement could change anything”, Shaun Bickard admits as we march along Broadway with 20,000 noisy demonstrators. “But, after today, I’m beginning to think it can.”
Bickard, a 41-year-old electrician from the Bronx has never regarded himself as a political activist. He visited Zuccotti Park, the heart of the Occupy Wall Street protest, after seeing footage online of four women pepper-sprayed by a policeman. “At first, I just came to check it out. Then I came back and I joined the march on Brooklyn Bridge where I ended up being one of the 700 arrested”, he explains. “When I stepped out of jail, I found that my support for the movement had turned into full-on commitment.”
It is stories such as this that have transformed Occupy Wall Street from a small protest of into a significant nationwide movement in the space of four short weeks.
The recent march from Zuccotti Park to Foley Square was a high-water mark in terms of mobilisation for the movement, as workers from 15 of New York’s biggest unions came out in solidarity. Until then, the protestors had confined themselves to Zuccotti Park, the concrete plaza in the centre of New York’s financial district that has provided a permanent base for the protest since September 17. While the park provides a crucial practical and symbolic focal point for the movement, it cannot accommodate the numbers that turned out for the march. Indeed, on the afternoon of Saturday October 8, expecting a large turnout, Occupy Wall Street held its 3 o’clock general assembly in the larger Washington Park. But these are the type of logistical difficulties the movement relishes.
Occupy Wall Street is attracting increasingly large numbers of people of all ages and from all backgrounds. The mood is upbeat and the festive atmosphere has been aided by a spell of the unseasonably warm weather which topped 80 degrees the other weekend. But, despite the positivity, there is also a strong undercurrent of anger. “Damn right I’m angry”, says 48-year old Lawrence English. “I’ve got three kids and haven’t worked for over two years. Our government cares more about corporations than it does about people. This ain’t just an occupation, it’s a hostile takeover.”
Despite their anger, the protesters are committed to non-violence and determined not to allow themselves to be portrayed in the media as an unruly, destructive mob. Even in the face of well-documented incidents of police brutality, the protesters have remained peaceful. Following widespread criticism of the police’s strong-arm tactics – particularly the mass arrests on Brooklyn Bridge – it seems that the New York Police Department has been ordered to take a more restrained approach.
In Zuccotti Park – nicknamed Liberty Plaza – several hundred protesters congregate day and night, their numbers swelling in the afternoons and early evenings as people gather for the two daily general assemblies. Described as “a horizontal, autonomous, leaderless, consensus-based system”, the general assembly is modelled on the assemblies that have driven recent social movements in Cairo’s Tahrir Square and Madrid’s Puerta del Sol. Anyone present at the assembly can propose an idea or express an opinion and decisions are reached by a show of hands.
The method does not make for quick decision-making and is slowed down considerably by the fact that the New York City authorities have not granted the protesters a permit to use “amplified sound”. This means microphones, speakers and even hand-held megaphones are banned and the general assembly has had to adopt an innovative system dubbed the “human mic”, whereby each sentence is repeated by those around the speaker and then repeated again by the next ring of people until the sentence ripples across the park.
The organisation in Zuccotti Park is impressive. There are no leaders or governing body, but smaller working groups have been set up to support specific initiatives ranging from food, medical and legal committees to arts and culture, and direct action. ‘Stations” around the park provide information and services including sleeping bags, clothing and toothpaste. A generator provides power to ensure all events in the park are filmed and “live-streamed” and a charging station enables protestors to recharge their mobile phones, cameras and computers. Volunteers circulate picking up rubbish and there is even a library and a broadsheet newspaper – the Occupied Wall Street Journal. An open-air canteen serves free food, its menu constantly replenished with donations from local shops, or well-wishers, or bought with donations. As well as a variety of staples such as peanut butter-jelly sandwiches and rice and beans, it can offer surprises such as sushi and ice cream.
One of the main criticisms levelled at the movement is that it lacks focus and concrete goals. Indeed, ask each person in Zuccotti Park why they are there and you will get a different answer. You will hear talk about unemployment and welfare cuts, healthcare costs and environmental destruction, cuts to public education and unfair taxation. But, despite the multiplicity of issues raised, there is an underlying cohesive sense of anger at corporate greed, government mismanagement and inequality.
So far, the movement has not attempted to offer a clear set solutions or concrete list of demands. While these may emerge, there is no sense of urgency to focus on anything other than growing the movement. Addressing the general assembly on Sunday October 9, the political philosopher Slavoj Zizek acknowledged that: “There are truly difficult questions that confront us. We know what we do not want. But what do we want?” For Zizek, the central message is a clear one: “We are allowed to think about alternatives.”
For those involved in these early stages of the movement, the mood is intoxicating and contagious. But, as the warm October weather slips away and tactical differences become more pronounced, there are dangers. “Don’t fall in love with yourselves”, warns Zizek. “We have a nice time here. But remember: carnivals come cheap. What matters is the day after.”
There is much discussion around the question of what a “win” would look like for Occupy Wall Street. Some think that they have already won, while others believe that the movement has only just begun. In some ways, both viewpoints are right. Over the past month, Occupy Wall Street has succeeded in permanently altering the political topography of the United States. How much more it achieves in the coming months remains to be seen.
“I’m here because I remember the Great Depression”, 80-year-old Joan Davis tells me, her voice breaking with emotion. “My sister and I would often go to bed hungry and I still remember the look on my dad’s face the day he was forced to sell our farm. Things in America have needed changing for a long while and just maybe these people and others across the country can make a real difference.”
We must get back to basics to defend and build on Labour’s greatest achievement
By Kailash Chand /Saturday, October 22nd, 2011Only by returning to the principles that underpinned its creation can the National Health
Service be saved
This progressive plan is the only one that will work
By Michael Meacher /Saturday, October 22nd, 2011Public sector job creation is the only way out of the slump and we are running out
of time to recognise this.
Welcome to the Farageiste Tendency
By Denis MacShane /Sunday, October 9th, 2011The late Julian Critchley was the Conservative MP who invented the concept of the “Garageiste Tendency” to describe hard-line Tory MPs who had made money by selling cars and wanted Margaret Thatcher to be even more right-wing than she was. Now let us all welcome the “Farageiste Tendency” – the group of hardline Tories who [...]
They just don’t get it – but the voters might
By Chris McLaughlin /Saturday, October 8th, 2011Did you get it? If you had to rely on the judgement of the commentariat the chances are that you wouldn’t. Ed Miliband’s speech to Labour conference has provoked reactions ranging from incomprehensible to revolutionary. “A leaden speech that had little to do with reality,” according to the Daily Telegraph. A leader in The Times [...]
